April 4, 2007
11:35 a.m.
All, I see that the discussion is again getting polarized - with people stacking on the two extreme options. Would the middle ground of April 22 be acceptable to everyone? So that we can close the discussion and start discussing nominations. The only other option is to stick to the process agreed in Lisbon, which is the default if we can't agree to change it. But I really think that if we all are reasonable, then we can find a compromise that is good for everyone. So, does anyone really object to April 22? Thanks, -- vb. Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu <-------- --------> finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/ <--------