All, Latest, Aug. 21, version of the PC2 tool for public comments attached. this includes the comments from: - the Heritage Foundation - the ICANN Board Given the tool does not provide a view of complete responses and how they were analyzed I have included two additional files one for each of the Heritage Foundation and the ICANN Board submissions where I have amalgamated the relative comments from the PC2 tool at the end these original submissions - let me know if you find this useful. Also please note the following from the ICANN Board submission regarding their original list of questions to the CCWG: - While the detailed review work is still forthcoming, a preliminary review of the Proposal indicates that there are still some areas where key details will need to be finalized before the transition of the stewardship from NTIA can occur. Below are some examples of areas that need to be finalized or improved. Our fiduciary duty as Board members requires us to understand the operational impacts of the recommendations that the community will be asking the Board to accept in the near future, so the Board will work to identify the open areas that need to be finalized. *The earlier questions provided by the Board to the CCWG were an attempt to point out areas where additional information or considerations would be helpful in supporting the proposal. While the shift to the sole member model has removed some of the questions about individual parts of the ICANN community being able to exercise statutory powers, the Board’s intent was and continues to be that the questions serve as guidance to the CCWG in considering whether sufficient detail is in place within the proposal.* *Cheers* *B.*