I don't know how many times I questioned the very short window allotted for SO/AC approval but it was mostly ignored. I think it is unfortunate that the ccNSO is admitting that now instead of several months ago. Chuck From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 11:13 AM To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: Letter ccNSO Decision-Making Process From: Byron Holland [mailto:byron.holland@cira.ca] Sent: 26 March 2015 17:04 To: rickert@anwaelte.de<mailto:rickert@anwaelte.de>; leonfelipe@sanchez.mx<mailto:leonfelipe@sanchez.mx>; lise.fuhr@difo.dk<mailto:lise.fuhr@difo.dk>; Mathieu Weill; jrobinson@afilias.info<mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info> Cc: ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: Letter ccNSO Decision-Making Process Dear Lise, Jonathan, Leon, Mathieu, and Thomas, Please find attached a letter on behalf of the ccNSO Council. Kind regards, Byron