Hi all, Forwarding this to the broader group. --Grace Begin forwarded message: From: Elise Gerich <elise.gerich@icann.org<mailto:elise.gerich@icann.org>> Date: May 8, 2015 at 14:31:45 EDT To: Paul M Kane - CWG <paul.kane-cwg@icb.co.uk<mailto:paul.kane-cwg@icb.co.uk>> Cc: "dt1@icann.org<mailto:dt1@icann.org>" <dt1@icann.org<mailto:dt1@icann.org>>, Kim Davies <kim.davies@icann.org<mailto:kim.davies@icann.org>>, Samantha Eisner <Samantha.Eisner@icann.org<mailto:Samantha.Eisner@icann.org>>, Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org<mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [DTA - SLE] SLE Document with clarifying background info. Hi Paul, ICANN has published its response on the ICANN website to your request for workflow documents. https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/transparency-en I just wanted to send a quick note to confirm that you had received the response. Regards, -- Elise From: Paul M Kane - CWG <paul.kane-cwg@icb.co.uk<mailto:paul.kane-cwg@icb.co.uk>> Date: Friday, May 1, 2015 at 10:32 AM To: Elise Gerich <elise.gerich@icann.org<mailto:elise.gerich@icann.org>> Cc: "dt1@icann.org<mailto:dt1@icann.org>" <dt1@icann.org<mailto:dt1@icann.org>>, Kim Davies <kim.davies@icann.org<mailto:kim.davies@icann.org>>, Samantha Eisner <Samantha.Eisner@icann.org<mailto:Samantha.Eisner@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [DTA - SLE] SLE Document with clarifying background info. Thanks Elise - I appreciate you are trying to have the work-flow documents released to the SLE Design Team. Once we have the work-flow documents, it would be great to have a call to discuss how our findings of real-world activity ensure the SLE captures all aspects of the RZM process. I also welcome and agree with Theresa's comments below: Quoting Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart@icann.org<mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>>: We have no desire to affect the results of the community processes. We also believe that it would be more appropriate to maintain the status quo until the conclusion of the transition process to not pre-empt or create a perception of pre-empting any of the community consensus process around any areas in the finalization of the transition. Samantha - would you please expedite the process please. NTIA are yet to receive your request to share ICANN's internal IANA work-flow diagrams with the Design Team. Have a great w/end all Best Paul Quoting Elise Gerich <elise.gerich@icann.org<mailto:elise.gerich@icann.org>>: Hello Paul, We too would like to help you finalize the Service Level Expectation document and are awaiting all necessary authorizations to release the documents in question. May I suggest, in the mean time, that we schedule another teleconference with Design Team A to review line by line the SLEs that are in the draft document to understand what is requested and to provide preliminary feedback on feasibility of implementation. This would enable the design team to continue work on refining its draft. Best regards, -- Elise From: Paul M Kane - CWG <paul.kane-cwg@icb.co.uk<mailto:paul.kane-cwg@icb.co.uk>> Date: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 2:00 AM To: Elise Gerich <elise.gerich@icann.org<mailto:elise.gerich@icann.org>> Cc: "dt1@icann.org<mailto:dt1@icann.org>" <dt1@icann.org<mailto:dt1@icann.org>>, Kim Davies <kim.davies@icann.org<mailto:kim.davies@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [DTA - SLE] SLE Document with clarifying background info.
Morning Elise
We are trying to finalise the Service Level Expectation document for the IANA transition.
Would you please provide the work-flow documents you current have so we can capture what you are doing now and discuss with you which steps you consider are to be removed as part of NTIA's withdrawal from the process.
The balance of the IANA RZM work flow documents can follow and be discussed, later.
I understand that IANA RZM uses a ticketing system to initiate and receive emails to Registry customers. Please ensure that technical resource are available (as is standard industry practice) to enable IANA to automatically monitor each transaction and collect statistics on its customers use of the ticketing system.
Speak soon I hope
Best
Paul
Quoting Elise Gerich <elise.gerich@icann.org<mailto:elise.gerich@icann.org>>:
Hello Jay,
Paul¹s email requested ³access to all work-flow process documents² for the root zone management function. Including sub-processes, there are quite a few work flow processes for the root zone function. We are reviewing all of them as per the request.
Let me assure you we are not creating new documentation in response to the request, and we are proceeding as fast as possible to fulfill the request.
Best regards, -- Elise
From: Jay Daley <jay@nzrs.net.nz<mailto:jay@nzrs.net.nz>> Date: Sunday, April 19, 2015 at 1:33 PM To: "dt1@icann.org<mailto:dt1@icann.org>" <dt1@icann.org<mailto:dt1@icann.org>> Cc: Kim Davies <kim.davies@icann.org<mailto:kim.davies@icann.org>>, Elise Gerich <elise.gerich@icann.org<mailto:elise.gerich@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [DTA - SLE] SLE Document with clarifying background info.
Morning all
i don¹t see much point in us having this call without the documentation from IANA. The screenshot of the process flow (thanks Elise) looks pretty
much the
same as the process flow encoded in the expectations of the proposed SLA, so we really need to see the more detailed process flow to understand the issues Kim raised in the last call.
It sounds as if IANA are bundling a whole lot of things together to send us when we would benefit from the process flow being sent as soon as possible (since it must already exist, all it requires is NTIA permission). The other documents, currently being written, can come later.
If we do go ahead then I can make this time. If we bring it forward an hour then I can only join for 30 minutes (school run).
cheers Jay
On 17/04/2015, at 9:16 pm, Patricio Poblete <patricio.poblete@gmail.com<mailto:patricio.poblete@gmail.com>> wrote:
Paul,
I cannot join the call at this hour (6 pm) in Chile, but I could if it was one hour earlier.
Patricio P. S. Please announce also the UTC time
On Apr 17, 2015 4:29 AM, "Paul M Kane - CWG" <paul.kane-cwg@icb.co.uk<mailto:paul.kane-cwg@icb.co.uk>> wrote:
To give ICANN legal more time to facilitate disclosure of the required info may I suggest the time of next call is put back to Monday 20th
This also gives us time to review our document
To have as many participants involved in the call can I suggest
Tuesday 9am Auckland time Monday 10 pm London time Monday 5pm EST New York Monday 2 pm PST LA time
I think the above is correct......
Could everyone that is able to attend please confirm if this works for them
Have a great w/end
Best
Paul
Quoting Kim Davies <kim.davies@icann.org<mailto:kim.davies@icann.org>>:
>>> > Hi Paul, >>> > >> >>>> > > Would you please ask ICANN legal to check that NTIA has been sent the >> >>>> > > disclosure request for IANA Root Services. >>> > >>> > ICANN is still preparing the bundle of materials that is responsive to >> your >>> > request. Once it has completed the internal review process it will be >> sent to >>> > NTIA for their permission to disclose. As we noted on the call, ICANN is >>> > doing this as quickly as possible ‹ not just for this Design Team but >> others >>> > that have asked for information ‹ but it is not an instantaneous >> process. >>> > The DIDP process is lead by ICANN¹s Legal department but they have asked us >>> > in IANA for clarifications and help compiling the relevant
internal
>>> > documentation. >>> > >> >>>> > > Can the SLE DT we have a call on Monday (20th) next week to run >>>> through >>> > your >> >>>> > > comments and all being well the flow charts to make sure the SLE is >>> > complete. >> >>>> > > What time (morning) works for you? >>> > >>> > At this stage, it looks like I can accommodate any reasonable time on >>> > Monday. >>> > >>> > kim
_______________________________________________ dt1 mailing list dt1@icann.org<mailto:dt1@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/dt1
_______________________________________________ dt1 mailing list dt1@icann.org<mailto:dt1@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/dt1
-- Jay Daley Chief Executive NZRS Ltd desk: +64 4 931 6977 mobile: +64 21 678840 linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/jaydaley<http://www.linkedin.com/in/jaydaley>