My edits and comments are attached. Greg *Gregory S. Shatan **ï* *Abelman Frayne & Schwab* *666 Third Avenue **ï** New York, NY 10017-5621* *Direct* 212-885-9253 *| **Main* 212-949-9022 *Fax* 212-949-9190 *|* *Cell *917-816-6428 *gsshatan@lawabel.com <gsshatan@lawabel.com>* *ICANN-related: gregshatanipc@gmail.com <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> * *www.lawabel.com <http://www.lawabel.com/>* On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Robert Guerra <rguerra@privaterra.org> wrote:
concur with Milton and Chuck on this one.
Robert
On Dec 7, 2014, at 9:24 PM, Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu> wrote:
Yes, I agree. But the principle as formulated implies that every entity involved in management must be MS, which I think is excessive.
*From:* Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@verisign.com <cgomes@verisign.com>] *Sent:* Sunday, December 7, 2014 5:59 PM *To:* Milton L Mueller; Lise Fuhr; cwg-stewardship@icann.org *Subject:* RE: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles
Milton,
It is ineffective to literally manage in a multistakeholder way but it is possible to respect and follow multistakeholder developed policies in managing.
Chuck
*From:* Milton L Mueller [mailto:mueller@syr.edu <mueller@syr.edu>] *Sent:* Sunday, December 07, 2014 5:55 PM *To:* Gomes, Chuck; Lise Fuhr; cwg-stewardship@icann.org *Subject:* RE: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles
I dissent from principle g by the way. I could see why oversight of IANA might be multi-stakeholder, but management need not be.
-MM
*From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Gomes, Chuck *Sent:* Sunday, December 7, 2014 4:18 PM *To:* Lise Fuhr; cwg-stewardship@icann.org *Subject:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles
I made a couple more edits in item g at the end of the document.
Chuck
*From:* Gomes, Chuck *Sent:* Sunday, December 07, 2014 4:12 PM *To:* 'Lise Fuhr'; cwg-stewardship@icann.org *Subject:* RE: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles
I made a couple edits and suggested a third in my next to last comment. I also identified in my comments some possible action items that the CWG may need to perform as soon as possible assuming that the principles are adopted by the CWG.
Chuck
*From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Lise Fuhr *Sent:* Friday, December 05, 2014 8:34 AM *To:* cwg-stewardship@icann.org *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] Principles
Dear All,
We hereby send you a redline and a clean version of the Principles document. For the unresolved part, staff has done a table. We recommend that we focus on the outstanding issues, that are identified in the comments. We welcome any inputs on either the comments or on the redline draft. The document will be finalized on the next call.
Best regards, Martin and Lise _______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship