Daer Dr. Steinar Grøtterød, Hope you will have time to discuss the tabulated data in the next CPWG Meeting. Quick Note: It has been nicely noted that 30 day + 60 day = 61.9% which is good news. I have been reading the Regostrar Domains Under Management [DUM] tabulated data as: Group A: 0-5,000 : Zero to 30 Days - Attention Group B 5,001 - 50,000 7 days 60 days 5,001 - 50,000 24 hours 24 hours Group C: 50,001 - 100,000 60 days 60 days Group D: Has the maximum 7 Subgroups 100,001 - 999,999 30 days 30 days 100,001 - 999,999 60 days 60 days 100,001 - 999,999 60 days 30 days 100,001 - 999,999 No lock No lock - Attention 100,001 - 999,999 No lock 24 hours 100,001 - 999,999 60 days 30 days 100,001 - 999,999 60 days 60 days Group E: 60 Days is not seen here !!! 1-5 million No lock No lock - Attention 1-5 million 30 days 7 days 1-5 million 15 days 15 days 1-5 million 30 days 30 days Group F: 5 million + 60 days 30 days 5 million + 60 days 60 days 5 million + 60 days 30 days 5 million + No lock No lock - Attention 5 million + 30 days 30 days Into which group do the following top Domain Registrars given below belong to ? Domain.com Namecheap Bluehost HostGator Google Domains Hover GoDaddy Name.com Hostinger DreamHost HostPapa NameSilo Dynadot How many hazards did each group manage ? It has been nicely noted that 30 day + 60 day = 61.9% which is good news. In any case, I stand by the "worst - case design of 60 days" that is fully backed by the history. Hope such an anaylsis can happen some time as we move on with 60 days. Sincerely, Gopal T V 0 9840121302 https://vidwan.inflibnet.ac.in/profile/57545 https://www.facebook.com/gopal.tadepalli ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Dr. T V Gopal Professor Department of Computer Science and Engineering College of Engineering Anna University Chennai - 600 025, INDIA Ph : (Off) 22351723 Extn. 3340 (Res) 24454753 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ On 2021-12-04 13:11, Steinar Grøtterød via CPWG wrote:
Hi,
Attached is the Registrar survey connected to the inter-registrar 60 days lock questions.
Regards, Steinar Grøtterød
On 03/12/2021, 20:54, "GNSO-TPR on behalf of Owen Smigelski via GNSO-TPR" <gnso-tpr-bounces@icann.org on behalf of gnso-tpr@icann.org> wrote:
Hi all,
Attached is the document I shared during Tuesday’s meeting regarding RrSG member feedback regarding domain name locks at creation and transfer. As requested, I added a breakdown by registrar type and size. I was not able to find any correlation between either registrar size or type and the preferred lock period.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Regards,
Owen
_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.