October 2014 - CWG-Stewardship

Scheduling: regular teleconference meetings + F2F in November
by Grace Abuhamad Oct. 23, 2014

Oct. 23, 2014

Hi all, A few scheduling updates: Regular Meetings: We have a very large and geographically diverse CWG. Going forward, we'll have regular weekly 2h calls on Thursdays. To cover all the timezones, I'd like to suggest alternating 10:00 UTC and 13:00 UTC. This is early for our participants in the Americas, but more reasonable for the majority of our group based in Europe, Africa, and Asia. As always, calls will be recorded and transcribed. Face-to-face Meeting: In addition, at the request of the Chairs, ICANN has offered to support a 2-day face-to-face meeting in Amsterdam on 19-20 November 2014. ICANN will offer travel support to the 19 CWG members only <https://community.icann.org/x/1QrxAg> , but the meeting will be open to anyone in the CWG who wishes to attend in person (at their own expense). The meeting will be webcast live through Adobe Connect and include remote participation capabilities consistent with the CWG meetings to date. The meeting will be recorded and transcribed. In order for ICANN to plan for adequate space, please let me know by next Monday (27 October 2014) whether or not you plan to attend the CWG F2F meeting in Amsterdam. For members seeking travel support, please note that, the meeting will be consistent with ICANN¹s Community Travel Support Guidelines <http://www.icann.org/en/news/in-focus/travel-support> : travel needs to be arranged by ICANN; ICANN will only book and pay for a non-refundable, lowest logical price airfare, and economy airfare; hotel room and tax must be booked directly by ICANN in accordance with the authorized arrival and departure dates for each supported traveler. Please let me know if you have any questions, Grace Grace Abuhamad Public Policy Manager ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers 801 17th Street NW, Suite 400 | Washington, DC 20006 Direct: +1 202 249 7545 | Mobile: +1 310 200 7638

16 30

Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Notes and action items from today's meeting
by Grace Abuhamad Oct. 23, 2014

Oct. 23, 2014

Meeting notes, transcripts, recordings, etc, have been added: https://community.icann.org/x/HSnxAg :) From: Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org> Date: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 10:30 AM To: "cwg-stewardship(a)icann.org" <cwg-stewardship(a)icann.org> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Notes and action items from today's meeting Dear All, Following today¹s meeting, please find attached the notes & action items as well as the materials presented during this meeting. These materials will be uploaded shortly on the wiki (https://community.icann.org/x/HSnxAg) For action items 2 and 3, please feel free to send me a message off-list indicating which sub-group you would like to volunteer for if your name has not been captured yet in the attached notes. As suggested, we¹ll create separate wiki pages for each of the sub-groups where we will list the membership and any other relevant information. For your convenience, I¹ll restate the action items here: Guiding principles for CWG Action item 1: Send draft principles document out to the list to solicit written comments (see draft principles attached). Lise, Martin Boyle to work with Bernie to update document based on input received, suggestions made and determine whether updated version needs to be discussed further during next meeting or not. Structure of Work (see presentation attached) Action item 2: WG members and participants to identify for which sub-groups they would like to volunteer (note, if you volunteer, please make sure that you are able to actively contribute - all members will be able to provide input / feedback throughout the process, but sub-group members are expected to hold the pen and move the discussion forward). Triage of ICANN Functions Contract (see sample attached) Action item 3: Volunteers to work with Allan on the triage effort to express their interest on the mailing list. Action item 4: Staff to include a separate work item for this effort and update slides accordingly F2F meeting Action item 5: Staff to send further details about F2F meeting as soon as possible, including confirmation of whether SO/ACs can appoint an alternate (from current CWG participants) to be supported to attend the F2F meeting if a member is not able to attend. The next meeting will be scheduled for Thursday 30 October at 10.00 UTC (call details will be sent separately). Best regards, Marika T

3 5

Apologies
by Robert Guerra Oct. 22, 2014

Oct. 22, 2014

Apologies for my being able to make the call today. Unfortunately was giving a workshop at an event the last two days Will review notes and minutes from discussions that have taken place since the LA meeting and respond shortly Regards Robert Sent from my iPhone

1 0

Co-Chair Update
by Jonathan Robinson Oct. 21, 2014

Oct. 21, 2014

Dear CWG Members & Participants, A brief update from myself as co-chair of the CWG alongside my recently appointed ccNSO colleague and co-chair Lise Fuhr. First, a warm personal welcome to Lise whom I only met in LA for the first time. I am very much looking forward to working with her and all of you on this critical project. By now, you have already heard from Lise so you will be aware that she is up and running as co-chair. This was assisted by the fact that we had a handover meeting between interim co-chair Byron Holland, myself and the CWG support staff (from ICANN) back in LA. As it transpires, my current work commitments are extraordinary and consequentially, I am unable to give the CWG my proper attention for the next 2 to 3 weeks. Lise is aware of this as is Byron who will be in a position to offer support from his current position as a participant. I have also made my position clear to my GNSO colleagues who are members of the CWG and so they are also on standby to assist as necessary. I trust that Lise will do a fine job but am aware that my sudden unavailability has thrown her into the deep end with the work of this CWG. Please join me in offering her all the focus and discipline we can in order to move this critical task forward and within the very tight timescales we are dealing with. Many thanks, Jonathan (in my capacity as CWG Co-chair)

1 0

Proposed Agenda for 3rd Meeting (Wednesday 22 October 13:00 - 15:00 UTC)
by Grace Abuhamad Oct. 21, 2014

Oct. 21, 2014

Hi all, The proposed agenda for the meeting is as follows: 1. Welcome & Roll Call 2. Notes from last meeting & Review of action items 3. Proposal on how to structure the work 4.. Status on work on items 1 and 2 in RFP and volunteers 5. Example of triage of IANA Functions Contract 6. Any other business 7. Summary of action items and agreed items

2 1

Fwd: Proposed Agenda for 3rd Meeting (Wednesday 22 October 13:00 - 15:00 UTC)
by Eduardo Diaz Oct. 21, 2014

Oct. 21, 2014

I forgot to add this comment to the list. So here it is. -ed ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Eduardo Diaz <eduardodiazrivera(a)gmail.com> Date: Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 11:17 AM Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Proposed Agenda for 3rd Meeting (Wednesday 22 October 13:00 - 15:00 UTC) To: Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad(a)icann.org> Grace: I suggest that we include an item related to the proposed f2f in Amsterdam under any other business or as an actual agenda item. I read various mail with proposals for doing a Doodle to select the dates and issues with visas. I thinks we should give this a few minutes possible towards the end of the meeting. -ed On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad(a)icann.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > The proposed agenda for the meeting is as follows: > > 1. Welcome & Roll Call > > 2. Notes from last meeting & Review of action items > > 3. Proposal on how to structure the work > > 4.. Status on work on items 1 and 2 in RFP and volunteers > > 5. Example of triage of IANA Functions Contract > > 6. Any other business > > 7. Summary of action items and agreed items > > > > > _______________________________________________ > CWG-Stewardship mailing list > CWG-Stewardship(a)icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship > > -- *NOTICE:* This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. -- *NOTICE:* This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately.

1 0

Appointment Lise Fuhr (.dk) as ccNSO co-chair CWG
by Bart Boswinkel Oct. 21, 2014

Oct. 21, 2014

Dear all, The ccNSO Council appointed Lise Fuhr (.dk) as ccNSO co-chair of the CWG at its meeting on 15 October 2015. According to the charter of the CWG to develop IANA Stewardship Transition Proposal for the naming related function and at the suggestion of the CWG, the ccNSO appoints one of the two co-chairs of the CWG from among the ccNSO appointed members. On behalf of the chair of ccNSO Bart Boswinkel ( senior policy advisor ccNSO)

1 0

Re: [CWG-Stewardship] RySG Rep to the CWG
by avri doria Oct. 20, 2014

Oct. 20, 2014

Hi, These are RySG appointments. Why would staff announce them? avri Sent from a T-Mobile 4G LTE Device <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji(a)gmail.com> </div><div>Date:10/20/2014 7:58 AM (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes(a)verisign.com> </div><div>Cc: cwg-stewardship(a)icann.org </div><div>Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] RySG Rep to the CWG </div><div> </div>Hi Gomes, Just to be clear, you are announcing this as....? I mean under what hat are you announcing because i was thinking staff does the members announcement....has that changed? Cheers! On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes(a)verisign.com> wrote: I am pleased to report that Donna Austin will be the official member from the RySG on the IANA Stewardship Transition CWG. Donna is from the Asia Pacific region. Also, Stephanie Duchesneau will serve as an alternate for Donna if needed. Stephanie is from North America. Both of them have been participants in the CWG so they are not new to the list. Chuck “This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, notify sender immediately and delete this message immediately.” _______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Seun Ojedeji, Federal University Oye-Ekiti web: http://www.fuoye.edu.ng Mobile: +2348035233535 alt email: seun.ojedeji(a)fuoye.edu.ng The key to understanding is humility - my view !

4 3

Options/Scenarios for Transition
by Guru Acharya Oct. 20, 2014

Oct. 20, 2014

Chuck, in another thread, had rightly mentioned that we should consider all options/scenarios before we decide the best option for the transition. I have taken the prerogative of creating a new Google Document where all the options can be listed and discussed. I request CWG members to add other options to this document so that we can have an informed discussion. The document can be edited here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B46mlsyZUFF4bZfeWgGCdqIQHCP2BMOy4KZU4Ri…

2 1

Differences in oversight requirements for ccTLD and gTLD communities
by Guru Acharya Oct. 20, 2014

Oct. 20, 2014

I request the experienced members to explain how the oversight requirements for the ccTLD and gTLD communities may differ. >From the IANA Functions Contract, I could only find different treatments for the two communities in clauses C.2.9.2.c and C.2.9.2d. These clauses are on the policy framework for delegation and redelegation of ccTLDs and gTLDs respectively. Besides this difference mentioned in the codified clauses of the IANA Functions Contract, are they any other uncodified reasons for different oversight requirements? Specifically, what differences between the ccTLD and gTLD communities can lead to what sort of different possibilities in terms of institutional structures for oversight? Ref: IANA Functions Contract: https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/contract-01oct12-en.pdf

2 1