On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 6:25 AM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
Seun:
Perhaps you failed to understand that an RFP3b list would have all the same people subscribed to it (i.e., everybody). So everybody in this group would see these messages. Creating a new RFP3b list only serves to organize the discussion of an alternative for easier review and archiving. I have no idea how you would reasonably believe this evidences a lack of good intent.
Well as far as i am concerned discussions about the alternate options has been happening on this list and would be preferred to continue, whether it was formerly recognised is another issue all together. I am saying this because in future i would not be surprised to see someone relate the message volume on the new list to level of support (not that i am mostly worried about that, everyone has his opinion)
I would ask that you reconsider this accusation that I am acting out of a lack of "good intent." This sort of attack on my character is counterproductive and disappointing,
Well maybe "lack of good intent" is not the appropriate phrase to describe the sense of segregation that is being created on this list. Its interesting you havn't noticed that but could easily notice mine, so i apologise if it felt personal to you. SNIP
Thank you.
Thanks too Regards
Greg Shatan
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
I believe the list will have the same characteristics (full list) but will have a new name and address. So it will be a "clone" but not the same list.
Well i would have readily agreed to this, if not for the fact that i don't think its of good intent. We developed the CWG proposal on this list, and should continue to use the rfp3 list for any other options.
Anyone who is not interested could hit delete whenever the mails hits his/her box
Regards
Greg
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Allan MacGillivray < allan.macgillivray@cira.ca> wrote:
Jaap - I believe that we have decided that RFP3b will have the same email list as RFP3, that is, the full CWG list.
Allan
-----Original Message----- From: Jaap Akkerhuis [mailto:jaap@NLnetLabs.nl] Sent: January-09-15 4:21 PM To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org Cc: Allan MacGillivray; Jonathan Robinson Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] RFP 3 Sub-Group (AKA RFP 3b) - CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS
I probably don't have time to be active but if there will be a separate mail list I would like to lurk on it.
jaap _______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb: http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng <seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng>*
The key to understanding is humility - my view !
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb: http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng <seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng>* The key to understanding is humility - my view !