Thanks- All good points; I agree this particular EPDP needs a narrow scope As hinted at below, perhaps this new law is one whose impacts (if any) can be addressed through a traditional PDP. In the future I hope we become better at respecting and understanding the impact of national laws on our activities. Best wishes, Ayden ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On 1 July 2018 2:13 PM, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@nic.br> wrote:
I would hope that ICANN do things differently this time for a legislation with an effective date so well ahead, by not resorting to any emergency mechanisms, neither a Temp Spec or an EPDP.
Rubens
On 30 Jun 2018, at 20:08, Austin, Donna via Epdp-dt <epdp-dt@icann.org> wrote:
Ayden
This EPDP has a very narrow focus to confirm or not the Temporary Specification. I do not support anything broader.
Donna
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 30, 2018, at 2:03 PM, Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com> wrote:
While this law takes effect from 1 January 2020, given its similarities to the GDPR and the fact it has been adopted in ICANN's place of incorporation, I would suggest we should consider the impact of this piece of legislation on the work of the EPDP as well.
California Unanimously Passes Historic Privacy Bill [https://www.wired.com/story/california-unanimously-passes-historic-privacy-bill/](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.wired.com_story_california-2Dunanimously-2Dpasses-2Dhistoric-2Dprivacy-2Dbill_&d=DwMGaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=CwipU91YB6EkpFXK9ynnT_QUef4yC5p7jpsDm8cU97g&m=nh66PSOmmYqedyGLv7sehC48ws-UR8bFMCth8uybRsI&s=Tj_qLIU6tyURGRl0cRw8oUqHazikaFqLHqpYZ2e1HE4&e=)
Best wishes, Ayden Férdeline
_______________________________________________ Epdp-dt mailing list Epdp-dt@icann.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_li...
_______________________________________________ Epdp-dt mailing list Epdp-dt@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/epdp-dt