That’s hard for me to imagine Seun but we can agree to disagree on that. Chuck From: Seun Ojedeji [mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 8:39 PM To: Gomes, Chuck Cc: cwg-stewardship@icann.org Subject: RE: [CWG-Stewardship] Legal Advice - Client Committee Hi Chuck, I think having those 3 people, i.e Greg, Alan, and Paul on the team will most likely speedup the process of live interaction/answering questions. I would see the remaining 3 i.e the Co-chairs and Maarten as moderators and I expect there will be adequate discipline among the team. Regards sent from Google nexus 4 kindly excuse brevity and typos. On 23 Jan 2015 22:49, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com<mailto:cgomes@verisign.com>> wrote: Seun, It was not Greg but me who raised the expense issue. I assume that the advice we receive will come from written documents we provide and from live discussions between the expert(s) and the client committee. Regarding the latter, I think the larger the client team is, the longer the discussions will take thereby using more hours of the expert(s)’ billable hours. Of course, all of this depends on the cost structure of the arrangement. If there is no live interaction between the client committee and the expert(s), you may be right about a group of six, but if there is I think that six would be too many. Just my opinion. Chuck From: Seun Ojedeji [mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com<mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 4:21 PM To: Gomes, Chuck Cc: Donna Austin; Cheryl Langdon-Orr; cwg-stewardship@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org> Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Legal Advice - Client Committee sent from Google nexus 4 kindly excuse brevity and typos. On 23 Jan 2015 21:25, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com<mailto:cgomes@verisign.com>> wrote:
Keep in mind that the client committee is for selecting and interacting with the legal expert(s), not for preparing the questions. All of us will have input regarding the questions. If we add the author of each major proposal, the client team will become too large in my opinion. The larger the client team is the more expensive the consultation will be.
Hello Greg, I don't think I understand where the "expensive" will come to play. I agree that having many people may slow down the process (especially if everyone wants to have a say), however I don't think that is the kind of expense you are referring to? Just to be clear, below is what I understand to be the role of the client team: - Shortlist and select a legal council org (through remote based tools) - Be on standby to answer any question requiring layman clarification on the questions from the doc by the legal council - Regularly update the CWG on status - Receive final report from council and forward (without modification) to the CWG Considering that we have 3 variants of proposal, I think it will be logical to recognise that you understand contract co very well, Alan has understanding of the bylaw approach, while Chris/Paul understands "trust"option. I don't think 6 is a big number since they will only be responding to questions from the legal council. On a lighter note, it may be good to define and document the role of the client team for proper reference. Regards
Chuck
From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org>] On Behalf Of Donna Austin Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 3:13 PM To: Cheryl Langdon-Orr Cc: cwg-stewardship@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Legal Advice - Client Committee
Agreed Cheryl.
Thanks,
Donna
DONNA AUSTIN Policy and Industry Affairs Manager
ARI REGISTRY SERVICES Melbourne | Los Angeles P +1 310 890 9655<tel:%2B1%20310%20890%209655> P +61 3 9866 3710<tel:%2B61%203%209866%203710> E donna.austin@ariservices.com<mailto:donna.austin@ariservices.com> W www.ariservices.com<http://www.ariservices.com>
Follow us on Twitter
The information contained in this communication is intended for the named recipients only. It is subject to copyright and may contain legally privileged and confidential information and if you are not an intended recipient you must not use, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this communication in error, please delete all copies from your system and notify us immediately.
From: Cheryl Langdon-Orr [mailto:langdonorr@gmail.com<mailto:langdonorr@gmail.com>] Sent: Friday, 23 January 2015 12:05 PM To: Donna Austin Cc: Jonathan Robinson; cwg-stewardship@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org> Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Legal Advice - Client Committee
Indeed Donna, I couldn't agree with you more, although to ensure that all these additional matters re 'trust' are properly framed and dealt with in a timely fashion, I would have thought calling on say Alan Greenberg and Paul Szyndler to contribute via serving on the client committee would have been wise
On Jan 24, 2015 5:19 AM, "Donna Austin" <Donna.Austin@ariservices.com<mailto:Donna.Austin@ariservices.com>> wrote:
Hi Jonathan
I have no objection to the committee as you propose, but it was obvious from the RFP3(b) call this morning that we may have more questions related to ‘trusts’ that we would like some answers to.
Not sure that this impacts the composition of the committee, but it may be that we have more questions to be incorporated into any work effort.
Thanks,
Donna
DONNA AUSTIN Policy and Industry Affairs Manager
ARI REGISTRY SERVICES Melbourne | Los Angeles P +1 310 890 9655<tel:%2B1%20310%20890%209655> P +61 3 9866 3710<tel:%2B61%203%209866%203710> E donna.austin@ariservices.com<mailto:donna.austin@ariservices.com> W www.ariservices.com<http://www.ariservices.com>
Follow us on Twitter
The information contained in this communication is intended for the named recipients only. It is subject to copyright and may contain legally privileged and confidential information and if you are not an intended recipient you must not use, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this communication in error, please delete all copies from your system and notify us immediately.
From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org>] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson Sent: Friday, 23 January 2015 9:58 AM To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Legal Advice - Client Committee
All,
As you know, legal advice to the CWG is on the critical path for our work. It is now both essential and urgent to get the ball rolling.
To this extent, and as discussed at our recent meeting, we require a client committee which represents the group, has legal expertise and is available to brief and work with the lawyers.
From the volunteers, we had two lawyers make themselves available (Greg & Maarten) and so, together with the co-chairs, we will work with this small team of four in the first instance.
1. Greg Shatan (Partner at Abelman Frayne & Schwab)
2. Maarten Simon (General Counsel at SIDN)
3. Lise Fuhr (Co-chair)
4. Jonathan Robinson (Co-chair)
We believe that this will keep us appropriately qualified, sufficiently fleet footed and closely connected to work and requirements of the CWG.
Thank-you,
Jonathan & Lise
CWG Co-Chairs
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship