Good afternoon. Thankyou, Noted, However, at such short notice, I am not able to comment in the format required by the document. I have every confidence that the ALAC participants in the EPDPs are doing their very best to make the best of a very difficult job. Notwithstanding, my considered position in this matter is to abstain. While I recognise that ALAC's participation in EPDP to date has been inspired by patient wisdom, seeking pragmatic compromise, I consider that commenting on the EPDP report at this time is no longer where we should be at. I have participated in aspects of ICANN's privacy policy in several capacities, for the past twenty years and have regrettably come to the conclusion that ICANN's Multi-stakeholder Model has – in this respect - failed. I see no merit any longer in sending back comments which are tweaks to questions that will without doubt be rejected by the EPDP and GNSO. Worse, I have observed over the years that a number of the contracted parties are simply 'playing the clock' (to adopt an expression from football) and have no intention of allowing ICANN to adopt a GDPR-compliant policy. The MSM adopted by the empowered community in the context of the Transition was not done to permit permanent procrastination of policy issues for the commercial interest of a 'consensus' within the GNSO. Enough is enough. I think that the ICANN Board should close down the EPDP and simply refer the matter back to ICANN Legal to resolve on the basis of their, by now, no doubt detailed knowledge of privacy policies and legislation world-wide, including GDPR. As things stand in this and other PDPs, ICANN's version of the MSM will bring the Multi-Stakeholder Model, into disrepute internationally. Regards CW Begin forwarded message: From: Evin Erdogdu via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> Subject: [CPWG] Call for Comments by Monday, 5 July: ALAC Statement on Initial Report of the Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data Team – PHASE 2A Date: 2 July 2021 at 23:16:37 CEST To: "cpwg@icann.org" <cpwg@icann.org> Reply-To: Evin Erdogdu <evin.erdogdu@icann.org> Hello CPWG members, Please provide comments, if any, on the draft ALAC Statement on Initial Report of the Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data Team – PHASE 2A https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=166265698 by Monday, 5 July: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_EPaFDv46r8HEq3Rj7fY0IZmkYy63zMiIIGPalF5... You may also provide comments on the At-Large workspace https://community.icann.org/x/YgPpCQ for the ALAC statement. Thank you, Evin Ashley Erdoğdu Policy Analyst Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) _______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org mailto:CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.