Unless there was an extraordinary meeting of the ccNSO(Is that possible?) outside of the general ICANN meeting process I think we are reading it the same way yes. On 26 Mar 2015, at 17:49, Jordan Carter <jordan@internetnz.net.nz<mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz>> wrote: The implication of this letter from the ccNSO is that it will only proceed to approval with final proposals available for prior community review. And so as a result, the combined timetable we have been working to is not achievable: that chartering organisation will only be able to approve at/after an ICANN meeting, not before hand. It would be either Buenos Aires, or Dublin. Am I reading this right? best Jordan On 26 March 2015 at 17:13, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info<mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info>> wrote: From: Byron Holland [mailto:byron.holland@cira.ca<mailto:byron.holland@cira.ca>] Sent: 26 March 2015 17:04 To: rickert@anwaelte.de<mailto:rickert@anwaelte.de>; leonfelipe@sanchez.mx<mailto:leonfelipe@sanchez.mx>; lise.fuhr@difo.dk<mailto:lise.fuhr@difo.dk>; Mathieu Weill; jrobinson@afilias.info<mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info> Cc: ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: Letter ccNSO Decision-Making Process Dear Lise, Jonathan, Leon, Mathieu, and Thomas, Please find attached a letter on behalf of the ccNSO Council. Kind regards, Byron _______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship -- Jordan Carter Chief Executive InternetNZ 04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob) jordan@internetnz.net.nz<mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz> Skype: jordancarter A better world through a better Internet _______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

Yes that's correct, however I think things are still pretty much in line, maybe extension of the COs submission period (which is currently 21days from end of may to mid June) by 1 or 2 weeks will suffice. More importantly, I think the outcome of the public comment would really determine how smooth the CO comment phase will look like. Cheers! sent from Google nexus 4 kindly excuse brevity and typos. On 26 Mar 2015 16:50, "Jordan Carter" <jordan@internetnz.net.nz> wrote:

The implication of this letter from the ccNSO is that it will only proceed to approval with final proposals available for prior community review.

And so as a result, the combined timetable we have been working to is not achievable: that chartering organisation will only be able to approve at/after an ICANN meeting, not before hand. It would be either Buenos Aires, or Dublin.

Am I reading this right?

best Jordan

On 26 March 2015 at 17:13, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote:

...

*From:* Byron Holland [mailto:byron.holland@cira.ca] *Sent:* 26 March 2015 17:04 *To:* rickert@anwaelte.de; leonfelipe@sanchez.mx; lise.fuhr@difo.dk; Mathieu Weill; jrobinson@afilias.info *Cc:* ccnso-council@icann.org *Subject:* Letter ccNSO Decision-Making Process

Dear Lise, Jonathan, Leon, Mathieu, and Thomas,

Please find attached a letter on behalf of the ccNSO Council.

Kind regards,

Byron

_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

-- Jordan Carter

Chief Executive *InternetNZ*

04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob) jordan@internetnz.net.nz Skype: jordancarter

*A better world through a better Internet *

_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship