Thank you Vanda for your insights. I totally agree with you. Hadia On Thursday, August 8, 2024 at 12:31:04 AM GMT+3, Vanda Scartezini via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote: Dear all In my view, I liked the ccNSO and ALAC proposals. They can merge or not. The advantage of merging is a broader overview for WSIS + 20. The IPC proposal is, in my view, more related to constant improvement and holistic review since mechanisms shall normally evolve. In the same way, the Registries suggestion is more of an internal discussion on how to facilitate domain owners to progress. Thanks for sharing, Hadia. Vanda From:Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, 6 August 2024 at 10:27 To: cpwg@icann.org <cpwg@icann.org>, Joanna Kulesza <joannakulesza@gmail.com>, Joanna Kulesza <joanna_kulesza@wpia.uni.lodz.pl>, pariesfandiari@gmail.com <pariesfandiari@gmail.com> Cc: Avri Doria <avri.doria@board.icann.org>, Justine Chew <justine.chew@gmail.com> Subject: [CPWG] Suggestion to merge AT-Large/ALAC and ccNSO ICANN81 proposed sessions Dear All, There has been a suggestion proposed at the SOAC-Leaders-ICANN Meeting-Planning to merge both the ALAC and ccNSO sessions into one session along the lines “ICANN's role with respect to new InternetInfrastructures being proposed nationally and internationally" please take a look and let me know what you think? I have included both proposals here to ease the comparison. You can also find all proposals at :https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ICANN81+Community+Session%3A+SO+... ccNSO proposal The ccNSO Council suggests a plenary on the topic of the WSIS+20
Review and what ICANN (the community and the organisation) can do to help advertise and preserve ICANN’s multi-stakeholder model, and the broader multi-stakeholder internet governance approach, during the Review.
ICANN is working with the community to reflect on lessons learned in the GDC process during 2023-2024, and developing a strategy for the role ICANN and its community can play during the WSIS+20 review in 2024 and 2025. By the time ICANN81 rolls around, this strategy should be well developed, and it will be time to further mobilise the ICANN community around the role it can play in this important work.
The main outcomes of such a session should be that:
* The ICANN community is well informed about the strategic approach to the WSIS+20 Review, and what role individual organisations and communities can play * The ICANN community is mobilised to play the roles they can play as part of the Review
A secondary outcome would be the sharing of greater insight about where the WSIS+20 review is at, though this can be covered in the Geopolitical session.
At-Large/ALAC Proposal _Working Title_: Shifting Paradigms: Multistakeholderism, Geopolitics,International Law, and New Internet Infrastructures.
_Objective/Aims_: To explore the intersections of geopolitics, international law, and emerging internet infrastructures. Key topics include the reshaping of the multistakeholder model, implications for new internet infrastructures, and data governance. The discussion will reference the2024 United States International Cyberspace & Digital Policy
Strategy, EU's GDPR, the AI Act, and NIS2. This session is crucial for end users,regulators, policymakers, technologists, legal experts, academics, andother stakeholders in the Interne
governance community. It emphasizesthe link between infrastructure governance and data management from theend user perspective, highlighting the importance of user-centricapproaches in
shaping the future of internet infrastructures.
_Proposed Speakers_:
- Vint Cerf, Internet Pioneer - Leon Sanchez, ICANN Board Member - Jorge Cancio, Deputy Head of the International Relations Team at theFederal Office of Communications (OFCOM); GAC Switzerland - Pari Esfandiari, ALAC/EURALO, Global TechnoPolitics Forum - Susan Chalmers, Internet Policy Specialist, US Department ofCommerce, NTIA - Berna Akçalı Gür, Lecturer, CCLS Queen Mary University of London,Associate Research Fellow at UNU-CRIS Digital Cluster - John Crain, ICANN SVP & Chief Technology Officer
_Moderator:_ Joanna Kulesza, ALAC Liaison to the GAC
_Scoping Questions_:
1. How should the multistakeholder model evolve to accommodate new internet infrastructures and the shift towards them in governance? 2. What are the primary governance challenges posed by the development of new internet infrastructures and governance models? 3. How do existing regulatory frameworks like GDPR, the AI Act, and NIS2 address the challenges and opportunities presented by new internet infrastructures and respective governance models?
_Expected Outcomes_:
- A comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities presented by new internet infrastructures and the regulatory shift towards them - MSM implications. - Insight into how existing regulatory frameworks, including the MSM,can adapt to these emerging technologies. - Enhanced dialogue among stakeholders on the future of multistakeholderInternet governance.
Kind regards Hadia Elminiawi Eng. Hadia Elminiawi (M.Sc.) Chief Expert on International Policies National Telecom Regulatory Authority of Egypt (NTRA) Building 124, Smart Village, Cairo-Alex Desert Road, Giza, Egypt. Tel: 202 3534-4392 Mail: Hadia@tra.gov.eg _______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list -- cpwg@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to cpwg-leave@icann.org _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.