Next call: Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC
Dear CSC Charter Review Team, The next call is scheduled for Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC. A calendar invite was sent earlier today. Please find the latest draft attached. All the best, Ria _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Ria Otanes | Secretariat Operations Coordinator Email maria.otanes@icann.org | Cell +1 202 679 5185 Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Washington, DC Office | EDT / UTC-5
HI, Please find attached the most recent draft of the RAPs. Elaine On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org> wrote:
Dear CSC Charter Review Team,
The next call is scheduled for Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC. A calendar invite was sent earlier today.
Please find the latest draft attached.
All the best,
Ria
____________________________________________________________ ___________________________________
*Ria Otanes* | *Secretariat Operations Coordinator*
Email maria.otanes@icann.org | Cell +1 202 679 5185 <(202)%20679-5185>
I*nternet* C*orporation for *A*ssigned* N*ames** and *N*umbers*
*Washington, DC Office* | EDT / UTC-5
[image: /Users/maria.otanes/Library/Containers/com.microsoft.Outlook/Data/Library/Caches/Signatures/signature_1187332237]
_______________________________________________ CSC-Review mailing list CSC-Review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/csc-review
Hi all, I’m still struggling with this document! There still seems to be an assumption that the RAP kicks in because of a complaint that seems to show a systemic issue. Yet the charter identifies that the process is to allow the CSC to request correction of failings to meet the service levels and I would expect this to be the main reason for launching the RAP. The cumbersome wording proposed at the end of the first paragraph probably works, but I am a little concerned at the risk of limiting the action to where there is a “persistent performance issue, or an indication of a systemic problem.” The Charter does not apply these criteria, but simply says “ to undertake remedial action to address poor performance.” That might be a single serious service failure that has not been explained adequately – where, for example, PTI has not been able to explain how such a failure (or similar set of circumstances) might be prevented in the future. If the second paragraph (proposed for deletion) was intended to meet my concern that there should be some discussion before launching the RAP, it rather misses my point: my concern was all about a possible risk of breakdown of communications between the PTI and CSC (which might justifiably be the reason for recourse to the RAP!) where CSC pushes to start a RAP, without seeking to understand whether there were mitigating circumstances or simple fixes that meant further action was not necessary. This is probably covered in I. a), although this in itself appears to be focussed on identifying whether a complaint is systemic, not on a failure to meet the service levels. One final point: I get Allan’s point that this is a document for PTI. But wouldn’t we want any future operator to be (at least initially) bound to this process? Best Martin From: CSC-Review [mailto:csc-review-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Elaine Pruis Sent: 28 February 2018 02:51 To: Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org> Cc: CSC-review@icann.org Subject: Re: [CSC-Review] Next call: Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC HI, Please find attached the most recent draft of the RAPs. Elaine On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org <mailto:maria.otanes@icann.org> > wrote: Dear CSC Charter Review Team, The next call is scheduled for Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC. A calendar invite was sent earlier today. Please find the latest draft attached. All the best, Ria _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Ria Otanes | Secretariat Operations Coordinator Email maria.otanes@icann.org <mailto:maria.otanes@icann.org> | Cell +1 202 679 5185 <tel:(202)%20679-5185> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Washington, DC Office | EDT / UTC-5 _______________________________________________ CSC-Review mailing list CSC-Review@icann.org <mailto:CSC-Review@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/csc-review
Martin, Do you mind if I share your concerns with Allan and relevant ICANN staff? Kind regards, Bart From: CSC-Review <csc-review-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Martin Boyle via CSC-Review <CSC-review@icann.org> Reply-To: Martin Boyle <martin.boyle.hertford@ntlworld.com> Date: Wednesday 28 February 2018 at 22:50 To: 'Elaine Pruis' <elainepruis@gmail.com>, Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org> Cc: "CSC-review@icann.org" <CSC-review@icann.org> Subject: Re: [CSC-Review] Next call: Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC Hi all, I’m still struggling with this document! There still seems to be an assumption that the RAP kicks in because of a complaint that seems to show a systemic issue. Yet the charter identifies that the process is to allow the CSC to request correction of failings to meet the service levels and I would expect this to be the main reason for launching the RAP. The cumbersome wording proposed at the end of the first paragraph probably works, but I am a little concerned at the risk of limiting the action to where there is a “persistent performance issue, or an indication of a systemic problem.” The Charter does not apply these criteria, but simply says “ to undertake remedial action to address poor performance.” That might be a