Dear all, The notes, recordings and transcripts for the CWG IANA Call #25 03 March are available here: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=52890431 Action Items * Action: Chairs will get back to group with DT list and priorities * Action: Would like an additional GAC person for IAP Team * Action: Scope document produced before next meeting * Action: Call for volunteers to join DTs * Action: Paul and Elise solve the last issue with Martin * Action: Stephanie to put forth wording proposal for multistakeholder text Notes 1. Opening Remarks * No outstanding action items * No longer RFP subgroups * DT groups will work * Working on getting legal advice 2. Final Review of Design Team Method * List of DTs: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocwgdtstwrdshp/Design+Teams+List * Are there "rules" for volunteering? If there are too many people who want to join a DT, Chairs will do selection (expertise and time commitment based) 3. Review scope of DTA and DTB and launch * Service Levels Expectations (lead: Paul Kane) * IAP (lead: Allan MacGillivray) * CSC (lead: Donna Austin) * Each team will have its own mailing list which will be publically archived SLE Team * Paul Kane: SLE group will review the status quo * 3 gTLD reps: Jeff Eckhaus; Jeff Neuman; and Elaine Prius. * 3 ccTLD reps: Jay Daley, (AP Region), Patricio Poblete (LAC Region) and Paul Kane (Europe) * IANA staff and SSAC can provide liaisons but that may need to be handled privately * First slide is data taken from IANA site * IANA service is efficient when it comes to sending NTIA requests (when NTIA is removed, the delay is removed) * Deliverable (part 1): Identify IANA workflow process and document it * At the moment the group is not looking at how SLAs will be amended in the future. IAP Team * Allan MacGillivray sends his apologies (Lise will present for him) * Team includes: Maarten Simon and Elise Lindeberg * Action: Would like an additional GAC person CSC Team * Donna Austin will lead * Staffan Jonson has volunteered * Action: Scope document produced before next meeting 4. Review Structure of CWG Proposal v2.0 * sent out prior to meeting last Thursday, but many commented that they required more time to review * now that time has passed, are there any questions? * Still possible to send in proposals for DTs (and scoping document please) 5. Update on Client Committee work Update from Greg Shatan * Over the course of past several days, the Committee met with the 3 shortlisted firms * In each case, the corporate governance expert was the main focus/team lead * Had debrief call on Monday afternoon (John Jeffrey; Sam Eisner; Kevin Espinola from ICANN were there but reclused themselves from decisions) * Front runner has emerged, and focus is now on 'nuts&bolts' of engagement: 1) matching the need for public and transparent process; and 2) structure of fee relationship, engagement letter, etc. * Greg is checking with firms before releasing names of firms * All firms understand political situation in DC * No firm budget but the idea is to manage this in a cost-effective way * End of this week or early next week for engagement 6. Discuss Principles - Path Forward Presented by Martin. * Review of gii - currently two options. CWG to identify whether there is a strong preference for or objection to either option. * Action: Paul and Elise solve the last issue with Martin * Review of evi - * For the remaining items, probably easiest to start at top of document go through open comments from group * Action: Stephanie to put forth wording proposal for multistakeholder text 7. AOB & Review of Action Items * Action: Chairs will get back to group with DT list and priorities * Action: Would like an additional GAC person for IAP Team * Action: Scope document produced before next meeting * Action: Call for volunteers to join DTs * Action: Paul and Elise solve the last issue with Martin * Action: Stephanie to put forth wording proposal for multistakeholder text 8. Closing Remarks Next call is Thursday at 11:00 UTC.
