Yes. Cheers, Chris On 27 Mar 2015, at 02:49 , Jordan Carter <jordan@internetnz.net.nz> wrote:
The implication of this letter from the ccNSO is that it will only proceed to approval with final proposals available for prior community review.
And so as a result, the combined timetable we have been working to is not achievable: that chartering organisation will only be able to approve at/after an ICANN meeting, not before hand. It would be either Buenos Aires, or Dublin.
Am I reading this right?
best Jordan
On 26 March 2015 at 17:13, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote:
From: Byron Holland [mailto:byron.holland@cira.ca] Sent: 26 March 2015 17:04 To: rickert@anwaelte.de; leonfelipe@sanchez.mx; lise.fuhr@difo.dk; Mathieu Weill; jrobinson@afilias.info Cc: ccnso-council@icann.org Subject: Letter ccNSO Decision-Making Process
Dear Lise, Jonathan, Leon, Mathieu, and Thomas,
Please find attached a letter on behalf of the ccNSO Council.
Kind regards,
Byron
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
-- Jordan Carter
Chief Executive InternetNZ
04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob) jordan@internetnz.net.nz Skype: jordancarter
A better world through a better Internet
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship