Annette Muehlberg ha scritto:
I very much hope that there is not a serious discussion on deliberately excluding accredited ALSes which happened to have no chance to attend the Lisbon Meeting. This is certainly not something I would have given my signature for.
No one wants to exclude anyone. But you also have to understand the feelings among people who spared one week of their life to come to Lisbon, went through three days of hard discussions, with some very heated moments, went to a great distance to reach compromise and consensus, and now see people asking to change again what had been agreed. Anyway, I think that there is ample opportunity for making everyone happy! This said; the MoU and Bylaws have been agreed and signed both by Paul Twomey and by a number of ALSes, there is no way that they can be changed again. But if you think you need more time for the phases of the election process that was agreed, I am personally fine with allowing for some more time to let Easter pass - for example, 1-22 April for nominations, 23-29 April for discussion, 30 Apr-6 May for consensus building, and 7-11 May for voting. Would that be ok? By the way, the later we go, the lesser are the chances that we can have a GA before the San Juan ICANN meeting. -- vb. Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu <-------- --------> finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/ <--------