Thanks, Sara! What do others think of this proposed language? -----Original Message----- From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of gtheo Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 3:27 AM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Updates, action items following 1 August PP IRT call I like that language, Sara. Thanks, Theo Sara Bockey schreef op 2017-08-02 11:33 PM:

Hi All,

Regarding Section 3.5.4.1, what if we used language that provided some flexibility regarding the time frame? For example:

A Customer's willful provision of inaccurate or unreliable information, its willful failure to update information provided to Provider within seven (7) days of any change, OR ITS FAILURE TO RESPOND TO PROVIDER INQUIRIES WITHIN THE TIME FRAME REQUIRED BY PROVIDER’S TOS (NOT TO EXCEED (15) DAYS) concerning the accuracy of contact details associated with the Registered Name for which Provider is providing the Services constitute a material breach of the service agreement between such Customer and Provider and be a basis for suspension or cancellation of the Services.

Sara

SARA BOCKEY

POLICY MANAGER | GODADDY™

SBOCKEY@GODADDY.COM 480-366-3616

SKYPE: SBOCKEY

_This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential information. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy of this message and its attachments._

FROM: <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Amy Bivins <amy.bivins@icann.org> REPLY-TO: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> DATE: Tuesday, August 1, 2017 at 12:32 PM TO: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> SUBJECT: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Updates, action items following 1 August PP IRT call

Dear Colleagues,

Thanks so much for your active participation on today’s Privacy/Proxy IRT call. We made a lot of progress. If you were unable to attend, the recording and materials are available on the wiki, https://community.icann.org/display/IRT/01+August+2017.

I’ve updated the issues list (attached) for the topics discussed today (Issues 5, 6, 9, 10, 13) based on your feedback.

IRT ACTION ITEMS

* Please provide any additional input you have on issues 5, 6, 9, 10, and 13 NO LATER THAN NEXT MONDAY, 7 AUGUST. In particular, please consider the following questions that arose during today’s meeting:

* Regarding issue 6 (Section 3.5.4.1 of the draft PPAA), should we consider reducing the required period from 15 days to some shortened period? If yes, do you have recommendations for what the shortened time period should be? * Regarding issue 13 (PPAA section 5.7.1): (i) Is it feasible for a registrar to block new registrations from a suspended provider (provided that provider is identified by its ICANN ID during the registration process)? (IRT input on this point has been mixed); (ii) If the answer to (i) is yes, is any additional language required with respect to Point 5 raised during the call (“sounds like we need an EPP for PP Providers”)?

* Please complete the IRT poll re: data escrow and additional PPAA discussion topics no later than Friday, 4 August, https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/62XCMSS

NEXT WEEK

Next week, we plan to discuss Issues 4 and 23(data retention), 12 (accreditation term), 15 (Customer Data Accuracy Spec), 17-19 (LEA Specification). We will discuss data retention and the LEA specification first, to ensure we can discuss both of these while we have our PSWG colleagues on the call.

Thanks in advance for your continued consideration of the issues discussed today and your completion of the poll. If you have questions or comments before our next meeting, please send them to the list.

Best,

Amy

AMY E. BIVINS

Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager

Registrar Services and Industry Relations

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551

Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104

Email: amy.bivins@icann.org

www.icann.org [1]

Links: ------ [1] http://www.icann.org _______________________________________________ Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl

Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl

I also support Sara’s language. From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Darcy Southwell Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2017 12:20 PM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Updates, action items following 1 August PP IRT call I support Sara’s proposed language. From: <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Amy Bivins <amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org>> Reply-To: <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>> Date: Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 6:22 AM To: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Updates, action items following 1 August PP IRT call Thanks, Sara! What do others think of this proposed language? -----Original Message----- From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of gtheo Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 3:27 AM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Updates, action items following 1 August PP IRT call I like that language, Sara. Thanks, Theo Sara Bockey schreef op 2017-08-02 11:33 PM: Hi All, Regarding Section 3.5.4.1, what if we used language that provided some flexibility regarding the time frame? For example: A Customer's willful provision of inaccurate or unreliable information, its willful failure to update information provided to Provider within seven (7) days of any change, OR ITS FAILURE TO RESPOND TO PROVIDER INQUIRIES WITHIN THE TIME FRAME REQUIRED BY PROVIDER’S TOS (NOT TO EXCEED (15) DAYS) concerning the accuracy of contact details associated with the Registered Name for which Provider is providing the Services constitute a material breach of the service agreement between such Customer and Provider and be a basis for suspension or cancellation of the Services. Sara SARA BOCKEY POLICY MANAGER | GODADDY™ SBOCKEY@GODADDY.COM<mailto:SBOCKEY@GODADDY.COM> 480-366-3616 SKYPE: SBOCKEY _This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential information. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy of this message and its attachments._ FROM: <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Amy Bivins <amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org>> REPLY-TO: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>> DATE: Tuesday, August 1, 2017 at 12:32 PM TO: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>> SUBJECT: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Updates, action items following 1 August PP IRT call Dear Colleagues, Thanks so much for your active participation on today’s Privacy/Proxy IRT call. We made a lot of progress. If you were unable to attend, the recording and materials are available on the wiki, https://community.icann.org/display/IRT/01+August+2017. I’ve updated the issues list (attached) for the topics discussed today (Issues 5, 6, 9, 10, 13) based on your feedback. IRT ACTION ITEMS * Please provide any additional input you have on issues 5, 6, 9, 10, and 13 NO LATER THAN NEXT MONDAY, 7 AUGUST. In particular, please consider the following questions that arose during today’s meeting: * Regarding issue 6 (Section 3.5.4.1 of the draft PPAA), should we consider reducing the required period from 15 days to some shortened period? If yes, do you have recommendations for what the shortened time period should be? * Regarding issue 13 (PPAA section 5.7.1): (i) Is it feasible for a registrar to block new registrations from a suspended provider (provided that provider is identified by its ICANN ID during the registration process)? (IRT input on this point has been mixed); (ii) If the answer to (i) is yes, is any additional language required with respect to Point 5 raised during the call (“sounds like we need an EPP for PP Providers”)? * Please complete the IRT poll re: data escrow and additional PPAA discussion topics no later than Friday, 4 August, https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/62XCMSS NEXT WEEK Next week, we plan to discuss Issues 4 and 23(data retention), 12 (accreditation term), 15 (Customer Data Accuracy Spec), 17-19 (LEA Specification). We will discuss data retention and the LEA specification first, to ensure we can discuss both of these while we have our PSWG colleagues on the call. Thanks in advance for your continued consideration of the issues discussed today and your completion of the poll. If you have questions or comments before our next meeting, please send them to the list. Best, Amy AMY E. BIVINS Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org> www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org> [1] Links: ------ [1] http://www.icann.org _______________________________________________ Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl _______________________________________________ Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl _______________________________________________ Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl

Thanks, Vicky! I made a note of that in the tracker and, unless there’s any significant opposition to that among the group, I’ll be sure that update is made for the next draft. From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Victoria Sheckler Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 5:10 PM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Updates, action items following 1 August PP IRT call Note the language at the end needs to be revised along the lines of the RAA, as I think was tentatively agreed on the last call. -Vicky From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Darcy Southwell Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 3:20 PM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Updates, action items following 1 August PP IRT call I support Sara’s proposed language. From: <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Amy Bivins <amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org>> Reply-To: <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>> Date: Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 6:22 AM To: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Updates, action items following 1 August PP IRT call Thanks, Sara! What do others think of this proposed language? -----Original Message----- From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of gtheo Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 3:27 AM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Updates, action items following 1 August PP IRT call I like that language, Sara. Thanks, Theo Sara Bockey schreef op 2017-08-02 11:33 PM: Hi All, Regarding Section 3.5.4.1, what if we used language that provided some flexibility regarding the time frame? For example: A Customer's willful provision of inaccurate or unreliable information, its willful failure to update information provided to Provider within seven (7) days of any change, OR ITS FAILURE TO RESPOND TO PROVIDER INQUIRIES WITHIN THE TIME FRAME REQUIRED BY PROVIDER’S TOS (NOT TO EXCEED (15) DAYS) concerning the accuracy of contact details associated with the Registered Name for which Provider is providing the Services constitute a material breach of the service agreement between such Customer and Provider and be a basis for suspension or cancellation of the Services. Sara SARA BOCKEY POLICY MANAGER | GODADDY™ SBOCKEY@GODADDY.COM<mailto:SBOCKEY@GODADDY.COM> 480-366-3616 SKYPE: SBOCKEY _This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential information. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy of this message and its attachments._ FROM: <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Amy Bivins <amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org>> REPLY-TO: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>> DATE: Tuesday, August 1, 2017 at 12:32 PM TO: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>> SUBJECT: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Updates, action items following 1 August PP IRT call Dear Colleagues, Thanks so much for your active participation on today’s Privacy/Proxy IRT call. We made a lot of progress. If you were unable to attend, the recording and materials are available on the wiki, https://community.icann.org/display/IRT/01+August+2017. I’ve updated the issues list (attached) for the topics discussed today (Issues 5, 6, 9, 10, 13) based on your feedback. IRT ACTION ITEMS * Please provide any additional input you have on issues 5, 6, 9, 10, and 13 NO LATER THAN NEXT MONDAY, 7 AUGUST. In particular, please consider the following questions that arose during today’s meeting: * Regarding issue 6 (Section 3.5.4.1 of the draft PPAA), should we consider reducing the required period from 15 days to some shortened period? If yes, do you have recommendations for what the shortened time period should be? * Regarding issue 13 (PPAA section 5.7.1): (i) Is it feasible for a registrar to block new registrations from a suspended provider (provided that provider is identified by its ICANN ID during the registration process)? (IRT input on this point has been mixed); (ii) If the answer to (i) is yes, is any additional language required with respect to Point 5 raised during the call (“sounds like we need an EPP for PP Providers”)? * Please complete the IRT poll re: data escrow and additional PPAA discussion topics no later than Friday, 4 August, https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/62XCMSS NEXT WEEK Next week, we plan to discuss Issues 4 and 23(data retention), 12 (accreditation term), 15 (Customer Data Accuracy Spec), 17-19 (LEA Specification). We will discuss data retention and the LEA specification first, to ensure we can discuss both of these while we have our PSWG colleagues on the call. Thanks in advance for your continued consideration of the issues discussed today and your completion of the poll. If you have questions or comments before our next meeting, please send them to the list. Best, Amy AMY E. BIVINS Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org> www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org> [1] Links: ------ [1] http://www.icann.org _______________________________________________ Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl _______________________________________________ Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl _______________________________________________ Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl

Hi Eric (and all), Thanks for this! Does anyone else have comments on these points? I’m adding these to the tracker and will distribute the updated file after our call tomorrow. With respect to your second point on 5.7.1, the goal of this provision (regarding provider suspension) would be to suspend the provider’s authorization to offer new PP services, specifically, during the suspension period (as a step short of termination, if the Provider is working with ICANN compliance to resolve a Compliance issue). This suspension would include a prohibition on providing PP services for new domain name registrations (the provider could continue providing services for existing names for existing customers) or adding a new PP service to an existing registration that didn’t previous have the PP service. Is that what you were asking—if I misunderstood your question could you please expand on it? Thanks! Amy From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Eric Rokobauer Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 3:00 PM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Updates, action items following 1 August PP IRT call ​Hello all, Some feedback for the items discussed in this thread. 3.5.4.1 - I support Sara's suggested language​. 5.7.1 - Blocking new registrations will present technical challenges and still just not sure how we can achieve it (whether affiliated with an ICANN ID or not). ​And maybe something to keep in mind - ​t hose applying ​are doing so in order to​ obtain the right to provide ​privacy/proxy as a service ​. ​ ​ ​And if those providers ​ were to be in violation ​, they ​ could lose their right to ​ offering that service. D o we intend for it to also mean they lose the right to ​doing ​ ​ registrations ​ also​ ​? Having this section feels like it would suggest that.​ ​Regards, Eric​ On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Amy Bivins <amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org>> wrote: Dear Colleagues, Thanks so much for your active participation on today’s Privacy/Proxy IRT call. We made a lot of progress. If you were unable to attend, the recording and materials are available on the wiki, https://community.icann.org/display/IRT/01+August+2017. I’ve updated the issues list (attached) for the topics discussed today (Issues 5, 6, 9, 10, 13) based on your feedback. IRT Action Items 1. Please provide any additional input you have on issues 5, 6, 9, 10, and 13 no later than next Monday, 7 August. In particular, please consider the following questions that arose during today’s meeting: * Regarding issue 6 (Section 3.5.4.1 of the draft PPAA), should we consider reducing the required period from 15 days to some shortened period? If yes, do you have recommendations for what the shortened time period should be? * Regarding issue 13 (PPAA section 5.7.1): (i) Is it feasible for a registrar to block new registrations from a suspended provider (provided that provider is identified by its ICANN ID during the registration process)? (IRT input on this point has been mixed); (ii) If the answer to (i) is yes, is any additional language required with respect to Point 5 raised during the call (“sounds like we need an EPP for PP Providers”)? 1. Please complete the IRT poll re: data escrow and additional PPAA discussion topics no later than Friday, 4 August, https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/62XCMSS Next Week Next week, we plan to discuss Issues 4 and 23(data retention), 12 (accreditation term), 15 (Customer Data Accuracy Spec), 17-19 (LEA Specification). We will discuss data retention and the LEA specification first, to ensure we can discuss both of these while we have our PSWG colleagues on the call. Thanks in advance for your continued consideration of the issues discussed today and your completion of the poll. If you have questions or comments before our next meeting, please send them to the list. Best, Amy Amy E. Bivins Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551<tel:(202)%20249-7551> Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104<tel:(202)%20789-0104> Email: amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org> www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org> _______________________________________________ Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl