Could not both be combined - asking if people are interested in working on one of the working groups and letting them select from them (as many as they like) - but then also providing 3 opportunities for respondents to fill in if they are interested in other areas of work, and tell a bit about why those interest them? Otherwise those taking the survey will not even know what areas are already being worked on which they might be interested in - and where input is (in some cases urgently) needed. On 8 Jul 2007, at 13:58, Wolf Ludwig wrote:
Hi all,
If I didn’t miss something, the following ICANN-related topics were suggested so far: ->Protection of Registrants in relation to Registrars (RAA amendments) ->IPv6 ->IDNs ->DNSSEC ->gTLD process ->ICANN Geographic Regions (a joint interest with the ccNSO)
->Privacy and Whois ->Price development in the registration sphere ->DNS and Freedom of expression. ->ICANN reform, and the GNSO reform recommendations re constituency restructuring ->public sphere and concerns.
In the suggested survey (by Vittorio) among ALSes I think it would be better not to mention these issues already (and to offer a kind of multiple choice) but to leave it up to the ALSes to tell their 3 main concerns and priorities.
Such a survey could be done in the following format and comprise questions like:
Organisation / ALS:
Representative / contact point:
What should be, according to your organizational targets, the main issues and priorities for an EURALO working programme 2007-08? 1. 2. 3.
Please give a short explanation why these issues are of prior relevance for your organisation.
Would you (representative/contact point) or another person of your organisation like to contribute to EURALO’s work in respect to your suggested priorities?
What do you suggest or expect EURALO should concentrate on in the next two years under assumed limited capacities?
Best, Wolf
Kleinwächter, Wolfgang wrote Sun, 08 Jul 2007 14:21:
Vittorio: 2 Work plan We could specifically ask all ALSes to suggest the three most important ICANN-related issues that they see, for example. Also, some of us should participate in the ALAC working groups on various issues, that are going to start working soon.
Wolfgang:
Vittorio, this is a good proposal I support this.
Vittorio:
** We could meet in Geneva on the first weekend in September preceding > the next open consultation of the IGF. ** We could meet in mid October in Warsaw at Wolfgang's > Studienkreismeeting (Oct. 10/11).>
Wolfgang: As said in an earlier mail this is an offer. Formally the EURALO Board has to make a decision and, if it comes to funding, formulate a request to Nick. Nick told me that no request has arrived so far and his argument was, that EURALO had already its regional funding in Lisbon. I told him that in Lisbon, there was no EURALO Board and it would be useful for the Board members, to have at least one F2F meeting before LA.
_______________________________________________ EURO-Discuss mailing list EURO-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro- discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org
comunica-ch phone +41 79 204 83 87 www.comunica-ch.net
http://blog.allmend.ch - Digitale Allmend
_______________________________________________ EURO-Discuss mailing list EURO-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro- discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org