Hello Michael, Thank you for pointing this out! It should be Q4 instead. A draft question was removed but the question number wasn't updated. Now it is fixed. Best Regards, Ariel On 4/13/22, 2:11 AM, "Michael Bauland" <Michael.Bauland@knipp.de> wrote: Hi Ariel, thanks for the draft survey. I can't seem to add comments to the survey, so I'll just write my comment to the list (though it'd be more convenient if we could comment directly). In Q1 you write: [IF ANSWER IS NO, PROCEED TO Q5] [IF ANSWER IS DON’T KNOW / NOT SURE, PROCEED TO Q5] However, there does not seem to be a Q5 if I haven't missed it. Or is this the standard way to denote that the questionnaire ends in this case? Or maybe you wanted to put "PROCEED TO Q4" instead. After all, I think it makes sense to ask the question "What factors may affect your decision to request activating allocatable variant label(s)?" also to those people that answered "no" or "don't know" to the first question. Cheers, Michael -- ____________________________________________________________________ | | | knipp | Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH ------- Technologiepark Martin-Schmeisser-Weg 9 44227 Dortmund Germany Dipl.-Informatiker Fon: +49 231 9703-0 Fax: +49 231 9703-200 Dr. Michael Bauland SIP: Michael.Bauland@knipp.de Software Development E-mail: Michael.Bauland@knipp.de Register Court: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRB 13728 Chief Executive Officers: Dietmar Knipp, Elmar Knipp