Suggestion to merge AT-Large/ALAC and ccNSO ICANN81 proposed sessions
Dear All, There has been a suggestion proposed at the SOAC-Leaders-ICANN Meeting-Planning to merge both the ALAC and ccNSO sessions into one session along the lines “ICANN's role with respect to new Internet Infrastructures being proposed nationally and internationally" please take a look and let me know what you think? I have included both proposals here to ease the comparison. You can also find all proposals at : https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ICANN81+Community+Session%3A+SO+... ccNSO proposal The ccNSO Council suggests a plenary on the topic of the WSIS+20
Review and what ICANN (the community and the organisation) can do to help advertise and preserve ICANN’s multi-stakeholder model, and the broader multi-stakeholder internet governance approach, during the Review.
ICANN is working with the community to reflect on lessons learned in the GDC process during 2023-2024, and developing a strategy for the role ICANN and its community can play during the WSIS+20 review in 2024 and 2025. By the time ICANN81 rolls around, this strategy should be well developed, and it will be time to further mobilise the ICANN community around the role it can play in this important work.
The main outcomes of such a session should be that:
* The ICANN community is well informed about the strategic approach to the WSIS+20 Review, and what role individual organisations and communities can play * The ICANN community is mobilised to play the roles they can play as part of the Review
A secondary outcome would be the sharing of greater insight about where the WSIS+20 review is at, though this can be covered in the Geopolitical session.
At-Large/ALAC Proposal _Working Title_: Shifting Paradigms: Multistakeholderism, Geopolitics, International Law, and New Internet Infrastructures.
_Objective/Aims_: To explore the intersections of geopolitics, international law, and emerging internet infrastructures. Key topics include the reshaping of the multistakeholder model, implications for new internet infrastructures, and data governance. The discussion will reference the 2024 United States International Cyberspace & Digital Policy Strategy, EU's GDPR, the AI Act, and NIS2. This session is crucial for end users, regulators, policymakers, technologists, legal experts, academics, and other stakeholders in the Interne governance community. It emphasizes the link between infrastructure governance and data management from the end user perspective, highlighting the importance of user-centric approaches in shaping the future of internet infrastructures.
_Proposed Speakers_:
- Vint Cerf, Internet Pioneer - Leon Sanchez, ICANN Board Member - Jorge Cancio, Deputy Head of the International Relations Team at the Federal Office of Communications (OFCOM); GAC Switzerland - Pari Esfandiari, ALAC/EURALO, Global TechnoPolitics Forum - Susan Chalmers, Internet Policy Specialist, US Department of Commerce, NTIA - Berna Akçalı Gür, Lecturer, CCLS Queen Mary University of London, Associate Research Fellow at UNU-CRIS Digital Cluster - John Crain, ICANN SVP & Chief Technology Officer
_Moderator:_ Joanna Kulesza, ALAC Liaison to the GAC
_Scoping Questions_:
1. How should the multistakeholder model evolve to accommodate new internet infrastructures and the shift towards them in governance? 2. What are the primary governance challenges posed by the development of new internet infrastructures and governance models? 3. How do existing regulatory frameworks like GDPR, the AI Act, and NIS2 address the challenges and opportunities presented by new internet infrastructures and respective governance models?
_Expected Outcomes_:
- A comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities presented by new internet infrastructures and the regulatory shift towards them - MSM implications. - Insight into how existing regulatory frameworks, including the MSM, can adapt to these emerging technologies. - Enhanced dialogue among stakeholders on the future of multistakeholder Internet governance.
Kind regards Hadia Elminiawi Eng. Hadia Elminiawi (M.Sc.) Chief Expert on International Policies National Telecom Regulatory Authority of Egypt (NTRA) Building 124, Smart Village, Cairo-Alex Desert Road, Giza, Egypt. Tel: 202 3534-4392 Mail: Hadia@tra.gov.eg
Dear all In my view, I liked the ccNSO and ALAC proposals. They can merge or not. The advantage of merging is a broader overview for WSIS + 20. The IPC proposal is, in my view, more related to constant improvement and holistic review since mechanisms shall normally evolve. In the same way, the Registries suggestion is more of an internal discussion on how to facilitate domain owners to progress. Thanks for sharing, Hadia. Vanda From: Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, 6 August 2024 at 10:27 To: cpwg@icann.org <cpwg@icann.org>, Joanna Kulesza <joannakulesza@gmail.com>, Joanna Kulesza <joanna_kulesza@wpia.uni.lodz.pl>, pariesfandiari@gmail.com <pariesfandiari@gmail.com> Cc: Avri Doria <avri.doria@board.icann.org>, Justine Chew <justine.chew@gmail.com> Subject: [CPWG] Suggestion to merge AT-Large/ALAC and ccNSO ICANN81 proposed sessions Dear All, There has been a suggestion proposed at the SOAC-Leaders-ICANN Meeting-Planning to merge both the ALAC and ccNSO sessions into one session along the lines “ICANN's role with respect to new Internet Infrastructures being proposed nationally and internationally" please take a look and let me know what you think? I have included both proposals here to ease the comparison. You can also find all proposals at : https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ICANN81+Community+Session%3A+SO+... ccNSO proposal The ccNSO Council suggests a plenary on the topic of the WSIS+20
Review and what ICANN (the community and the organisation) can do to help advertise and preserve ICANN’s multi-stakeholder model, and the broader multi-stakeholder internet governance approach, during the Review.
ICANN is working with the community to reflect on lessons learned in the GDC process during 2023-2024, and developing a strategy for the role ICANN and its community can play during the WSIS+20 review in 2024 and 2025. By the time ICANN81 rolls around, this strategy should be well developed, and it will be time to further mobilise the ICANN community around the role it can play in this important work.
The main outcomes of such a session should be that:
* The ICANN community is well informed about the strategic approach to the WSIS+20 Review, and what role individual organisations and communities can play * The ICANN community is mobilised to play the roles they can play as part of the Review
A secondary outcome would be the sharing of greater insight about where the WSIS+20 review is at, though this can be covered in the Geopolitical session.
At-Large/ALAC Proposal _Working Title_: Shifting Paradigms: Multistakeholderism, Geopolitics, International Law, and New Internet Infrastructures.
_Objective/Aims_: To explore the intersections of geopolitics, international law, and emerging internet infrastructures. Key topics include the reshaping of the multistakeholder model, implications for new internet infrastructures, and data governance. The discussion will reference the 2024 United States International Cyberspace & Digital Policy Strategy, EU's GDPR, the AI Act, and NIS2. This session is crucial for end users, regulators, policymakers, technologists, legal experts, academics, and other stakeholders in the Interne governance community. It emphasizes the link between infrastructure governance and data management from the end user perspective, highlighting the importance of user-centric approaches in shaping the future of internet infrastructures.
_Proposed Speakers_:
- Vint Cerf, Internet Pioneer - Leon Sanchez, ICANN Board Member - Jorge Cancio, Deputy Head of the International Relations Team at the Federal Office of Communications (OFCOM); GAC Switzerland - Pari Esfandiari, ALAC/EURALO, Global TechnoPolitics Forum - Susan Chalmers, Internet Policy Specialist, US Department of Commerce, NTIA - Berna Akçalı Gür, Lecturer, CCLS Queen Mary University of London, Associate Research Fellow at UNU-CRIS Digital Cluster - John Crain, ICANN SVP & Chief Technology Officer
_Moderator:_ Joanna Kulesza, ALAC Liaison to the GAC
_Scoping Questions_:
1. How should the multistakeholder model evolve to accommodate new internet infrastructures and the shift towards them in governance? 2. What are the primary governance challenges posed by the development of new internet infrastructures and governance models? 3. How do existing regulatory frameworks like GDPR, the AI Act, and NIS2 address the challenges and opportunities presented by new internet infrastructures and respective governance models?
_Expected Outcomes_:
- A comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities presented by new internet infrastructures and the regulatory shift towards them - MSM implications. - Insight into how existing regulatory frameworks, including the MSM, can adapt to these emerging technologies. - Enhanced dialogue among stakeholders on the future of multistakeholder Internet governance.
Kind regards Hadia Elminiawi Eng. Hadia Elminiawi (M.Sc.) Chief Expert on International Policies National Telecom Regulatory Authority of Egypt (NTRA) Building 124, Smart Village, Cairo-Alex Desert Road, Giza, Egypt. Tel: 202 3534-4392 Mail: Hadia@tra.gov.eg
Thank you Vanda for your insights. I totally agree with you. Hadia On Thursday, August 8, 2024 at 12:31:04 AM GMT+3, Vanda Scartezini via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote: Dear all In my view, I liked the ccNSO and ALAC proposals. They can merge or not. The advantage of merging is a broader overview for WSIS + 20. The IPC proposal is, in my view, more related to constant improvement and holistic review since mechanisms shall normally evolve. In the same way, the Registries suggestion is more of an internal discussion on how to facilitate domain owners to progress. Thanks for sharing, Hadia. Vanda From:Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, 6 August 2024 at 10:27 To: cpwg@icann.org <cpwg@icann.org>, Joanna Kulesza <joannakulesza@gmail.com>, Joanna Kulesza <joanna_kulesza@wpia.uni.lodz.pl>, pariesfandiari@gmail.com <pariesfandiari@gmail.com> Cc: Avri Doria <avri.doria@board.icann.org>, Justine Chew <justine.chew@gmail.com> Subject: [CPWG] Suggestion to merge AT-Large/ALAC and ccNSO ICANN81 proposed sessions Dear All, There has been a suggestion proposed at the SOAC-Leaders-ICANN Meeting-Planning to merge both the ALAC and ccNSO sessions into one session along the lines “ICANN's role with respect to new InternetInfrastructures being proposed nationally and internationally" please take a look and let me know what you think? I have included both proposals here to ease the comparison. You can also find all proposals at :https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ICANN81+Community+Session%3A+SO+... ccNSO proposal The ccNSO Council suggests a plenary on the topic of the WSIS+20
Review and what ICANN (the community and the organisation) can do to help advertise and preserve ICANN’s multi-stakeholder model, and the broader multi-stakeholder internet governance approach, during the Review.
ICANN is working with the community to reflect on lessons learned in the GDC process during 2023-2024, and developing a strategy for the role ICANN and its community can play during the WSIS+20 review in 2024 and 2025. By the time ICANN81 rolls around, this strategy should be well developed, and it will be time to further mobilise the ICANN community around the role it can play in this important work.
The main outcomes of such a session should be that:
* The ICANN community is well informed about the strategic approach to the WSIS+20 Review, and what role individual organisations and communities can play * The ICANN community is mobilised to play the roles they can play as part of the Review
A secondary outcome would be the sharing of greater insight about where the WSIS+20 review is at, though this can be covered in the Geopolitical session.
At-Large/ALAC Proposal _Working Title_: Shifting Paradigms: Multistakeholderism, Geopolitics,International Law, and New Internet Infrastructures.
_Objective/Aims_: To explore the intersections of geopolitics, international law, and emerging internet infrastructures. Key topics include the reshaping of the multistakeholder model, implications for new internet infrastructures, and data governance. The discussion will reference the2024 United States International Cyberspace & Digital Policy
Strategy, EU's GDPR, the AI Act, and NIS2. This session is crucial for end users,regulators, policymakers, technologists, legal experts, academics, andother stakeholders in the Interne
governance community. It emphasizesthe link between infrastructure governance and data management from theend user perspective, highlighting the importance of user-centricapproaches in
shaping the future of internet infrastructures.
_Proposed Speakers_:
- Vint Cerf, Internet Pioneer - Leon Sanchez, ICANN Board Member - Jorge Cancio, Deputy Head of the International Relations Team at theFederal Office of Communications (OFCOM); GAC Switzerland - Pari Esfandiari, ALAC/EURALO, Global TechnoPolitics Forum - Susan Chalmers, Internet Policy Specialist, US Department ofCommerce, NTIA - Berna Akçalı Gür, Lecturer, CCLS Queen Mary University of London,Associate Research Fellow at UNU-CRIS Digital Cluster - John Crain, ICANN SVP & Chief Technology Officer
_Moderator:_ Joanna Kulesza, ALAC Liaison to the GAC
_Scoping Questions_:
1. How should the multistakeholder model evolve to accommodate new internet infrastructures and the shift towards them in governance? 2. What are the primary governance challenges posed by the development of new internet infrastructures and governance models? 3. How do existing regulatory frameworks like GDPR, the AI Act, and NIS2 address the challenges and opportunities presented by new internet infrastructures and respective governance models?
_Expected Outcomes_:
- A comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities presented by new internet infrastructures and the regulatory shift towards them - MSM implications. - Insight into how existing regulatory frameworks, including the MSM,can adapt to these emerging technologies. - Enhanced dialogue among stakeholders on the future of multistakeholderInternet governance.
Kind regards Hadia Elminiawi Eng. Hadia Elminiawi (M.Sc.) Chief Expert on International Policies National Telecom Regulatory Authority of Egypt (NTRA) Building 124, Smart Village, Cairo-Alex Desert Road, Giza, Egypt. Tel: 202 3534-4392 Mail: Hadia@tra.gov.eg _______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list -- cpwg@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to cpwg-leave@icann.org _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Dear Hadia, Thank you for sharing the proposals. I support the merger of the ALAC and ccNSO sessions into a single session focused on "ICANN's role with respect to new Internet infrastructures being proposed nationally and internationally." I believe this consolidated approach will foster a more comprehensive and impactful discussion on the topic. I look forward to integrating the WSIS+20 discussion into the broader perspective on the shift to infrastructure in internet governance and the emergence of new internet infrastructures. When would be a good time to discuss the scoping questions and potential speakers for the joint session? Best regards, Joanna Kulesza, PhD tenured professor of international law and Internet governance Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Lodz Kopcinskiego Street 8/12, 90-232 Lodz, Poland publications: https://unilodz.academia.edu/JoannaKulesza/ website: https://pl.linkedin.com/in/kuleszajoanna On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 at 15:26, Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi < Hadia@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Dear All,
There has been a suggestion proposed at the SOAC-Leaders-ICANN Meeting-Planning to merge both the ALAC and ccNSO sessions into one session along the lines “ICANN's role with respect to new Internet Infrastructures being proposed nationally and internationally" please take a look and let me know what you think?
I have included both proposals here to ease the comparison. You can also find all proposals at : https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ICANN81+Community+Session%3A+SO+...
*ccNSO proposal*
The ccNSO Council suggests a plenary on the topic of the WSIS+20
Review and what ICANN (the community and the organisation) can do to help advertise and preserve ICANN’s multi-stakeholder model, and the broader multi-stakeholder internet governance approach, during the Review.
ICANN is working with the community to reflect on lessons learned in the GDC process during 2023-2024, and developing a strategy for the role ICANN and its community can play during the WSIS+20 review in 2024 and 2025. By the time ICANN81 rolls around, this strategy should be well developed, and it will be time to further mobilise the ICANN community around the role it can play in this important work.
*The main outcomes of such a session should be that:*
* The ICANN community is well informed about the strategic approach to the WSIS+20 Review, and what role individual organisations and communities can play * The ICANN community is mobilised to play the roles they can play as part of the Review
A secondary outcome would be the sharing of greater insight about where the WSIS+20 review is at, though this can be covered in the Geopolitical session.
*At-Large/ALAC Proposal*
_Working Title_: Shifting Paradigms: Multistakeholderism, Geopolitics, International Law, and New Internet Infrastructures.
_Objective/Aims_: To explore the intersections of geopolitics, international law, and
emerging internet infrastructures. Key topics include the reshaping of
the multistakeholder model, implications for new internet infrastructures, and data governance. The discussion will reference the 2024 United States International Cyberspace & Digital Policy
Strategy, EU's GDPR, the AI Act, and NIS2. This session is crucial for end users, regulators, policymakers, technologists, legal experts, academics, and other stakeholders in the Interne
governance community. It emphasizes the link between infrastructure governance and data management from the end user perspective, highlighting the importance of user-centric approaches in
shaping the future of internet infrastructures.
_Proposed Speakers_:
- Vint Cerf, Internet Pioneer - Leon Sanchez, ICANN Board Member - Jorge Cancio, Deputy Head of the International Relations Team at the Federal
Office of Communications (OFCOM); GAC Switzerland
- Pari Esfandiari, ALAC/EURALO, Global TechnoPolitics Forum - Susan Chalmers, Internet Policy Specialist, US Department of Commerce, NTIA - Berna Akçalı Gür, Lecturer, CCLS Queen Mary University of London, Associate Research Fellow at UNU-CRIS Digital Cluster - John Crain, ICANN SVP & Chief Technology Officer
_Moderator:_ Joanna Kulesza, ALAC Liaison to the GAC
_Scoping Questions_:
1. How should the multistakeholder model evolve to accommodate new internet infrastructures and the shift towards them in governance? 2. What are the primary governance challenges posed by the development of new internet infrastructures and governance models? 3. How do existing regulatory frameworks like GDPR, the AI Act, and NIS2 address the challenges and opportunities presented by new internet infrastructures and respective governance models?
_Expected Outcomes_:
- A comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities presented by new internet infrastructures and the regulatory shift towards them - MSM implications. - Insight into how existing regulatory frameworks, including the MSM, can adapt to these emerging technologies. - Enhanced dialogue among stakeholders on the future of multistakeholder Internet governance.
Kind regards
Hadia Elminiawi
Eng. Hadia Elminiawi (M.Sc.)
Chief Expert on International Policies
National Telecom Regulatory Authority of Egypt (NTRA)
Building 124, Smart Village, Cairo-Alex Desert Road, Giza, Egypt.
Tel: 202 3534-4392
Mail: Hadia@tra.gov.eg
+1 for the merger. Best Alberto Soto De: Joanna Kulesza via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> Enviado el: jueves, 8 de agosto de 2024 13:38 Para: Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi <Hadia@tra.gov.eg> CC: cpwg@icann.org; Joanna Kulesza <joanna_kulesza@wpia.uni.lodz.pl>; Avri Doria <avri.doria@board.icann.org>; Justine Chew <justine.chew@gmail.com> Asunto: [CPWG] Re: Suggestion to merge AT-Large/ALAC and ccNSO ICANN81 proposed sessions Dear Hadia, Thank you for sharing the proposals. I support the merger of the ALAC and ccNSO sessions into a single session focused on "ICANN's role with respect to new Internet infrastructures being proposed nationally and internationally." I believe this consolidated approach will foster a more comprehensive and impactful discussion on the topic. I look forward to integrating the WSIS+20 discussion into the broader perspective on the shift to infrastructure in internet governance and the emergence of new internet infrastructures. When would be a good time to discuss the scoping questions and potential speakers for the joint session? Best regards, Joanna Kulesza, PhD tenured professor of international law and Internet governance Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Lodz Kopcinskiego Street 8/12, 90-232 Lodz, Poland <https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/mail-sig/AIorK4x49xsf4YzpbOZseeuv6qVBZ_zKr...> publications: https://unilodz.academia.edu/JoannaKulesza/ website: https://pl.linkedin.com/in/kuleszajoanna On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 at 15:26, Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi <Hadia@tra.gov.eg <mailto:Hadia@tra.gov.eg> > wrote: Dear All, There has been a suggestion proposed at the SOAC-Leaders-ICANN Meeting-Planning to merge both the ALAC and ccNSO sessions into one session along the lines “ICANN's role with respect to new Internet Infrastructures being proposed nationally and internationally" please take a look and let me know what you think? I have included both proposals here to ease the comparison. You can also find all proposals at : https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ICANN81+Community+Session%3A+SO+... ccNSO proposal The ccNSO Council suggests a plenary on the topic of the WSIS+20
Review and what ICANN (the community and the organisation) can do to help advertise and preserve ICANN’s multi-stakeholder model, and the broader multi-stakeholder internet governance approach, during the Review.
ICANN is working with the community to reflect on lessons learned in the GDC process during 2023-2024, and developing a strategy for the role ICANN and its community can play during the WSIS+20 review in 2024 and 2025. By the time ICANN81 rolls around, this strategy should be well developed, and it will be time to further mobilise the ICANN community around the role it can play in this important work.
The main outcomes of such a session should be that:
* The ICANN community is well informed about the strategic approach to the WSIS+20 Review, and what role individual organisations and communities can play * The ICANN community is mobilised to play the roles they can play as part of the Review
A secondary outcome would be the sharing of greater insight about where the WSIS+20 review is at, though this can be covered in the Geopolitical session.
At-Large/ALAC Proposal _Working Title_: Shifting Paradigms: Multistakeholderism, Geopolitics, International Law, and New Internet Infrastructures.
_Objective/Aims_: To explore the intersections of geopolitics, international law, and emerging internet infrastructures. Key topics include the reshaping of the multistakeholder model, implications for new internet infrastructures, and data governance. The discussion will reference the 2024 United States International Cyberspace & Digital Policy
Strategy, EU's GDPR, the AI Act, and NIS2. This session is crucial for end users, regulators, policymakers, technologists, legal experts, academics, and other stakeholders in the Interne
governance community. It emphasizes the link between infrastructure governance and data management from the end user perspective, highlighting the importance of user-centric approaches in
shaping the future of internet infrastructures.
_Proposed Speakers_:
- Vint Cerf, Internet Pioneer - Leon Sanchez, ICANN Board Member - Jorge Cancio, Deputy Head of the International Relations Team at the Federal Office of Communications (OFCOM); GAC Switzerland - Pari Esfandiari, ALAC/EURALO, Global TechnoPolitics Forum - Susan Chalmers, Internet Policy Specialist, US Department of Commerce, NTIA - Berna Akçalı Gür, Lecturer, CCLS Queen Mary University of London, Associate Research Fellow at UNU-CRIS Digital Cluster - John Crain, ICANN SVP & Chief Technology Officer
_Moderator:_ Joanna Kulesza, ALAC Liaison to the GAC
_Scoping Questions_:
1. How should the multistakeholder model evolve to accommodate new internet infrastructures and the shift towards them in governance? 2. What are the primary governance challenges posed by the development of new internet infrastructures and governance models? 3. How do existing regulatory frameworks like GDPR, the AI Act, and NIS2 address the challenges and opportunities presented by new internet infrastructures and respective governance models?
_Expected Outcomes_:
- A comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities presented by new internet infrastructures and the regulatory shift towards them - MSM implications. - Insight into how existing regulatory frameworks, including the MSM, can adapt to these emerging technologies. - Enhanced dialogue among stakeholders on the future of multistakeholder Internet governance.
Kind regards Hadia Elminiawi Eng. Hadia Elminiawi (M.Sc.) Chief Expert on International Policies National Telecom Regulatory Authority of Egypt (NTRA) Building 124, Smart Village, Cairo-Alex Desert Road, Giza, Egypt. Tel: 202 3534-4392 Mail: Hadia@tra.gov.eg <mailto:Hadia@tra.gov.eg>
Great idea! On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 7:16 AM Joanna Kulesza via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:
Dear Hadia,
Thank you for sharing the proposals. I support the merger of the ALAC and ccNSO sessions into a single session focused on "ICANN's role with respect to new Internet infrastructures being proposed nationally and internationally." I believe this consolidated approach will foster a more comprehensive and impactful discussion on the topic.
I look forward to integrating the WSIS+20 discussion into the broader perspective on the shift to infrastructure in internet governance and the emergence of new internet infrastructures. When would be a good time to discuss the scoping questions and potential speakers for the joint session?
Best regards, Joanna Kulesza, PhD tenured professor of international law and Internet governance Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Lodz Kopcinskiego Street 8/12, 90-232 Lodz, Poland
publications: https://unilodz.academia.edu/JoannaKulesza/ website: https://pl.linkedin.com/in/kuleszajoanna
On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 at 15:26, Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi < Hadia@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Dear All,
There has been a suggestion proposed at the SOAC-Leaders-ICANN Meeting-Planning to merge both the ALAC and ccNSO sessions into one session along the lines “ICANN's role with respect to new Internet Infrastructures being proposed nationally and internationally" please take a look and let me know what you think?
I have included both proposals here to ease the comparison. You can also find all proposals at : https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ICANN81+Community+Session%3A+SO+...
*ccNSO proposal*
The ccNSO Council suggests a plenary on the topic of the WSIS+20
Review and what ICANN (the community and the organisation) can do to help advertise and preserve ICANN’s multi-stakeholder model, and the broader multi-stakeholder internet governance approach, during the Review.
ICANN is working with the community to reflect on lessons learned in the GDC process during 2023-2024, and developing a strategy for the role ICANN and its community can play during the WSIS+20 review in 2024 and 2025. By the time ICANN81 rolls around, this strategy should be well developed, and it will be time to further mobilise the ICANN community around the role it can play in this important work.
*The main outcomes of such a session should be that:*
* The ICANN community is well informed about the strategic approach to the WSIS+20 Review, and what role individual organisations and communities can play * The ICANN community is mobilised to play the roles they can play as part of the Review
A secondary outcome would be the sharing of greater insight about where the WSIS+20 review is at, though this can be covered in the Geopolitical session.
*At-Large/ALAC Proposal*
_Working Title_: Shifting Paradigms: Multistakeholderism, Geopolitics, International Law, and New Internet Infrastructures.
_Objective/Aims_: To explore the intersections of geopolitics, international law, and
emerging internet infrastructures. Key topics include the reshaping of
the multistakeholder model, implications for new internet infrastructures, and data governance. The discussion will reference the 2024 United States International Cyberspace & Digital Policy
Strategy, EU's GDPR, the AI Act, and NIS2. This session is crucial for end users, regulators, policymakers, technologists, legal experts, academics, and other stakeholders in the Interne
governance community. It emphasizes the link between infrastructure governance and data management from the end user perspective, highlighting the importance of user-centric approaches in
shaping the future of internet infrastructures.
_Proposed Speakers_:
- Vint Cerf, Internet Pioneer - Leon Sanchez, ICANN Board Member - Jorge Cancio, Deputy Head of the International Relations Team at the Federal
Office of Communications (OFCOM); GAC Switzerland
- Pari Esfandiari, ALAC/EURALO, Global TechnoPolitics Forum - Susan Chalmers, Internet Policy Specialist, US Department of Commerce, NTIA - Berna Akçalı Gür, Lecturer, CCLS Queen Mary University of London, Associate Research Fellow at UNU-CRIS Digital Cluster - John Crain, ICANN SVP & Chief Technology Officer
_Moderator:_ Joanna Kulesza, ALAC Liaison to the GAC
_Scoping Questions_:
1. How should the multistakeholder model evolve to accommodate new internet infrastructures and the shift towards them in governance? 2. What are the primary governance challenges posed by the development of new internet infrastructures and governance models? 3. How do existing regulatory frameworks like GDPR, the AI Act, and NIS2 address the challenges and opportunities presented by new internet infrastructures and respective governance models?
_Expected Outcomes_:
- A comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities presented by new internet infrastructures and the regulatory shift towards them - MSM implications. - Insight into how existing regulatory frameworks, including the MSM, can adapt to these emerging technologies. - Enhanced dialogue among stakeholders on the future of multistakeholder Internet governance.
Kind regards
Hadia Elminiawi
Eng. Hadia Elminiawi (M.Sc.)
Chief Expert on International Policies
National Telecom Regulatory Authority of Egypt (NTRA)
Building 124, Smart Village, Cairo-Alex Desert Road, Giza, Egypt.
Tel: 202 3534-4392
Mail: Hadia@tra.gov.eg
_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list -- cpwg@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to cpwg-leave@icann.org
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
All, As mentioned at the CPWG call of 7th August where Hadia brought this up, please note that *this discussion had already taken place at the At-Large ICANN81 Planning Committee call on Tuesday, 6th August*, and we had resolved to move forward with a merger attempt of the ALAC and ccNSO proposals. However, please also note that it remains subject to a decision of the SOAC Chairs that is expected to happen shortly. Also, any outcome at the SOAC Chairs' level which may require further action by us will be discussed by the At-Large ICANN81 Planning Committee and via the CPWG. Thank you, Justine On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 at 02:28, Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard@gmail.com> wrote:
Great idea!
On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 7:16 AM Joanna Kulesza via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:
Dear Hadia,
Thank you for sharing the proposals. I support the merger of the ALAC and ccNSO sessions into a single session focused on "ICANN's role with respect to new Internet infrastructures being proposed nationally and internationally." I believe this consolidated approach will foster a more comprehensive and impactful discussion on the topic.
I look forward to integrating the WSIS+20 discussion into the broader perspective on the shift to infrastructure in internet governance and the emergence of new internet infrastructures. When would be a good time to discuss the scoping questions and potential speakers for the joint session?
Best regards, Joanna Kulesza, PhD tenured professor of international law and Internet governance Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Lodz Kopcinskiego Street 8/12, 90-232 Lodz, Poland
publications: https://unilodz.academia.edu/JoannaKulesza/ website: https://pl.linkedin.com/in/kuleszajoanna
On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 at 15:26, Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi < Hadia@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Dear All,
There has been a suggestion proposed at the SOAC-Leaders-ICANN Meeting-Planning to merge both the ALAC and ccNSO sessions into one session along the lines “ICANN's role with respect to new Internet Infrastructures being proposed nationally and internationally" please take a look and let me know what you think?
I have included both proposals here to ease the comparison. You can also find all proposals at : https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ICANN81+Community+Session%3A+SO+...
*ccNSO proposal*
The ccNSO Council suggests a plenary on the topic of the WSIS+20
Review and what ICANN (the community and the organisation) can do to help advertise and preserve ICANN’s multi-stakeholder model, and the broader multi-stakeholder internet governance approach, during the Review.
ICANN is working with the community to reflect on lessons learned in the GDC process during 2023-2024, and developing a strategy for the role ICANN and its community can play during the WSIS+20 review in 2024 and 2025. By the time ICANN81 rolls around, this strategy should be well developed, and it will be time to further mobilise the ICANN community around the role it can play in this important work.
*The main outcomes of such a session should be that:*
* The ICANN community is well informed about the strategic approach to the WSIS+20 Review, and what role individual organisations and communities can play * The ICANN community is mobilised to play the roles they can play as part of the Review
A secondary outcome would be the sharing of greater insight about where the WSIS+20 review is at, though this can be covered in the Geopolitical session.
*At-Large/ALAC Proposal*
_Working Title_: Shifting Paradigms: Multistakeholderism, Geopolitics, International Law, and New Internet Infrastructures.
_Objective/Aims_: To explore the intersections of geopolitics, international law, and
emerging internet infrastructures. Key topics include the reshaping of
the multistakeholder model, implications for new internet infrastructures, and data governance. The discussion will reference the 2024 United States International Cyberspace & Digital Policy
Strategy, EU's GDPR, the AI Act, and NIS2. This session is crucial for end users, regulators, policymakers, technologists, legal experts, academics, and other stakeholders in the Interne
governance community. It emphasizes the link between infrastructure governance and data management from the end user perspective, highlighting the importance of user-centric approaches in
shaping the future of internet infrastructures.
_Proposed Speakers_:
- Vint Cerf, Internet Pioneer - Leon Sanchez, ICANN Board Member - Jorge Cancio, Deputy Head of the International Relations Team at
the Federal Office of Communications (OFCOM); GAC Switzerland
- Pari Esfandiari, ALAC/EURALO, Global TechnoPolitics Forum - Susan Chalmers, Internet Policy Specialist, US Department of Commerce, NTIA - Berna Akçalı Gür, Lecturer, CCLS Queen Mary University of London, Associate Research Fellow at UNU-CRIS Digital Cluster - John Crain, ICANN SVP & Chief Technology Officer
_Moderator:_ Joanna Kulesza, ALAC Liaison to the GAC
_Scoping Questions_:
1. How should the multistakeholder model evolve to accommodate new internet infrastructures and the shift towards them in governance? 2. What are the primary governance challenges posed by the development of new internet infrastructures and governance models? 3. How do existing regulatory frameworks like GDPR, the AI Act, and NIS2 address the challenges and opportunities presented by new internet infrastructures and respective governance models?
_Expected Outcomes_:
- A comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities presented by new internet infrastructures and the regulatory shift towards them - MSM implications. - Insight into how existing regulatory frameworks, including the MSM, can adapt to these emerging technologies. - Enhanced dialogue among stakeholders on the future of multistakeholder Internet governance.
Kind regards
Hadia Elminiawi
Eng. Hadia Elminiawi (M.Sc.)
Chief Expert on International Policies
National Telecom Regulatory Authority of Egypt (NTRA)
Building 124, Smart Village, Cairo-Alex Desert Road, Giza, Egypt.
Tel: 202 3534-4392
Mail: Hadia@tra.gov.eg
_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list -- cpwg@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to cpwg-leave@icann.org
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Apologies, I meant to say, "... any outcome at the SOAC Chairs' level which may require further action by us will be discussed by the At-Large ICANN81 Planning Committee and NOT via the CPWG." Thanks, Justine On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 at 02:51, Justine Chew <justine.chew.icann@gmail.com> wrote:
All,
As mentioned at the CPWG call of 7th August where Hadia brought this up, please note that *this discussion had already taken place at the At-Large ICANN81 Planning Committee call on Tuesday, 6th August*, and we had resolved to move forward with a merger attempt of the ALAC and ccNSO proposals. However, please also note that it remains subject to a decision of the SOAC Chairs that is expected to happen shortly. Also, any outcome at the SOAC Chairs' level which may require further action by us will be discussed by the At-Large ICANN81 Planning Committee and NOT via the CPWG.
Thank you, Justine
On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 at 02:28, Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard@gmail.com> wrote:
Great idea!
On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 7:16 AM Joanna Kulesza via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:
Dear Hadia,
Thank you for sharing the proposals. I support the merger of the ALAC and ccNSO sessions into a single session focused on "ICANN's role with respect to new Internet infrastructures being proposed nationally and internationally." I believe this consolidated approach will foster a more comprehensive and impactful discussion on the topic.
I look forward to integrating the WSIS+20 discussion into the broader perspective on the shift to infrastructure in internet governance and the emergence of new internet infrastructures. When would be a good time to discuss the scoping questions and potential speakers for the joint session?
Best regards, Joanna Kulesza, PhD tenured professor of international law and Internet governance Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Lodz Kopcinskiego Street 8/12, 90-232 Lodz, Poland
publications: https://unilodz.academia.edu/JoannaKulesza/ website: https://pl.linkedin.com/in/kuleszajoanna
On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 at 15:26, Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi < Hadia@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Dear All,
There has been a suggestion proposed at the SOAC-Leaders-ICANN Meeting-Planning to merge both the ALAC and ccNSO sessions into one session along the lines “ICANN's role with respect to new Internet Infrastructures being proposed nationally and internationally" please take a look and let me know what you think?
I have included both proposals here to ease the comparison. You can also find all proposals at : https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ICANN81+Community+Session%3A+SO+...
*ccNSO proposal*
The ccNSO Council suggests a plenary on the topic of the WSIS+20
Review and what ICANN (the community and the organisation) can do to help advertise and preserve ICANN’s multi-stakeholder model, and the broader multi-stakeholder internet governance approach, during the Review.
ICANN is working with the community to reflect on lessons learned in the GDC process during 2023-2024, and developing a strategy for the role ICANN and its community can play during the WSIS+20 review in 2024 and 2025. By the time ICANN81 rolls around, this strategy should be well developed, and it will be time to further mobilise the ICANN community around the role it can play in this important work.
*The main outcomes of such a session should be that:*
* The ICANN community is well informed about the strategic approach to the WSIS+20 Review, and what role individual organisations and communities can play * The ICANN community is mobilised to play the roles they can play as part of the Review
A secondary outcome would be the sharing of greater insight about where the WSIS+20 review is at, though this can be covered in the Geopolitical session.
*At-Large/ALAC Proposal*
_Working Title_: Shifting Paradigms: Multistakeholderism, Geopolitics, International Law, and New Internet Infrastructures.
_Objective/Aims_: To explore the intersections of geopolitics, international law, and
emerging internet infrastructures. Key topics include the reshaping of
the multistakeholder model, implications for new internet infrastructures, and data governance. The discussion will reference the 2024 United States International Cyberspace & Digital Policy
Strategy, EU's GDPR, the AI Act, and NIS2. This session is crucial for end users, regulators, policymakers, technologists, legal experts, academics, and other stakeholders in the Interne
governance community. It emphasizes the link between infrastructure governance and data management from the end user perspective, highlighting the importance of user-centric approaches in
shaping the future of internet infrastructures.
_Proposed Speakers_:
- Vint Cerf, Internet Pioneer - Leon Sanchez, ICANN Board Member - Jorge Cancio, Deputy Head of the International Relations Team at
the Federal Office of Communications (OFCOM); GAC Switzerland
- Pari Esfandiari, ALAC/EURALO, Global TechnoPolitics Forum - Susan Chalmers, Internet Policy Specialist, US Department of Commerce, NTIA - Berna Akçalı Gür, Lecturer, CCLS Queen Mary University of London, Associate Research Fellow at UNU-CRIS Digital Cluster - John Crain, ICANN SVP & Chief Technology Officer
_Moderator:_ Joanna Kulesza, ALAC Liaison to the GAC
_Scoping Questions_:
1. How should the multistakeholder model evolve to accommodate new internet infrastructures and the shift towards them in governance? 2. What are the primary governance challenges posed by the development of new internet infrastructures and governance models? 3. How do existing regulatory frameworks like GDPR, the AI Act, and NIS2 address the challenges and opportunities presented by new internet infrastructures and respective governance models?
_Expected Outcomes_:
- A comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities presented by new internet infrastructures and the regulatory shift towards them - MSM implications. - Insight into how existing regulatory frameworks, including the MSM, can adapt to these emerging technologies. - Enhanced dialogue among stakeholders on the future of multistakeholder Internet governance.
Kind regards
Hadia Elminiawi
Eng. Hadia Elminiawi (M.Sc.)
Chief Expert on International Policies
National Telecom Regulatory Authority of Egypt (NTRA)
Building 124, Smart Village, Cairo-Alex Desert Road, Giza, Egypt.
Tel: 202 3534-4392
Mail: Hadia@tra.gov.eg
_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list -- cpwg@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to cpwg-leave@icann.org
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
I assume my support for the merger was raised as I requested in the planning call Justine mentioned, but I wanted to note it here as well... <https://about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_me...> Cheryl Langdon-Orr about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr <https://about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_me...> On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 at 04:52, Justine Chew via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:
All,
As mentioned at the CPWG call of 7th August where Hadia brought this up, please note that *this discussion had already taken place at the At-Large ICANN81 Planning Committee call on Tuesday, 6th August*, and we had resolved to move forward with a merger attempt of the ALAC and ccNSO proposals. However, please also note that it remains subject to a decision of the SOAC Chairs that is expected to happen shortly. Also, any outcome at the SOAC Chairs' level which may require further action by us will be discussed by the At-Large ICANN81 Planning Committee and via the CPWG.
Thank you, Justine
On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 at 02:28, Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard@gmail.com> wrote:
Great idea!
On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 7:16 AM Joanna Kulesza via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:
Dear Hadia,
Thank you for sharing the proposals. I support the merger of the ALAC and ccNSO sessions into a single session focused on "ICANN's role with respect to new Internet infrastructures being proposed nationally and internationally." I believe this consolidated approach will foster a more comprehensive and impactful discussion on the topic.
I look forward to integrating the WSIS+20 discussion into the broader perspective on the shift to infrastructure in internet governance and the emergence of new internet infrastructures. When would be a good time to discuss the scoping questions and potential speakers for the joint session?
Best regards, Joanna Kulesza, PhD tenured professor of international law and Internet governance Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Lodz Kopcinskiego Street 8/12, 90-232 Lodz, Poland
publications: https://unilodz.academia.edu/JoannaKulesza/ website: https://pl.linkedin.com/in/kuleszajoanna
On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 at 15:26, Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi < Hadia@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Dear All,
There has been a suggestion proposed at the SOAC-Leaders-ICANN Meeting-Planning to merge both the ALAC and ccNSO sessions into one session along the lines “ICANN's role with respect to new Internet Infrastructures being proposed nationally and internationally" please take a look and let me know what you think?
I have included both proposals here to ease the comparison. You can also find all proposals at : https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ICANN81+Community+Session%3A+SO+...
*ccNSO proposal*
The ccNSO Council suggests a plenary on the topic of the WSIS+20
Review and what ICANN (the community and the organisation) can do to help advertise and preserve ICANN’s multi-stakeholder model, and the broader multi-stakeholder internet governance approach, during the Review.
ICANN is working with the community to reflect on lessons learned in the GDC process during 2023-2024, and developing a strategy for the role ICANN and its community can play during the WSIS+20 review in 2024 and 2025. By the time ICANN81 rolls around, this strategy should be well developed, and it will be time to further mobilise the ICANN community around the role it can play in this important work.
*The main outcomes of such a session should be that:*
* The ICANN community is well informed about the strategic approach to the WSIS+20 Review, and what role individual organisations and communities can play * The ICANN community is mobilised to play the roles they can play as part of the Review
A secondary outcome would be the sharing of greater insight about where the WSIS+20 review is at, though this can be covered in the Geopolitical session.
*At-Large/ALAC Proposal*
_Working Title_: Shifting Paradigms: Multistakeholderism, Geopolitics, International Law, and New Internet Infrastructures.
_Objective/Aims_: To explore the intersections of geopolitics, international law, and
emerging internet infrastructures. Key topics include the reshaping of
the multistakeholder model, implications for new internet infrastructures, and data governance. The discussion will reference the 2024 United States International Cyberspace & Digital Policy
Strategy, EU's GDPR, the AI Act, and NIS2. This session is crucial for end users, regulators, policymakers, technologists, legal experts, academics, and other stakeholders in the Interne
governance community. It emphasizes the link between infrastructure governance and data management from the end user perspective, highlighting the importance of user-centric approaches in
shaping the future of internet infrastructures.
_Proposed Speakers_:
- Vint Cerf, Internet Pioneer - Leon Sanchez, ICANN Board Member - Jorge Cancio, Deputy Head of the International Relations Team at
the Federal Office of Communications (OFCOM); GAC Switzerland
- Pari Esfandiari, ALAC/EURALO, Global TechnoPolitics Forum - Susan Chalmers, Internet Policy Specialist, US Department of Commerce, NTIA - Berna Akçalı Gür, Lecturer, CCLS Queen Mary University of London, Associate Research Fellow at UNU-CRIS Digital Cluster - John Crain, ICANN SVP & Chief Technology Officer
_Moderator:_ Joanna Kulesza, ALAC Liaison to the GAC
_Scoping Questions_:
1. How should the multistakeholder model evolve to accommodate new internet infrastructures and the shift towards them in governance? 2. What are the primary governance challenges posed by the development of new internet infrastructures and governance models? 3. How do existing regulatory frameworks like GDPR, the AI Act, and NIS2 address the challenges and opportunities presented by new internet infrastructures and respective governance models?
_Expected Outcomes_:
- A comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities presented by new internet infrastructures and the regulatory shift towards them - MSM implications. - Insight into how existing regulatory frameworks, including the MSM, can adapt to these emerging technologies. - Enhanced dialogue among stakeholders on the future of multistakeholder Internet governance.
Kind regards
Hadia Elminiawi
Eng. Hadia Elminiawi (M.Sc.)
Chief Expert on International Policies
National Telecom Regulatory Authority of Egypt (NTRA)
Building 124, Smart Village, Cairo-Alex Desert Road, Giza, Egypt.
Tel: 202 3534-4392
Mail: Hadia@tra.gov.eg
_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list -- cpwg@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to cpwg-leave@icann.org
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list -- cpwg@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to cpwg-leave@icann.org
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
participants (9)
-
alberto＠soto.net.ar -
Cheryl Langdon-Orr -
Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi -
Hadia El Miniawi -
Joanna Kulesza -
Justine Chew -
Maureen Hilyard -
Vanda Scartezini -
Wolfgang Kleinwächter