Dear Bertrand, still on the table so in no way a done deal. The ALAC WG on this topic has other (non contractual) alternative proposals which we are trying to refine. Kind regards, Olivier On 27/11/2014 14:05, Bertrand de La Chapelle wrote:
Is the idea of a contract Co. a done deal? Establishing any organization with whatever limited staff is usually a recipe for its growth in time.
Is the option of having separate complementary contracts by the different users of the IANA functions off the table?
B.
"/Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes/", Antoine de Saint Exupéry ("/There is no greater mission for humans than uniting humans/")
BERTRAND DE LA CHAPELLE Internet & Jurisdiction Project | Director
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org <mailto:avri@acm.org>> wrote:
Hi,
I think this has exactly a 180 degree wrong approach
• Contract Co. – This is a not for profit company whose only function is to be signatory to the contract with the IANA Functions Operator. As such this entity would have no staff.
I think that this should have nothing but staff, a minimal staff of one or two I.e it should have a neutral Administrator that does what the PRT tells her to do in terms of the contract adminstration, and perhaps a backup/aise. It could also be the Root Zone Management Process Administrator as that is a clerical staff function.
avri
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org <mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship