My assumption is that each organization would be wholly responsible for its appointee. If the RZERC as a whole had concerns about a member, they could certainly communicate the concerns to the appointing organization. Chuck -----Original Message----- From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 2:35 AM To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] RZERC member qualification criteria On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 08:18:11PM +0000, Yuko Green wrote:
* Appointees to the RZERC must have a strong overall understanding of the Root Zone, and must be able to fully represent their appointing organization's particular interest in the root zone.
How is this criterion evaluated? What would happen if an organization appointed someone to the RZERC and some other organization disagreed about that person's qualification? Best regards, A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship