Thanks Julie, there’s one typo under Wheras 11 (submitted), no more change from my side. Thanks to all for the evaluation and your thoughts re the survey and the lack of interest in the job shown. Besides the information provided through the survey I personally could get some knowledge of James and his understanding of IANA. I was on the CWG list where he was actively engaged, and I’m sure about he understande the material. I was thinking about the reasons that just one candidate showed up. It’s not communications – a lot was done on various lists as well as in Helsinki. Maybe it’s the timing and time pressure. The very specialized character of the IANA tasks may also be a point hampering those who are not so familiar with. Time commitment was an issue I heard from someone who was principally interested. Looking forward to the council meeting Wolf-Ulrich From: Julie Hedlund Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 1:16 AM To: gnso-csc@icann.org ; WUKnoben Subject: Draft Amended Motion: GNSO CSC Liaison Candidates Dear Wolf-Ulrich Knoben and CSC members, Please see the attached draft amended motion based on the assumption that James Gannon is the only liaison candidate to be submitted to the GNSO Council. I will be happy to make any changes you suggest. Thanks so much for your assistance. Kind regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director