Dear All, Attached please find the draft with my comments. I strongly support Timo´s idea of including different paths to follow such as creating a new working group that continues to discuss the these issues and learns from the experience of this group. Thanks Joke for helping us all putting this together. Best, Rosalía
On Sep 8, 2016, at 8:09 AM, Joke Braeken <joke.braeken@icann.org> wrote:
All,
Many thanks for your contributions to the progress report. May I kindly invite you to submit any additional comments there might be, no later than tomorrow (Friday 9 September), end of day? On Monday 12 September a consolidated version of the progress report will be circulated to the WG mailing list. The next WG call is scheduled for Monday 19 September at 21 UTC. A calendar invite has been sent out in the meanwhile.
Best regards,
Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken@icann.org <mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org>
Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ccNSO <https://twitter.com/ccNSO> Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/ <https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/> http://ccnso.icann.org <http://ccnso.icann.org/>
From: <ctn-crosscom-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Annebeth Lange <annebeth.lange@uninett.no> Date: Friday 2 September 2016 at 12:41 To: Timo Võhmar <timo.vohmar@internet.ee>, Heather Forrest <Heather.Forrest@acu.edu.au> Cc: "ctn-crosscom@icann.org" <ctn-crosscom@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Ctn-crosscom] invitation to submit comments or questions related to the post-Helsinki progress report
Dear all,
I have gone through the progress report after Heather’s answers to my questions. To make it easier to read I have accepted some of the more “linguistic” comments. Please see some new remarks from me.
Kind regards Annebeth
From: <ctn-crosscom-bounces@icann.org <mailto:ctn-crosscom-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Timo Võhmar <timo.vohmar@internet.ee <mailto:timo.vohmar@internet.ee>> Date: Thursday 1 September 2016 22:25 To: Heather Forrest <Heather.Forrest@acu.edu.au <mailto:Heather.Forrest@acu.edu.au>> Cc: "ctn-crosscom@icann.org <mailto:ctn-crosscom@icann.org>" <ctn-crosscom@icann.org <mailto:ctn-crosscom@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [Ctn-crosscom] invitation to submit comments or questions related to the post-Helsinki progress report
Hi Heather
Just to clarify, my proposal was not to remove reference to PDP but to rephrase that part of the conclusion with two options - new CWG and PDP. Added my suggestion in the doc.
Best Regards, Timo Võhmar
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Heather Forrest <Heather.Forrest@acu.edu.au <mailto:Heather.Forrest@acu.edu.au>> wrote: Dear all,
I have followed up in answering Annebeth's questions in the comments and have no fundamental objections. On one point I believe we have duplicate text in two places so we need to decide where to put it. I've noted that in a reply comment. New version attached.
I do not agree with Timo's proposal at the end of the document to remove the reference in the recommendations section to the charter of the Subsequent Procedures PDP. This should not be a controversial statement, as the Charter is available and a public document.
Kind regards,
Heather Forrest
_______________________________________________ Ctn-crosscom mailing list Ctn-crosscom@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ctn-crosscom