single serious service failure that has not been explained adequately – where, for example, PTI has not been able to explain how such a failure (or similar set of circumstances) might be prevented in the future. If the second paragraph (proposed for deletion) was intended to meet my concern that there should be some discussion before launching the RAP, it rather misses my point: my concern was all about a possible risk of breakdown of communications between the PTI and CSC (which might justifiably be the reason for recourse to the RAP!) where CSC pushes to start a RAP, without seeking to understand whether there were mitigating circumstances or simple fixes that meant further action was not necessary. This is probably covered in I. a), although this in itself appears to be focussed on identifying whether a complaint is systemic, not on a failure to meet the service levels. One final point: I get Allan’s point that this is a document for PTI. But wouldn’t we want any future operator to be (at least initially) bound to this process? Best Martin From: CSC-Review [mailto:csc-review-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Elaine Pruis Sent: 28 February 2018 02:51 To: Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org> Cc: CSC-review@icann.org Subject: Re: [CSC-Review] Next call: Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC HI, Please find attached the most recent draft of the RAPs. Elaine On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org> wrote: Dear CSC Charter Review Team, The next call is scheduled for Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC. A calendar invite was sent earlier today. Please find the latest draft attached. All the best, Ria _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Ria Otanes | Secretariat Operations Coordinator Email maria.otanes@icann.org | Cell +1 202 679 5185 Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Washington, DC Office | EDT / UTC-5 _______________________________________________ CSC-Review mailing list CSC-Review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/csc-review
Dear all, Please find included Martin’s comments on latest version of the RAP as forwarded by Elaine, Kind regards, Bart From: CSC-Review <csc-review-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Martin Boyle via CSC-Review <CSC-review@icann.org> Reply-To: Martin Boyle <martin.boyle.hertford@ntlworld.com> Date: Wednesday 28 February 2018 at 22:50 To: 'Elaine Pruis' <elainepruis@gmail.com>, Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org> Cc: "CSC-review@icann.org" <CSC-review@icann.org> Subject: Re: [CSC-Review] Next call: Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC Hi all, I’m still struggling with this document! There still seems to be an assumption that the RAP kicks in because of a complaint that seems to show a systemic issue. Yet the charter identifies that the process is to allow the CSC to request correction of failings to meet the service levels and I would expect this to be the main reason for launching the RAP. The cumbersome wording proposed at the end of the first paragraph probably works, but I am a little concerned at the risk of limiting the action to where there is a “persistent performance issue, or an indication of a systemic problem.” The Charter does not apply these criteria, but simply says “ to undertake remedial action to address poor performance.” That might be a single serious service failure that has not been explained adequately – where, for example, PTI has not been able to explain how such a failure (or similar set of circumstances) might be prevented in the future. If the second paragraph (proposed for deletion) was intended to meet my concern that there should be some discussion before launching the RAP, it rather misses my point: my concern was all about a possible risk of breakdown of communications between the PTI and CSC (which might justifiably be the reason for recourse to the RAP!) where CSC pushes to start a RAP, without seeking to understand whether there were mitigating circumstances or simple fixes that meant further action was not necessary. This is probably covered in I. a), although this in itself appears to be focussed on identifying whether a complaint is systemic, not on a failure to meet the service levels. One final point: I get Allan’s point that this is a document for PTI. But wouldn’t we want any future operator to be (at least initially) bound to this process? Best Martin From: CSC-Review [mailto:csc-review-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Elaine Pruis Sent: 28 February 2018 02:51 To: Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org> Cc: CSC-review@icann.org Subject: Re: [CSC-Review] Next call: Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC HI, Please find attached the most recent draft of the RAPs. Elaine On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org> wrote: Dear CSC Charter Review Team, The next call is scheduled for Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC. A calendar invite was sent earlier today. Please find the latest draft attached. All the best, Ria _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Ria Otanes | Secretariat Operations Coordinator Email maria.otanes@icann.org | Cell +1 202 679 5185 Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Washington, DC Office | EDT / UTC-5 _______________________________________________ CSC-Review mailing list CSC-Review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/csc-review
Dear all, Ac recording from yesterday’s call is below. https://participate.icann.org/p1uabfaukl7/ Best, Ria From: CSC-Review <csc-review-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org> Date: Friday, March 2, 2018 at 4:59 AM To: Samantha Eisner <Samantha.Eisner@icann.org>, Trang Nguyen <trang.nguyen@icann.org>, Allan MacGillivray <allan.macgillivray@cira.ca>, Elaine Pruis <elainepruis@gmail.com>, Naela Sarras <naela.sarras@iana.org> Cc: Amy Creamer <amy.creamer@icann.org>, "CSC-review@icann.org" <CSC-review@icann.org> Subject: [CSC-Review] FW: Next call: Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC Dear all, Please find included Martin’s comments on latest version of the RAP as forwarded by Elaine, Kind regards, Bart From: CSC-Review <csc-review-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Martin Boyle via CSC-Review <CSC-review@icann.org> Reply-To: Martin Boyle <martin.boyle.hertford@ntlworld.com> Date: Wednesday 28 February 2018 at 22:50 To: 'Elaine Pruis' <elainepruis@gmail.com>, Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org> Cc: "CSC-review@icann.org" <CSC-review@icann.org> Subject: Re: [CSC-Review] Next call: Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC Hi all, I’m still struggling with this document! There still seems to be an assumption that the RAP kicks in because of a complaint that seems to show a systemic issue. Yet the charter identifies that the process is to allow the CSC to request correction of failings to meet the service levels and I would expect this to be the main reason for launching the RAP. The cumbersome wording proposed at the end of the first paragraph probably works, but I am a little concerned at the risk of limiting the action to where there is a “persistent performance issue, or an indication of a systemic problem.” The Charter does not apply these criteria, but simply says “ to undertake remedial action to address poor performance.” That might be a single serious service failure that has not been explained adequately – where, for example, PTI has not been able to explain how such a failure (or similar set of circumstances) might be prevented in the future. If the second paragraph (proposed for deletion) was intended to meet my concern that there should be some discussion before launching the RAP, it rather misses my point: my concern was all about a possible risk of breakdown of communications between the PTI and CSC (which might justifiably be the reason for recourse to the RAP!) where CSC pushes to start a RAP, without seeking to understand whether there were mitigating circumstances or simple fixes that meant further action was not necessary. This is probably covered in I. a), although this in itself appears to be focussed on identifying whether a complaint is systemic, not on a failure to meet the service levels. One final point: I get Allan’s point that this is a document for PTI. But wouldn’t we want any future operator to be (at least initially) bound to this process? Best Martin From: CSC-Review [mailto:csc-review-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Elaine Pruis Sent: 28 February 2018 02:51 To: Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org> Cc: CSC-review@icann.org Subject: Re: [CSC-Review] Next call: Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC HI, Please find attached the most recent draft of the RAPs. Elaine On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org> wrote: Dear CSC Charter Review Team, The next call is scheduled for Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC. A calendar invite was sent earlier today. Please find the latest draft attached. All the best, Ria _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Ria Otanes | Secretariat Operations Coordinator Email maria.otanes@icann.org | Cell +1 202 679 5185 Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Washington, DC Office | EDT / UTC-5 _______________________________________________ CSC-Review mailing list CSC-Review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/csc-review
Apologies, I can’t make the meeting this morning. Elaine On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 9:47 AM Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org> wrote:
Dear CSC Charter Review Team,
The next call is scheduled for Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC. A calendar invite was sent earlier today.
Please find the latest draft attached.
All the best,
Ria
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
*Ria Otanes* | *Secretariat Operations Coordinator*
Email maria.otanes@icann.org | Cell +1 202 679 5185
I*nternet* C*orporation for *A*ssigned* N*ames** and *N*umbers*
*Washington, DC Office* | EDT / UTC-5
[image: /Users/maria.otanes/Library/Containers/com.microsoft.Outlook/Data/Library/Caches/Signatures/signature_1187332237]
_______________________________________________ CSC-Review mailing list CSC-Review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/csc-review
Hi All, On today’s call I agreed to annotate the draft and share with colleagues. In the attached I try where I can to suggest revised wording, but I am afraid that there are a few comments and open questions… I have not moved into the revised charter text! Hope this helps. Best Martin From: CSC-Review [mailto:csc-review-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Maria Otanes Sent: 27 February 2018 17:46 To: CSC-review@icann.org Subject: [CSC-Review] Next call: Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC Dear CSC Charter Review Team, The next call is scheduled for Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC. A calendar invite was sent earlier today. Please find the latest draft attached. All the best, Ria _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Ria Otanes | Secretariat Operations Coordinator Email maria.otanes@icann.org <mailto:maria.otanes@icann.org> | Cell +1 202 679 5185 Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Washington, DC Office | EDT / UTC-5
All, Please find included redline and clean version of updates I have included, using Martin’s annotations. Major changes: Clarified the text around monthly meetings Clarified the text with respect to the review of change of service level targets. Note the charter and text talk about service level targets, - expectations and – requirements. Added language around the Remedial Action Procedure, following yesterdays discussions and current state of play Moved section of travel support to observations ( out of charter scope) folwing earlier discussion not to include a reference to funding in the charter Updated and cleaned up the amended charter itself Next steps: assuming the goal is still to publish the initial report before the SJ meeting, suggest Keith and Donna review today and Martin, Abdalla (and I) again on Monday. By Monday evening UTC I suggest you take a go/no go decision. As to seeking public comment Once document is up for public comment, I will use the different secretariats to inform the broader community about the publication and about the metign with the CSC, RySG and ccNSO, which they are welcome to attend if interested. I have reached out to Byron to check whether the RT could meet with CSC at the end of the public meeting If document goes out on Tuesday for public comment, I’ll update the slides you used to discuss the initial findings with the CSC. Finally, suggest to include a compare current and new charter as Annex B and make ToR Annex C. Kind regards, Bart From: CSC-Review <csc-review-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Martin Boyle via CSC-Review <CSC-review@icann.org> Reply-To: Martin Boyle <martin.boyle.hertford@ntlworld.com> Date: Thursday 1 March 2018 at 23:37 To: Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org>, "CSC-review@icann.org" <CSC-review@icann.org> Subject: Re: [CSC-Review] Next call: Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC Hi All, On today’s call I agreed to annotate the draft and share with colleagues. In the attached I try where I can to suggest revised wording, but I am afraid that there are a few comments and open questions… I have not moved into the revised charter text! Hope this helps. Best Martin From: CSC-Review [mailto:csc-review-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Maria Otanes Sent: 27 February 2018 17:46 To: CSC-review@icann.org Subject: [CSC-Review] Next call: Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC Dear CSC Charter Review Team, The next call is scheduled for Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC. A calendar invite was sent earlier today. Please find the latest draft attached. All the best, Ria _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Ria Otanes | Secretariat Operations Coordinator Email maria.otanes@icann.org | Cell +1 202 679 5185 Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Washington, DC Office | EDT / UTC-5
Just as an FYI for everyone, I am making my way through the document and will get it back to this list tomorrow. From: CSC-Review [mailto:csc-review-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Bart Boswinkel Sent: Friday, March 02, 2018 8:49 AM To: CSC-review@icann.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [CSC-Review] Next call: Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC All, Please find included redline and clean version of updates I have included, using Martin’s annotations. Major changes: - Clarified the text around monthly meetings - Clarified the text with respect to the review of change of service level targets. Note the charter and text talk about service level targets, - expectations and – requirements. - Added language around the Remedial Action Procedure, following yesterdays discussions and current state of play - Moved section of travel support to observations ( out of charter scope) folwing earlier discussion not to include a reference to funding in the charter - Updated and cleaned up the amended charter itself Next steps: assuming the goal is still to publish the initial report before the SJ meeting, suggest Keith and Donna review today and Martin, Abdalla (and I) again on Monday. By Monday evening UTC I suggest you take a go/no go decision. As to seeking public comment - Once document is up for public comment, I will use the different secretariats to inform the broader community about the publication and about the metign with the CSC, RySG and ccNSO, which they are welcome to attend if interested. - I have reached out to Byron to check whether the RT could meet with CSC at the end of the public meeting - If document goes out on Tuesday for public comment, I’ll update the slides you used to discuss the initial findings with the CSC. - Finally, suggest to include a compare current and new charter as Annex B and make ToR Annex C. Kind regards, Bart From: CSC-Review <csc-review-bounces@icann.org<mailto:csc-review-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Martin Boyle via CSC-Review <CSC-review@icann.org<mailto:CSC-review@icann.org>> Reply-To: Martin Boyle <martin.boyle.hertford@ntlworld.com<mailto:martin.boyle.hertford@ntlworld.com>> Date: Thursday 1 March 2018 at 23:37 To: Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org<mailto:maria.otanes@icann.org>>, "CSC-review@icann.org<mailto:CSC-review@icann.org>" <CSC-review@icann.org<mailto:CSC-review@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [CSC-Review] Next call: Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC Hi All, On today’s call I agreed to annotate the draft and share with colleagues. In the attached I try where I can to suggest revised wording, but I am afraid that there are a few comments and open questions… I have not moved into the revised charter text! Hope this helps. Best Martin From: CSC-Review [mailto:csc-review-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Maria Otanes Sent: 27 February 2018 17:46 To: CSC-review@icann.org<mailto:CSC-review@icann.org> Subject: [CSC-Review] Next call: Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC Dear CSC Charter Review Team, The next call is scheduled for Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC. A calendar invite was sent earlier today. Please find the latest draft attached. All the best, Ria _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Ria Otanes | Secretariat Operations Coordinator Email maria.otanes@icann.org<mailto:maria.otanes@icann.org> | Cell +1 202 679 5185 Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Washington, DC Office | EDT / UTC-5 [/Users/maria.otanes/Library/Containers/com.microsoft.Outlook/Data/Library/Caches/Signatures/signature_1187332237]
Latest update: There are gaps/inconsistencies between the report and the proposed changes to the charter and the redline of the charter. It will take me some time to sort through this. To that end, I’m not confident we will be in a position to post this for public comment by Tuesday. I will do a bit more work on this today, but I will not be able to pick it up again until Tuesday. It’s important that we get this right, so I hope folks will bear with me while I work to clean this up. Thanks Donna From: CSC-Review [mailto:csc-review-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Austin, Donna via CSC-Review Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2018 3:29 PM To: Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org>; CSC-review@icann.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [CSC-Review] Next call: Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC Just as an FYI for everyone, I am making my way through the document and will get it back to this list tomorrow. From: CSC-Review [mailto:csc-review-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Bart Boswinkel Sent: Friday, March 02, 2018 8:49 AM To: CSC-review@icann.org<mailto:CSC-review@icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [CSC-Review] Next call: Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC All, Please find included redline and clean version of updates I have included, using Martin’s annotations. Major changes: - Clarified the text around monthly meetings - Clarified the text with respect to the review of change of service level targets. Note the charter and text talk about service level targets, - expectations and – requirements. - Added language around the Remedial Action Procedure, following yesterdays discussions and current state of play - Moved section of travel support to observations ( out of charter scope) folwing earlier discussion not to include a reference to funding in the charter - Updated and cleaned up the amended charter itself Next steps: assuming the goal is still to publish the initial report before the SJ meeting, suggest Keith and Donna review today and Martin, Abdalla (and I) again on Monday. By Monday evening UTC I suggest you take a go/no go decision. As to seeking public comment - Once document is up for public comment, I will use the different secretariats to inform the broader community about the publication and about the metign with the CSC, RySG and ccNSO, which they are welcome to attend if interested. - I have reached out to Byron to check whether the RT could meet with CSC at the end of the public meeting - If document goes out on Tuesday for public comment, I’ll update the slides you used to discuss the initial findings with the CSC. - Finally, suggest to include a compare current and new charter as Annex B and make ToR Annex C. Kind regards, Bart From: CSC-Review <csc-review-bounces@icann.org<mailto:csc-review-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Martin Boyle via CSC-Review <CSC-review@icann.org<mailto:CSC-review@icann.org>> Reply-To: Martin Boyle <martin.boyle.hertford@ntlworld.com<mailto:martin.boyle.hertford@ntlworld.com>> Date: Thursday 1 March 2018 at 23:37 To: Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org<mailto:maria.otanes@icann.org>>, "CSC-review@icann.org<mailto:CSC-review@icann.org>" <CSC-review@icann.org<mailto:CSC-review@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [CSC-Review] Next call: Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC Hi All, On today’s call I agreed to annotate the draft and share with colleagues. In the attached I try where I can to suggest revised wording, but I am afraid that there are a few comments and open questions… I have not moved into the revised charter text! Hope this helps. Best Martin From: CSC-Review [mailto:csc-review-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Maria Otanes Sent: 27 February 2018 17:46 To: CSC-review@icann.org<mailto:CSC-review@icann.org> Subject: [CSC-Review] Next call: Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC Dear CSC Charter Review Team, The next call is scheduled for Thursday, 01 March @ 16:00 UTC. A calendar invite was sent earlier today. Please find the latest draft attached. All the best, Ria _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Ria Otanes | Secretariat Operations Coordinator Email maria.otanes@icann.org<mailto:maria.otanes@icann.org> | Cell +1 202 679 5185 Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Washington, DC Office | EDT / UTC-5 [/Users/maria.otanes/Library/Containers/com.microsoft.Outlook/Data/Library/Caches/Signatures/signature_1187332237]
participants (5)
-
Austin, Donna -
Bart Boswinkel -
Elaine Pruis -
Maria Otanes -
Martin Boyle