Hi Donna, all, I think that your analysis is right, Donna. Given that the Charter does not say anything about no travel funding, we can’t really take it out. And – given that there are a lot of considerations to be considered – saying something about travel funding being allowed would need a lot of caveats, including on who makes the decision and on what grounds. Underlying this, I also still believe that travel funding should be the exception, not the rule, and should certainly not be automatic. In addition, I’d see a difficulty with telling bodies (ccNSO, GNSO, ICANN, PTI) to fund and more of a difficulty if funding came from ICANN or PTI because of a possible perception of capture. The idea of a recommendation in the report works for me, but my current feeling is that we would need to make clear that funding is a special case to ensure that the registry community is properly represented on the Customer Standing Committee. Thanks Martin From: CSC-Review [mailto:csc-review-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Austin, Donna via CSC-Review Sent: 15 December 2017 22:38 To: CSC-review@icann.org Subject: [CSC-Review] CSC Travel Support Hi All I’d really like to hear from everyone on the question of Travel Support for the CSC. Personally, I’m reluctant to codify travel support into the Charter because I don’t think this is the appropriate place to do so. However, I do think we could make a strong recommendation in the report that the restriction on travel support be lifted in light of the success of the CSC and that the CSC be encouraged to seek travel support through the ICANN budgeting process or whatever the appropriate mechanism is. Donna From: Maria Otanes [mailto:maria.otanes@icann.org] Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 10:33 AM To: Austin, Donna <Donna.Austin@team.neustar <mailto:Donna.Austin@team.neustar> >; CSC-review@icann.org <mailto:CSC-review@icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Ext] RE: Doodle Poll for next week? Importance: High Hi all, Please complete the doodle poll below at your earliest convenience. https://doodle.com/poll/9eerax8rpmqncfz9 Thanks, Ria From: "Austin, Donna" <Donna.Austin@team.neustar <mailto:Donna.Austin@team.neustar> > Date: Friday, December 15, 2017 at 12:28 PM To: Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org <mailto:maria.otanes@icann.org> >, "CSC-review@icann.org <mailto:CSC-review@icann.org> " <CSC-review@icann.org <mailto:CSC-review@icann.org> > Subject: [Ext] RE: Doodle Poll for next week? Ria Can you send out a doodle poll from Monday through Wednesday of next week please? Thanks Donna From: CSC-Review [mailto:csc-review-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Maria Otanes Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 1:44 PM To: CSC-review@icann.org <mailto:CSC-review@icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [CSC-Review] Doodle Poll for next week? Dear CSC Review Team, Thank you for your participation on the call today. As mentioned on the call, there were items you all need to discuss. Would you like me to set up a Doodle poll with options for next week? Is there a particular time/day that works best for you? Thanks, Ria _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Ria Otanes | Secretariat Operations Coordinator Email maria.otanes@icann.org <mailto:maria.otanes@icann.org> | Cell +1 202 679 5185 Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Washington, DC Office | EDT / UTC-5
