I keep starting to make the same mistake as Avri. I suggest that the file naming be more carefully done to not duplicate the use of key RFP section names. Using a RFP Subsection number like ‘2B’ in the file name for a principles document should be avoided going forward. Chuck From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Guru Acharya Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 10:49 PM To: Avri Doria Cc: cwg-stewardship@icann.org Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: FW: CWG RFP2B Proposal Avri - You got the wrong thread. This thread is for RFP2B and not the principles. And your suggested principle for a multi-stakeholder composition of the oversight council appears to be in contradiction to Strawman 1 and ignores the range of discussions that happened on this list about the composition. On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 6:13 AM, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org<mailto:avri@acm.org>> wrote: Hi, I have suggested a few edits to the doc. hope I did it in the mandated manner. the changes refer to - transparency and requirements that any and all audit reports be published. - bottom-up modalities - multistakeholder nature of any committee or oversight arrangements. Hope I did not mess up any of the formatting. avri _______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship