December 2015 - CWG-Stewardship

Notes, Recordings, Transcript CWG IANA Meeting #73 -- 15 December
by Brenda Brewer Dec. 15, 2015

Dec. 15, 2015

Dear all, The notes, recordings and transcripts for the CWG IANA Meeting #73 on 15 December 2015 will be available here: https://community.icann.org/x/1oJlAw\ <https://community.icann.org/x/1oJlAw/> A copy of the notes and action items may be found below. Kind regards, Brenda Action Items * Action item: Sharon to draft language in relation to section 7 and will send to Grace. * Action item: Staff to produce revised draft based on comments and input received within 24 hours (Wednesday 16.00 UTC). * Action item: CWG-Stewardship to review updated draft within 24 hours (Thursday 16.00 UTC) - Chuck to suggest language concerning timing issues and conditionality of a working escalation mechanism. * Action item: Sidley to review final draft and produces final version by Friday 18 December * Action item: All to review document and contribute to the list with any comments / feedback you have. To be further discussed at the next meeting in January. * Action item: written update to be provided on those items not covered on the call. Notes Eduardo Diaz, Holly Gregory, and David Conrad on audio only 1. Opening remarks * Status of CWG-Stewardship letter concerning implementation: ALAC confirmed during last meeting that there were no objections to the proposed approach, ccNSO Council discussed the letter last week and concluded that it was a natural and sensible approach and will confirm support in writing, GNSO Chair confirmed that no objections have been received to the letter, SSAC - still reviewing but no objections so far, GAC - still deliberating, call coming Friday to discuss further. * Client committee met with Sidley last week to discuss letter to CCWG-Accountability concerning requirements, instruction to simplify the Bylaws (see also item 4), implementation of PTI (see also item 3). * Two calls with CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs since last meeting. Thomas, CCWG-Accountability Co-Chair has joined this meeting to answer any questions there may be. * Co-chairs call with other operational communities later today to discus IPR issue. 2. CCWG Dependencies * See Sidley Draft circulated to CWG-Stewardship Mailing List * Proposed contribution to CCWG-Accountability as well as the chartering organizations to help inform their deliberations on the proposal * Input received from various members of the CWG-Stewardship * Responding to proposal that is static but open to public comment which makes it slightly challenging. Comments may or may not impact final output of the CCWG-Accountability. CWG-Stewardship input has to be based on proposal as it stands as it is not possible to anticipate possible changes at this stage, but acknowledge at the same time that there may be further changes that may impact the identified dependencies. * Section 1 - Community Empowerment Mechanism: Why should there be a limitation on the use of an escalation process to remove a director to once during a director's three year term? Not necessarily a show-stopper, but not clear why it needs to be there. The use of the escalation process could be very limited by the time constraints proposed, especially in a MSM environment. Proposed limitation is fine balance found between the different positions in the CCWG-Accountability - so probably something the CWG-Stewardship may need to live with. Does anything in the Board comments change the nature of the response? At first sight no fundamental issues or show-stoppers identified from a dependency perspective. * Section 2 - ICANN Budget and IANA Budget: Note for CWG: Confirm that the limitation of the ability of the community to challenge a budget as described in the draft proposal. Transparency key aspect for cc-community. In the event of separation, it would be helpful to know how much a contract is costing. Sufficient funding to ensure staffing of IANA, even in case of dispute with ICANN. Does the caretaker budget apply to IANA budget as well as overall ICANN budget? Can be related, but there should be separate processes for the two. Is it possible to challenge / reject the IANA budget, if the CWG-Stewardship process proposed is not followed? Nature of reforms are not being reflected - which part of the budget is being rejected, names or all, names shouldn't be able to decide on the budget assigned to other communities. Budget would cover all communities so a rejection would affect all. Issue could be further dealt with in implementation? See also suggestions made by Chuck / Greg to request certain changes from CCWG-Accountability. Careful with use of IANA and PTI where appropriate in the document - to avoid ambiguity letter should specify PTI or naming functions when applicable. Some functions will be provided to PTI by ICANN. When referring to budget always use "PTI" rather than IANA; when referring to reviews of IANA functions, always refer to naming-related IANA functions. * Section 3 - firm up the recommendation that right to reject can be exercised an unlimited number of times. * Section 6 Separaton Process: if Board must approve creation of review CCWG, would it be possible for the Board to block the initiaton of a review? Inaction should also be seen as a decision and as such falling under the enforcement mechanisms. * Section 7 Appeals Mechanism - is it possible to be more explicit with regards to what is required by CWG-Stewardship? Could add to Bylaws that ICANN needs to enforce contract with PTI - failure to enforce would also be subject to enforcement and escalation or to make the sole designator a third party beneficiary to the contract with PTI. Consider adding these as possible examples for dealing with this issue. Action item: Sharon to draft language in relation to section 7 and will send to Grace. * Changes to be made: change "recommend" to "require", change terminology as discussed. * Intention is to submit the letter in time for the closing of the public comment period. Objective is to be as specific as possible with regards to any possible changes that are being requested / suggested to the CCWG-Accountability. * Need to be careful not to open up other elements of CWG-Stewardship work. Action item: Staff to produce revised draft based on comments and input received within 24 hours (Wednesday 16.00 UTC). Action item: CWG-Stewardship to review updated draft within 24 hours (Thursday 16.00 UTC) - Chuck to suggest language concerning timing issues and conditionality of a working escalation mechanism. Action item: Sidley to review final draft and produces final version by Friday 18 December 3. Implementation * Staff Update - see slides shared during the meeting. Project plans are in draft form - staff aiming to clarify with NTIA what can be done prior to final approval. Comments: limited time available to develop budget process in the proposed plan. May be worth starting that earlier. What is the reason for the delay on the info concerning SLEs? Current info is not exactly suitable for new SLEs, staff is reviewing how to make these more suitable. Data comes from two different systems. Taking more time than initially anticipated, also as the result of external contractors being involved. * DT-IPR - see document circulated to CWG-Stewardship mailing list. Take specific note of the decision points as outlined in the document such as what type of neutrality does the naming community find acceptable - structural or functional neutrality? Which relationship form will the names community require? Funding questions. Action item: All to review document and contribute to the list with any comments / feedback you have. To be further discussed at the next meeting in January. . Creation of PTI - written update to be provided 4. Bylaws - further discussed with Sidley. Further updates to be provided. Responses to open questions to be developed by relevant DT leads for CWG-Stewardship review (DT-M (Escalation -- Chuck) , DT-CSC (Donna) , and DT-N (Reviews -- Avri). 5. AOB 6. Closing Remarks * Next call scheduled for 12 January at 16.00 UTC. Action item: written update to be provided on those items not covered on the call. Documents * <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/56984278/CWG%20Comment%20L… ficationDate=1450196644421&api=v2> CWG Comment Letter.pdf * <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/56984278/Transition%20Impl… l%20Plans_CWG_15Dec2016.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1450196218148&api=v2> Transition Implementation High Level Plans_CWG_15Dec2016.pdf * <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/56984278/DT-IPR%20Draft%20… 5.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1450201881102&api=v2> DT-IPR Draft of December 14 2015.pdf

1 0

Agenda for CWG call #73 (15 December at 16:00 UTC)
by Grace Abuhamad Dec. 14, 2015

Dec. 14, 2015

Dear all, Here below is the proposed agenda for the CWG Meeting #73 (15 December at 16:00 UTC). I have attached Sidley¹s original letter on CCWG dependencies and Greg¹s DT-IPR document. The Chairs' email on key issues and commitments is copied below. 1. Opening Remarks 2. CCWG Dependencies * Presentation from Sidley * Questions and Remarks from the CWG 3. Implementation * Staff Update * DT-IPR * Creation of PTI 4. Bylaws 5. AOB 6. Closing Remarks Thank you, Grace From: <cwg-stewardship-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson(a)afilias.info> Organization: Afilias Reply-To: Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson(a)afilias.info> Date: Monday, December 14, 2015 at 11:12 AM To: "cwg-stewardship(a)icann.org" <cwg-stewardship(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] CWG Stewardship - Key Issues & Committments All, Apologies for the time error in my email from earlier today. The meeting tomorrow will take place as scheduled i.e. 16h00 UTC The proposed meeting for 12 January is for the same time i.e. 16h00 UTC Thank-you. Jonathan From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com] Sent: 14 December 2015 14:45 To: cwg-stewardship(a)icann.org Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] CWG Stewardship - Key Issues & Committments All, Ahead of tomorrow¹s meeting of our CWG, Lise and I reviewed the current position of our work and between us, we felt that it will be useful to highlight a few key points as follows: 1. We have a LAST CWG MEETING OF 2015 tomorrow (Tuesday 15 December) at 14h00 UTC and it will be good to have as much attendance and participation as possible. 2. Our next meeting and the FIRST CWG MEETING OF 2016 is provisionally scheduled for Tuesday 12 January 2016 (14h00 UTC). The most urgent item we need to deal with, is to review and finalise our response to the third draft of the CCWG ICANN Accountability proposal, specifically to be able to formally respond on whether or not the proposal meets the key conditions set by our CWG. We have a draft response prepared by Sidley and in circulation on the CWG mailing list. We have already received thoughtful comments on that draft and the primary purpose of tomorrow¹s call will be to get the response updated and agreed during the course of the meeting. We will then be in a positon to communicate the CWG response to the CCWG Chairs and also to the CCWG Chartering Organisations. As you likely recall, the planned communication includes submission of our response into the public comment process for this third draft of the CCWG¹s work. An additional urgent item, is to review the work of the DT-IPR group. DT-IPR submitted to the CWG today, a draft document which includes key questions for review and decision taking by the CWG. Through our recent collaboration with the other Operational Communities, we are aware of their desire to see progress from us on dealing with the IANA IPR. In this regard, it is very helpful to have the work product of DT-IPR posted to the CWG, but we are cognisant that you will have only seen it approximately 24 hours before tomorrow¹s meeting. If time permits, we would like the CWG to obtain a good understanding of the document and the key issues within it, as well as the specific questions being asked. Ideally, we will be able to deal with the questions and issues arising from DT-IPR utilising our mailing list email and then use the 12 January meeting to finalise our position at f possible. The third major issue is for the CWG is to provide relevant assistance to Sidley with respect to Sidley¹s work on developing the ICANN bylaws that specifically deal with the work outputs of this group. We plan to report on this during today¹s CWG meeting and, on the back of last week¹s CWG Client Committee meeting, propose a practical way forward. So . Please do note the calls tomorrow and 12 January at 14h00 UTC on both days and we¹ll look forward to working with you during and in-between these meetings. Thank-you Jonthan Robinson & Lise Fuhr Co-chairs, CWG Steardship

1 0

CWG Stewardship - Key Issues & Committments
by Jonathan Robinson Dec. 14, 2015

Dec. 14, 2015

All, Ahead of tomorrow's meeting of our CWG, Lise and I reviewed the current position of our work and between us, we felt that it will be useful to highlight a few key points as follows: 1. We have a LAST CWG MEETING OF 2015 tomorrow (Tuesday 15 December) at 14h00 UTC and it will be good to have as much attendance and participation as possible. 2. Our next meeting and the FIRST CWG MEETING OF 2016 is provisionally scheduled for Tuesday 12 January 2016 (14h00 UTC). The most urgent item we need to deal with, is to review and finalise our response to the third draft of the CCWG ICANN Accountability proposal, specifically to be able to formally respond on whether or not the proposal meets the key conditions set by our CWG. We have a draft response prepared by Sidley and in circulation on the CWG mailing list. We have already received thoughtful comments on that draft and the primary purpose of tomorrow's call will be to get the response updated and agreed during the course of the meeting. We will then be in a positon to communicate the CWG response to the CCWG Chairs and also to the CCWG Chartering Organisations. As you likely recall, the planned communication includes submission of our response into the public comment process for this third draft of the CCWG's work. An additional urgent item, is to review the work of the DT-IPR group. DT-IPR submitted to the CWG today, a draft document which includes key questions for review and decision taking by the CWG. Through our recent collaboration with the other Operational Communities, we are aware of their desire to see progress from us on dealing with the IANA IPR. In this regard, it is very helpful to have the work product of DT-IPR posted to the CWG, but we are cognisant that you will have only seen it approximately 24 hours before tomorrow's meeting. If time permits, we would like the CWG to obtain a good understanding of the document and the key issues within it, as well as the specific questions being asked. Ideally, we will be able to deal with the questions and issues arising from DT-IPR utilising our mailing list email and then use the 12 January meeting to finalise our position at f possible. The third major issue is for the CWG is to provide relevant assistance to Sidley with respect to Sidley's work on developing the ICANN bylaws that specifically deal with the work outputs of this group. We plan to report on this during today's CWG meeting and, on the back of last week's CWG Client Committee meeting, propose a practical way forward. So .. Please do note the calls tomorrow and 12 January at 14h00 UTC on both days and we'll look forward to working with you during and in-between these meetings. Thank-you Jonthan Robinson & Lise Fuhr Co-chairs, CWG Steardship

3 2

FW: ICANN Board Comments on Third CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations
by Jonathan Robinson Dec. 14, 2015

Dec. 14, 2015

All FYI From: Michelle Bright [mailto:michelle.bright@icann.org] Sent: 14 December 2015 06:17 Subject: ICANN Board Comments on Third CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations Attached, please find the ICANN Board Comments on Third CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations. Kind Regards, Michelle Bright Michelle Bright Board Operations Content Manager, ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Direct: +1-310-578-8678 Mobile: +1-310-570-8296 http://icann.org <http://icann.org/>

1 0

Notes, Recordings, Transcript DT-IPR Meeting on 10 December
by Brenda Brewer Dec. 10, 2015

Dec. 10, 2015

Dear all, The notes, recordings and transcripts for the DT-IPR Meeting #5 on 10 December 2015 will be available here: https://community.icann.org/x/RoJlAw The notes are copied here for your convenience. NOTES: The Google doc is available for you to review, comment, etc at: <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZGSlKj-JSXe4T0wWv-hN6srDVOwhRJvQZzRpkGA…> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZGSlKj-JSXe4T0wWv-hN6srDVOwhRJvQZzRpkGA… Notes and edits will be taken live in the Google document. A PDF of the Google doc is now in the Adobe room. It is unsynced so you can scroll through at your pace Andrew's suggested text: Any dispute resolution among any of the Owner and the operational communities will follow the same overall dispute resolution mechanism as any other IPR, with two over-riding caveats: the continued operational stability of any registry hosted at <http://iana.org/> iana.org is paramount.No IFO may continue to publish registries at <http://iana.org/> iana.org or anywhere beneath it when the authoritative source for the registry data has instructed that such registries be removed. Kind regards, Brenda

1 0

Notes, Recordings, Transcript CWG IANA Meeting #72 -- 3 December
by Brenda Brewer Dec. 3, 2015

Dec. 3, 2015

Dear all, The notes, recordings and transcripts for the CWG IANA Meeting #72 on 3 December 2015 will be available here: https://community.icann.org/x/kbpYAw A copy of the notes and action items may be found below. Kind regards, Brenda Action Items Action: Trang to provide response to Greg on PTI legal status. Greg's assumption is that "ICANN Incorporates subsidiary" is not completely accurate since PTI is not designed legally as a subsidiary, but an affiliate. Possible change to the implementation plan to say "ICANN forms PTI affiliate" Action: Trang to review the timeline for PTI Part 1 slide (slide 9). Trang to include a line item for PTI Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws. Trang to provide answer about whether ICANN would be willing to take on drafting for CWG by early February. Action: Trang to communicate plan for IFR somewhere in the slide deck (so that it is not perceived as missed). Action: Client Committee to review plan for PTI implementation on next call. Unless serious objection from Sidley, the project will proceed as planned by ICANN. i.e. where ICANN will draft the Articles & Bylaws for review by the CWG with the assistance of Sidley. Action: IPR Document due to CWG on Friday 11 December. Action: Client Committee to instruct Sidley to produce a simplified version of the Bylaws. Action: Grace to share the framework with the CWG after the call. Include a covering note to indicate that this work is on hold pending the Client Committee assignment to Sidley. Action: Client Committee to instruct Sidley to assist with dependency tracking for the CCWG proposal. Notes Opening Remarks * Transition Program Facilitation Meeting (1 Dec). All meetings are archived here: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/transition-facilitation-2015-0923en. The main interest was the CCWG's document coming out for public comment and whether its Chartering Organizations could approve. A question was also raised regarding the names SLEs. * Operational communities met to discuss IANA IPR. There is some pressure on CWG to produce output as soon as possible, while noting that the CWG needs to complete its work in order for a joint solution to be discussed. * On letter to Chartering Organizations from CWG, no response was expected. ALAC reviewed the letter and agreed to an extension of the Charter for implementation. ccNSO needs to further discuss. GNSO has not formally settled on this issue yet. The GAC will provide more clarity shortly (current have some questions on CWG role towards ICG when it comes to implementation). * Next call will be on Tuesday 15 December at 16:00 UTC. Implementation Update from ICANN Staff (link to slides: <https://community.icann.org/x/msBYAw> https://community.icann.org/x/msBYAw) * Helpful feedback received last week from CWG. Any additional feedback is welcome. * ICANN Bylaws are targeted for drafting completion 4 weeks after proposal submission to NTIA. Project is on track. * Names SLEs: information (if usable) could be presented as soon as February. Project is on track. * IANA IPR project is not started. * RZMS Standing Committee project is not started. * IANA Operation Escalation Mechanisms project is not started. * The PTI project depends on how much NTIA can authorize prior to approval of the proposals. Timelines may shift * PTI Budget planning for FY17 is on track * ICANN has been working closely with RIRs to finalize their SLAs. For the IAB/IETF MoU, the parties are doing a final set of updates since the document was originally drafted in March. * IFR will be incorporated into the ICANN Bylaws. Its operationalization would be slated for post-transition since the first review is not expected to take place until 2 years after the transition. * On the CSC timing, this is staggered to ensure that not al of the projects are running at once. Action: Trang to provide response to Greg on PTI legal status. Greg's assumption is that "ICANN Incorporates subsidiary" is not completely accurate since PTI is not designed legally as a subsidiary, but an affiliate. Possible change to the implementation plan to say "ICANN forms PTI affiliate" Action: Trang to review the timeline for PTI Part 1 slide (slide 9). Trang to include a line item for PTI Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws. Trang to provide answer about whether ICANN would be willing to take on drafting for CWG by early February. Action: Trang to communicate plan for IFR somewhere in the slide deck (so that it is not perceived as missed). Action: Client Committee to review plan for PTI implementation on next call. Unless serious objection from Sidley, the project will proceed as planned by ICANN. i.e. where ICANN will draft the Articles & Bylaws for review by the CWG with the assistance of Sidley. DT-IPR (IANA IPR) * Google doc is available at: <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZGSlKj-JSXe4T0wWv-hN6srDVOwhRJvQZzRpkGA…> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZGSlKj-JSXe4T0wWv-hN6srDVOwhRJvQZzRpkGA…. * The scope of this group is to deal with the principles and requirements of the future state of IANA IPR Action: IPR Document due to CWG on Friday 11 December. DT-O (PTI Budget) * In last CWG call, Xavier gave a presentation on the approach being proposed by ICANN on developing a budget for IANA/PTI. * A key target date is 15 January. for this date, staff would like to have all the details to work on the budget. 5 March will be the start of the public comment on the IANA/PTI budget. * DT-O members all support the approach suggested by ICANN. * Three questions to the CWG: 1) Do you see any problems with this approach? 2) Are there any operational areas for which you think more than minimal changes might be in order? 3) Do you have any suggestions for improvement? DT-A (SLEs) No update Bylaws * Sidley supplied a draft set of Bylaws on 7 November * We went through the slides at the last CWG meeting. The group agreed to have Sidley work on a simplified version of the Bylaws. At the same time, the group was going to go through the questions from Sidley and provide responses. * Staff prepared a framework for the work on responses to Sidley, but the questions might not all be needed at this time, if Sidley were to redraft the Bylaws. Action: Client Committee to instruct Sidley to produce a simplified version of the Bylaws. Action: Grace to share the framework with the CWG after the call. Include a covering note to indicate that this work is on hold pending the Client Committee assignment to Sidley. CCWG & ICG * Chairs' coordination call has been postponed until tomorrow. * Sidley will help track dependencies. Action: Client Committee to instruct Sidley to assist with dependency tracking for the CCWG proposal. AOB None Closing Remarks See you next on Tuesday 15 December at 16:00 UTC

3 2

Re: [CWG-Stewardship] CWG IANA Meeting #73 | 14:00 UTC | Thursday, 17 December
by Keith Davidson Dec. 3, 2015

Dec. 3, 2015

Hi Brenda, all, What has happened to the rotation of meeting times? Yesterdays meeting was at 14:00UTC (which is 3:00am for me) and the next meeting on 17 December is scheduled for this same time... Keith Davidson On 1/12/2015 5:32 a.m., Brenda Brewer wrote: > Event Invitation > > CWG IANA Meeting #73 | 14:00 UTC | Thursday, 17 December --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

1 0

IANA IPR - Co-ordination amongst the Operational Communities
by Jonathan Robinson Dec. 2, 2015

Dec. 2, 2015

All, Below are a set of notes that seek to capture the key points from the most recent call (25 Nov) on the IANA IPR that we had among the three operational communities i.e. Numbers, Protocols & CWG Chairs (see below for names of participants). Any questions/comments on discussions at the last call or how we are proceeding are welcome. At this stage, we are still discussing timelines and the framework of how we work together, in order to be able to coordinate and reach an overall agreement on the IPR principles and framework. Note: Numbers are suggesting we try to agree on the principles and framework before the submission of the ICG proposal to the NTIA, and complete implementation of the IPR before the transition. Once in the implementation phase, it is likely that the group who have been meeting will participate as observers to ensure that the implementation plan is consistent with the proposal. Currently, it is primarily about planning & co-ordination and the conversation is very respectful of the different operating communities positions and requirements but there is some sense of time pressure from the other two OCs. Thanks, Jonathan (who has not had the opportunity to run my covering note above by Lise) ---- IPR call among the three Operational Communities Wed 25th Nov UTC12:00-12:55 [Participants] Names : Jonathan Robinson, Lise Fuhr Numbers : Alan Barrett, Nurani Nimpuno, Paul Wilson, Izumi Okutani Protocols: Andrew Sullivan, Jari Arkko [Key Points] 1. Steps towards implementation: Suggested by Jari Arkko and supported by the participants * Work in two stages In first stage : to be driven between the 3 OCs to find an acceptable framework In second stage: the IPR matter is take to the OC and ICANN lawyers for an implementation that framework. * The implementation effort is not a place to rethink or renegotiate results of community or ICG proposals 2. Update from the CWG: DT-IPR Intellectual Property Rights https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocwgdtstwrdshp/DT-IPR++Intellectual+P roperty+Rights * A team dedicated to discuss IPR implementation has been set up (lead by Greg Shatan) - The team does not make final decisions It is to make progress in considerations, to then be discussed and finalised in the CWG - There is strong recognition of a need to work in timely manner - Having additional members including IP and Trust expert(s) may be helpful but work is well underway * Draft on IPR considerations by the CWG IPR team is under development https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZGSlKj-JSXe4T0wWv-hN6srDVOwhRJvQZzRpkGAA Pk8/edit?usp=sharing * An additional issue which has not been raised: financing of the holder of the IPR - The entity holding the IPR will need some funds / funding in order to be able to properly hold and maintain the IPR - The IETF Trust will be able to accommodate financing, if the IETF Trust becomes the holder (Clarified by Jari) 3. Way Forward: * Key events to keep in mind towards implementation: - Submission of the proposal to the NTIA (although resolution of the IPR location is not a pre-requisite to submission) and - Expiry the IANA contract * Components to agree for 3 OCs to work together: - Timelines - Communication (information sharing of status) - Coordination (in discussing issues) * Need for stronger coordination among the three operational communities - An idea was shared to establish a way to coordinate among the three operational communities, in parallel to discussions in IPR Team in the CWG - An observation was made, that there is a room for leaders from the three communities to lead on setting the framework on how we work - More to be discussed at the future call * The three communities need to be in sync in the scope of work at each phase - Observations were made that there is no need for the IPR Team in the CWG to solve all details of implementation at this stage - The CWG DT to focus on high level principles and requirements. It is anticipated that this will help the three OCs to move forward constructively and converge. A CWG Co-Chair shared an observation this is a constructive way forward. 4. Suggestion: (Not discussed at the call) i. Arrange the next call in two weeks time - Will set up a doodle poll ii. By the next call, seek for feedback from each OCs: - Whether syncing key dates with work needed as below can be agreed [Milestones to target completion of work by three OCs] Stage one (agree on principles and framework): before the ICG & CCWG proposals submission to the NTIA (around Feb 2016) Stage two (complete implementation on IPR) : before the IANA contract expiry (Sep 2016) - CWG Chairs to share key points in the IPR discussions, on anything which needs coordination by the three OCs Invitation open to Greg Shatan as the Chair of DT-IPR iii. Move ahead with a Cross-OC group to make progress on this in a transparent and timely fashion - Discussions online before the call on how we start, and discuss at the next call

1 0

Recordings, Transcript DT-IPR Meeting on 1 December
by Brenda Brewer Dec. 1, 2015

Dec. 1, 2015

Dear all, The recordings and transcripts for the DT-IPR Meeting #4 on 1 December 2015 will be available here: https://community.icann.org/x/CsVYAw Kind regards, Brenda

1 0