Dear All, Please see below important information for today’s CPWG discussion on Post-creation and Post-Transfer Locks within the context of the Transfer Policy Review PDP. A series of polls will be shown during the discussion. The questions and relevant document are available in Steinar’s note. Kind regards, Heidi From: CPWG <cpwg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> Reply to: Steinar Grøtterød <steinar@recito.no> Date: Tuesday, 8 March 2022 at 4:31 AM To: CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> Subject: [CPWG] At-Large Input to Post-creation and Post-Transfer Locks Dear all CPWG members, With the object to give background and a constructive discussion at the CPWG meeting, At-Large members in the GNSO Transfer Policy Review PDP have created a document focus on the PDP charter questions connected to Post-creation and Post-Transfer Locks. The Google document located at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ht1fl9LAiqCvJCHCvY5eWao_lOBdKmgpr7kChLgw... [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1Ht1fl9LAiqCvJ...> should give the CPWG members the needed information to participate in an informal “poll”: QUESTION TO BE DISCUSSED BY CPWG MEMBERS For the post-creation lock question What lock period will be of preference: * 10 days post-creation lock * 30 days post-creation lock * 60 days post-creation lock * Not sure * Abstain For the post-transfer lock question What lock period will be of preference: * 10 days post-transfer lock * 30 days post-transfer lock * 60 days post-transfer lock * Not sure * Abstain For the question regarding Registry Operator * Same policy for all Registry Operator * A Registry Operator MAY define a different transfer lock policy * Not sure * Abstain I kindly ask the CPWG members to review the Google document [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1Ht1fl9LAiqCvJ...>. The CPWG chair may decide when to put this on the CPWG agenda. Regards, Steinar Grøtterød