thanks Marika! yep — i took a look at Suzanne’s suggestions and decided that i was working at a different level of detail — the page that she’s suggesting steps for has been broken down into several pages in this draft. so rather than putting things in the wrong place, i thought i’d wait until we were on the phone together to figure out where to put them. mikey On Jan 16, 2014, at 8:44 AM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:
Hi Mikey, all,
I've had a look through the document and made some proposed edits / additions in red (where it would allow me) - see attached. I think this is a useful exercise in understanding the current PDP and opportunities for engagement, however it does not capture or address some of the steps proposed by Suzanne a while back, which was included in the Word document (see also attached – including Mikey's comments). Of course, one possible approach could be for the group to work through the existing opportunities first and decide if/how these can be improved, following which you may have a clearer idea of what is still missing.
Best regards,
Marika
From: Mike O'Connor <mike@haven2.com> Date: Tuesday 14 January 2014 17:50 To: "GAC-GNSO-CG@icann.org" <GAC-GNSO-CG@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] a first-try at the first-half of the GNSO PDP process diagram
hi all,
i’ve bashed through the rest of the process diagram. so now it’s more complete, although still badly in need of review and revision.
if i were in charge, i’d probably suggest that we go through it together on a call — just to familiarize people with it and elicit the first round of questions. would it be OK if i took about 15 minutes on our next call for a quick overview?
for all you GNSO process-expert type people (Marika, this means you!) — feel free to wing corrections my way.
thanks,
mikey
<GAC Engagement in GNSO PDP - MO questions[1].doc><PDP Graphics - GAC-GNSO v1 - MK.ppt>
PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)