Public Comment review and Thursday meeting agenda
Hi Everyone: Welcome back. During the break, you will see that the Support Team has worked through and summarized the comments to the Initial Report using the standard format. We have also identified an approach to the public comment review that is outlined in the attached document. It includes prep materials for this Thursday’s meeting - and identifies the path for the next few meetings after that. Please read and consider it carefully, provide any guidance you might have, and prepare for the Thursday meeting. Let us know if you have questions or comments. Best regards, Kurt & Rafik
Thanks Kurt, One small comment. On the PCRT, in the "Section" column, for those of us who have not memorized the entire report, it would be useful to have some sort of capsule description. For example: Purpose 2: Maintain SSR of DNS Purpose 6: Dispute policies Recommendation 3: Current accuracy policies Alan At 01/01/2019 10:49 PM, Kurt Pritz wrote: Hi Everyone: Welcome back. During the break, you will see that the Support Team has worked through and summarized the comments to the Initial Report using the standard format. We have also identified an approach to the public comment review that is outlined in the attached document. It includes prep materials for this Thursday’s meeting - and identifies the path for the next few meetings after that. Please read and consider it carefully, provide any guidance you might have, and prepare for the Thursday meeting. Let us know if you have questions or comments. Best regards, Kurt & Rafik _______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
Dear Kurt The arrangement is not user's friendly. One need to refer to too many sources I do not know why in ICANN the process is so difficult. Perhaps it is make so not to make it possible with average familiarity to follow the case I have been involved in conferences and meetings that for more than 1300 pages are proposals from hundreds of sources The most simple manner used since decades to prepare a consolidated workd document starting with the initial text of each subject and below that the individual comments with Agreed Agreed with comment on red line Disagreed totally but no suggestion Disagreed but providing new text That has worked more than sufficient I do not understand why the things are made complex Regards Kavouss On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 5:51 AM Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
Thanks Kurt,
One small comment. On the PCRT, in the "Section" column, for those of us who have not memorized the entire report, it would be useful to have some sort of capsule description.
For example:
Purpose 2: Maintain SSR of DNS Purpose 6: Dispute policies Recommendation 3: Current accuracy policies
Alan
At 01/01/2019 10:49 PM, Kurt Pritz wrote:
Hi Everyone:
Welcome back.
During the break, you will see that the Support Team has worked through and summarized the comments to the Initial Report using the standard format. We have also identified an approach to the public comment review that is outlined in the attached document. It includes prep materials for this Thursday’s meeting - and identifies the path for the next few meetings after that.
Please read and consider it carefully, provide any guidance you might have, and prepare for the Thursday meeting.
Let us know if you have questions or comments.
Best regards,
Kurt & Rafik _______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
_______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
Thanks, Alan, for that suggestion. This has been updated accordingly (see https://community.icann.org/x/U4cWBg). Best regards and best wishes for 2019! Caitlin, Berry and Marika From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> Date: Wednesday, January 2, 2019 at 05:51 To: Kurt Pritz <kurt@kjpritz.com>, GNSO EPDP <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] Public Comment review and Thursday meeting agenda Thanks Kurt, One small comment. On the PCRT, in the "Section" column, for those of us who have not memorized the entire report, it would be useful to have some sort of capsule description. For example: Purpose 2: Maintain SSR of DNS Purpose 6: Dispute policies Recommendation 3: Current accuracy policies Alan At 01/01/2019 10:49 PM, Kurt Pritz wrote: Hi Everyone: Welcome back. During the break, you will see that the Support Team has worked through and summarized the comments to the Initial Report using the standard format. We have also identified an approach to the public comment review that is outlined in the attached document. It includes prep materials for this Thursday’s meeting - and identifies the path for the next few meetings after that. Please read and consider it carefully, provide any guidance you might have, and prepare for the Thursday meeting. Let us know if you have questions or comments. Best regards, Kurt & Rafik _______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
Great. Thanks. Alan -- Sent from my mobile. Please excuse brevity and typos. On January 2, 2019 5:41:27 AM EST, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> wrote: Thanks, Alan, for that suggestion. This has been updated accordingly (see https://community.icann.org/x/U4cWBg). Best regards and best wishes for 2019! Caitlin, Berry and Marika From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> Date: Wednesday, January 2, 2019 at 05:51 To: Kurt Pritz <kurt@kjpritz.com>, GNSO EPDP <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] Public Comment review and Thursday meeting agenda Thanks Kurt, One small comment. On the PCRT, in the "Section" column, for those of us who have not memorized the entire report, it would be useful to have some sort of capsule description. For example: Purpose 2: Maintain SSR of DNS Purpose 6: Dispute policies Recommendation 3: Current accuracy policies Alan At 01/01/2019 10:49 PM, Kurt Pritz wrote: Hi Everyone: Welcome back. During the break, you will see that the Support Team has worked through and summarized the comments to the Initial Report using the standard format. We have also identified an approach to the public comment review that is outlined in the attached document. It includes prep materials for this Thursday’s meeting - and identifies the path for the next few meetings after that. Please read and consider it carefully, provide any guidance you might have, and prepare for the Thursday meeting. Let us know if you have questions or comments. Best regards, Kurt & Rafik _______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
Dear All, I did inform you how other organization prepare consolidated documents for discussion. Pls find attached an example of such process In recent ITU Plenipotentiary Conference we have deals with 209 Resolutions and 13 Decision among which I am sending you an example for Resolution 130; Cyber security It is a simple process,. no tools , no special procédure very easy and user's friendly Regards Kavouss On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 5:12 PM Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
Great. Thanks. Alan -- Sent from my mobile. Please excuse brevity and typos.
On January 2, 2019 5:41:27 AM EST, Marika Konings < marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:
Thanks, Alan, for that suggestion. This has been updated accordingly (see https://community.icann.org/x/U4cWBg).
Best regards and best wishes for 2019!
Caitlin, Berry and Marika
*From: *Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> *Date: *Wednesday, January 2, 2019 at 05:51 *To: *Kurt Pritz <kurt@kjpritz.com>, GNSO EPDP <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> *Subject: *Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] Public Comment review and Thursday meeting agenda
Thanks Kurt,
One small comment. On the PCRT, in the "Section" column, for those of us who have not memorized the entire report, it would be useful to have some sort of capsule description.
For example:
Purpose 2: Maintain SSR of DNS Purpose 6: Dispute policies Recommendation 3: Current accuracy policies
Alan
At 01/01/2019 10:49 PM, Kurt Pritz wrote:
Hi Everyone:
Welcome back.
During the break, you will see that the Support Team has worked through and summarized the comments to the Initial Report using the standard format. We have also identified an approach to the public comment review that is outlined in the attached document. It includes prep materials for this Thursday’s meeting - and identifies the path for the next few meetings after that.
Please read and consider it carefully, provide any guidance you might have, and prepare for the Thursday meeting.
Let us know if you have questions or comments.
Best regards,
Kurt & Rafik _______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
_______________________________________________
Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
participants (4)
-
Alan Greenberg -
Kavouss Arasteh -
Kurt Pritz -
Marika Konings