Some comments: EPDP1 - 2B - It seems that an added question of whether the thin to thick transition should continue or be reversed is in order, otherwise the only thick registries in a few years could be the currently thin ones EPDP1 - 2H - Not all EBERO transitions are done without registry data. It's foreseen that using zone files plus data escrow is a last resort, but the first attempt would be to use data from the failing registry. EPDP2 - D - While the rules/policies to access data already encompasses what I will mention, I noticed that some misunderstanding in the community came out of assuming that accredited parties will have unlimited "all you can eat" access. I don't think the scope matrix even suggests that to be the case, but perhaps detailing this as question could help building bridges in the community and allow for a more collegial discussion of how it will work. Rubens
On 27 Jun 2018, at 06:45, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:
Dear All,
On behalf of Keith, please find attached the scope matrix that was referenced during the discussions yesterday.
Best regards,
Marika
Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org <mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>
Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses <http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages <http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-e...>.
<Mail Attachment>_______________________________________________ Epdp-dt mailing list Epdp-dt@icann.org <mailto:Epdp-dt@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/epdp-dt <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/epdp-dt>