But what would the thresholds be? And, currently an SIFR comes as a result of other mechanisms being exhausted as well as the IANA probems resolution process. /The Special IFR would be triggered by a supermajority vote of each of the ccNSO and GNSO Councils according to their normal procedures for determining supermajority. / Would we require a supermajority of only the Board, or in addition to the ccNSO and GNSO. And as a result of the mechanisms being exhausted? I would assume so. Matthew On 6/5/2015 4:05 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
I can't --MM
-----Original Message----- From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship- bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2015 5:02 PM To: avri@acm.org; cwg-stewardship@icann.org Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Final response from DT-M regarding public comments
Good catch Avri and good question. Can anyone think of a reason why the ICANN Board should not be able to request an SIFR?
Chuck
-----Original Message----- From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship- bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 4:39 PM To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Final response from DT-M regarding public comments
Hi,
I am part of DT-M and partly responsible for this.
But. It has a cost, which I did mention on the DT-M list:
There is currently no mechanism defined for the Board to initiate a SIFR.
Should there be?
avri
On 04-Jun-15 16:10, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
Here is DT-M's final proposed response to comment review tool item # 246 regarding AFRALO's suggestion that the PTI Board be allowed to initiate a SIFR directly: *"DT M carefully considered the recommendation to allow the PTI Board to initiate a Special IFR but decided against that while at the same time noting that the PTI Board could request that the ICANN Board consider doing so."*
If there are any questions, please let me know.
Chuck
"This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, notify sender immediately and delete this message immediately."
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship _______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
-- Matthew Shears Global Internet Policy and Human Rights Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT) + 44 (0)771 247 2987