Hi, I believe we will need some bylaws changes, - we discussed that the IANA Review Team would be one of the AOC-like review that CCWG is currently proposing be put in the bylaws. CCWG has a place holder for that one in their work. - the first golden bylaw, now fundamental bylaw, I ever heard discussed was the original Nuclear-RFP bylaw. the Separation mechansim is an escalation mechanism version of that original nuclear option, and I believe one that would need to be defined by a bylaw. - all of the ongoing groups, e.g. SOAC, with a degree of powers are all defined in the bylaws. It seemed to me that for the CSC to be real, it would need to be defined in a bylaw. I admit, no else has indicated that, just seems that way to me. I can't think of any others, yet until today, it had not occurred to me that we might need one for the CSC. So I figure there might be others and it is the sort of thing we should understand. avri On 17-Apr-15 09:17, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
Do we need them for the IANA Review Team (formally the Periodic Review Team)?
Chuck
*From:*cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Avri Doria *Sent:* Friday, April 17, 2015 7:56 AM *To:* cwg-stewardship@icann.org *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] Bylaws requirements for CWG
Hi,
Was thinking about bylaws for DT-N Review and DT-X Separation mechanism and realized that we might also need one to establish the CSC.
What other bylaws might the CWG need. We should probably make a list.
avri
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avast logo <http://www.avast.com/>
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com <http://www.avast.com/>
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com