April 2017 - Gnso-igo-ingo-crp

MP3, Attendance & AC Chat for IGO-INGO CRP PDP WG call on Thursday, 06 April 2017
by Terri Agnew April 6, 2017

April 6, 2017

Dear All, Please find the attendance and MP3 recording along with the AC recording below for the IGO-INGO Curative Rights Protection PDP WG Meeting held on Thursday, 06 April 2017 at 16:00 UTC. Mp3: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-igo-ingo-crp-pdp-06apr17-en.mp3 AC Recording: <https://participate.icann.org/p7xck5bcvss/?OWASP_CSRFTOKEN=e3a2073779853843 886d55424ea456ee1ea5baaa166576b62ea40857bdfd81ad> https://participate.icann.org/p7xck5bcvss/ <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__audio.icann.org_gnso_gn so-2Dcrp-2Dpdp-2D13oct16-2Den.mp3&d=DQMF-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6s Jms7xcl4I5cM&r=8_WhWIPqsLT6TmF1Zmyci866vcPSFO4VShFqESGe_5iHWGlBLwwwehFBfjrsj Wv9&m=asM5JoG30Yqf49-Nims9k3McNfFtmzlAe1HmuXI6wic&s=0nZvoU1RqsjvPcNWDN_a2vVZ Dp9uXeyGO8NN2dN5h74&e=> On page: https://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_group -2Dactivities_calendar-23nov&d=DQMF-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7x cl4I5cM&r=8_WhWIPqsLT6TmF1Zmyci866vcPSFO4VShFqESGe_5iHWGlBLwwwehFBfjrsjWv9&m =wBBn3Ar2_mvUeGcM8rpOAyluUFEJFG5lASQ-cAccI2k&s=3BfiwO43tzwlrIbIyBY4Q-14zsFQC X518fLLR8GWR7I&e=> http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar Attendees: David Maher - RySG George Kirikos - Individual Jay Chapman - Individual Paul Tattersfield - Individual Petter Rindforth - IPC (co-chair) Phil Corwin - BC (co-chair) Mason Cole - RySG Apologies: Osvaldo Novoa - ISPCP ICANN staff: Mary Wong Steve Chan Dennis Chang Terri Agnew ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/ Wiki Agenda page: https://community.icann.org/x/NMfRAw Thank you. Kind regards, Terri ------------------------------- Adobe Connect chat transcript for Thursday, 06 April 2017 Michelle DeSmyter:Dear All, Welcome to the IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms Working Group call on Thursday, 06 April 2017 at 16:00 UTC. Michelle DeSmyter:Meeting wiki page: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_N MfRAw <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_ NMfRAw&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpC IgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=TzrUf25YGuntVxSRK1aTNWz9K32sPy9MfC9E04T3y5 E&s=qO2QdwRLXEhp5AVUwlbKIZB_4R7P4wt8_OLc-hi7qMI&e> &d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXh FzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=TzrUf25YGuntVxSRK1aTNWz9K32sPy9MfC9E04T3y5E&s=qO 2QdwRLXEhp5AVUwlbKIZB_4R7P4wt8_OLc-hi7qMI&e= George Kirikos:Hi folks. Steve Chan:Hi George, welcome George Kirikos:Hey Steve. How's it going? Steve Chan:All is well! I've got oatmeal and an IGO/INGO CRP meeting. George Kirikos:Yummy! George Kirikos:Welcome Petter. Petter Rindforth:The same! George Kirikos:First come, first served! :-) George Kirikos:If there was a Sunrise period for chairing, Petter would win. Paul Tattersfield:Hi Guys George Kirikos:Hey Paul. George Kirikos:Did the 90 minute meeting kill participation? Mary Wong:@Phil, @Petter - do you think we have quorum? Paul Tattersfield:I think its the weather it looks beautiful outsde here George George Kirikos:5 is a bit low. George Kirikos:Perhaps 8 would be a better number? George Kirikos:6. Mary Wong:OK, we will make sure to remind all WG members via the mailing list to review the recording, transcript and documents from today. George Kirikos:There's a bit of crackling on the line -- is that just me? Mary Wong:@George, I hear it too George Kirikos:It's hurting my brain. George Kirikos:GAC letter is at: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.icann.org_lists_c omments-2Digo-2Dingo-2Dcrp-2Daccess-2Dinitial-2D20jan17_msg00023.html <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.icann.org_lists_ comments-2Digo-2Dingo-2Dcrp-2Daccess-2Dinitial-2D20jan17_msg00023.html&d=DwI FaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar 9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=TzrUf25YGuntVxSRK1aTNWz9K32sPy9MfC9E04T3y5E&s=klnQZMDD ErwnvDa77GXHnk2H-8eIrJoKfZayzNJ51Ss&e> &d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXh FzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=TzrUf25YGuntVxSRK1aTNWz9K32sPy9MfC9E04T3y5E&s=kl nQZMDDErwnvDa77GXHnk2H-8eIrJoKfZayzNJ51Ss&e= for those who want to read it outside the Adobe. Terri Agnew:Welcome Mason Cole Jay Chapman:I agree with you, Phil Jay Chapman:and Petter Mason Cole:Thanks Terri, sorry to be late. George Kirikos:Hi Mason. Mary Wong:We have the full comments from GAC, USG, OECD and WIPO ready to upload as well as the staff table and the slides from Copenhagen (which excerpts the GAC, USG, OECD and WIPO comments by recommendation). Just let us know which you'd like to see on screen. George Kirikos:Did we ever hear back from the IGOs re: further participation by them, as we conclude our work? George Kirikos:(i.e. we did try outreach, and it was suggested we continue that outreach) Mason Cole:To my memory, yes. George Kirikos:Disagree with that characterization by the GAC. It's just a more well-researched insight into standing, more than any individual UDRP/URS panelist could ever do, that is *consistent* with common law rights. George Kirikos:(and thus consistent with the UDRP, not an alteration of the UDRP) George Kirikos:You can't always get what you want But if you try sometimes you just might find You just might find You get what you need :-) Paul Tattersfield:Domain Name System should accommodate legitimate third-party co-existence is a new and important principle George Kirikos:There are other entities "most affected", i.e. registrants. Mary Wong:Shall we move to the USG comment? George Kirikos:WIPO's was shorter. George Kirikos:USG comment is at: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.icann.org_lists_c omments-2Digo-2Dingo-2Dcrp-2Daccess-2Dinitial-2D20jan17_msg00013.html <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.icann.org_lists_ comments-2Digo-2Dingo-2Dcrp-2Daccess-2Dinitial-2D20jan17_msg00013.html&d=DwI FaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar 9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=TzrUf25YGuntVxSRK1aTNWz9K32sPy9MfC9E04T3y5E&s=w-LgOchk aWP0uWQCkSQlRxsHRPLWxJR-CKiNSSSKpMA&e> &d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXh FzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=TzrUf25YGuntVxSRK1aTNWz9K32sPy9MfC9E04T3y5E&s=w- LgOchkaWP0uWQCkSQlRxsHRPLWxJR-CKiNSSSKpMA&e= Mary Wong:Sorry for the delay, the wrong document had been uploaded previously! Paul Tattersfield:One after thought on the GAC comments I think we should make note of the GAC's comments that Domain Name System should accommodate legitimate third-party co-existence is a new and important principle George Kirikos:+1 Paul George Kirikos:It's informative that they concede that is not even a consensus on Article 6ter's interpretation amongst themselves. George Kirikos:*that there George Kirikos:Would love to know the list of "fake IGOs". George Kirikos:I wonder if they're objecting to some countries that have entries in the Article 6ter DB? George Kirikos:(i.e. they're countries, but not IGOs?) George Kirikos:e.g. a state emblem for "Canada" https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.wipo.int_cgi-2D6te_i fetch5-3FENG-2BSIXTER-2B15-2D00-2B11520870-2DKEY-2B256-2B0-2B154-2BF-2DENG-2 B2-2B2-2B1-2B25-2BSEP-2D0_HITNUM-2CB-2Bcanada <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.wipo.int_cgi-2D6te_ ifetch5-3FENG-2BSIXTER-2B15-2D00-2B11520870-2DKEY-2B256-2B0-2B154-2BF-2DENG- 2B2-2B2-2B1-2B25-2BSEP-2D0_HITNUM-2CB-2Bcanada&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3 mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=Tz rUf25YGuntVxSRK1aTNWz9K32sPy9MfC9E04T3y5E&s=cAf-UV-C3kz4N2upK6PKTP_yOER-bgbV UoEEyFvl6eQ&e> &d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXh FzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=TzrUf25YGuntVxSRK1aTNWz9K32sPy9MfC9E04T3y5E&s=cA f-UV-C3kz4N2upK6PKTP_yOER-bgbVUoEEyFvl6eQ&e= George Kirikos:We can hear you. George Kirikos:Right, evidence of common law rights is what we've suggested all along, isn't it? George Kirikos:(strong evidence, even) Philip Corwin:IMHO, letting 6ter notification be used as evidence of common law TM rights would not convert it that notification in establishing a right. Mary Wong:@Phil, thanks - as mentioned, staff isn't advocating either way, just noting the need to flesh this out further in discussion George Kirikos:Are we done with the USG? George Kirikos:OECD is at: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.icann.org_lists_c omments-2Digo-2Dingo-2Dcrp-2Daccess-2Dinitial-2D20jan17_msg00002.html <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.icann.org_lists_ comments-2Digo-2Dingo-2Dcrp-2Daccess-2Dinitial-2D20jan17_msg00002.html&d=DwI FaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar 9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=TzrUf25YGuntVxSRK1aTNWz9K32sPy9MfC9E04T3y5E&s=s4VbfpdV afJEabO6DByN92-nr1ajD-QbM3Sj8cTVy48&e> &d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXh FzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=TzrUf25YGuntVxSRK1aTNWz9K32sPy9MfC9E04T3y5E&s=s4 VbfpdVafJEabO6DByN92-nr1ajD-QbM3Sj8cTVy48&e= George Kirikos:Yes, they're happy with Article 6ter. George Kirikos:Since Article 6ter list is mostly a superset of the IGO small group standing. Mary Wong:I suppose 6ter is international law, so that's the agreement? George Kirikos:That's hilarious, see: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.wipo.int_article6ter _en_legal-5Ftexts_article-5F6ter.html <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.wipo.int_article6te r_en_legal-5Ftexts_article-5F6ter.html&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkb PSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=TzrUf25YGu ntVxSRK1aTNWz9K32sPy9MfC9E04T3y5E&s=nCthNZWR9pmjZf6X6MHirkzWNj-uGM5qOjGp4hDl kCo&e> &d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXh FzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=TzrUf25YGuntVxSRK1aTNWz9K32sPy9MfC9E04T3y5E&s=nC thNZWR9pmjZf6X6MHirkzWNj-uGM5qOjGp4hDlkCo&e= George Kirikos:They can't cherry pick the parts of the treaty they like. George Kirikos:It's not really new. But, it's not a major issue. The question is whether you can *compel* someone to agree to arbitration. George Kirikos:WIPO's comments at: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.icann.org_lists_c omments-2Digo-2Dingo-2Dcrp-2Daccess-2Dinitial-2D20jan17_msg00000.html <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.icann.org_lists_ comments-2Digo-2Dingo-2Dcrp-2Daccess-2Dinitial-2D20jan17_msg00000.html&d=DwI FaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar 9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=TzrUf25YGuntVxSRK1aTNWz9K32sPy9MfC9E04T3y5E&s=LevahhO4 U-qkvy8aMPfHJ41sfm2KZlBCI_ab3qqMp8Y&e> &d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXh FzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=TzrUf25YGuntVxSRK1aTNWz9K32sPy9MfC9E04T3y5E&s=Le vahhO4U-qkvy8aMPfHJ41sfm2KZlBCI_ab3qqMp8Y&e= George Kirikos:Maybe we should peruse Mary's summary document, too, to get familiar with it, before we dig into other comments later? George Kirikos:Paul had a good comment re: the NY Times article WIPO mentioned. Mary Wong:@George, it's Mary & Steve's joint production (but I take responsibility for the awful formatting due to a bad initial template)! George Kirikos:See Paul's comment at: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.icann.org_lists_c omments-2Digo-2Dingo-2Dcrp-2Daccess-2Dinitial-2D20jan17_msg00038.html <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.icann.org_lists_ comments-2Digo-2Dingo-2Dcrp-2Daccess-2Dinitial-2D20jan17_msg00038.html&d=DwI FaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar 9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=TzrUf25YGuntVxSRK1aTNWz9K32sPy9MfC9E04T3y5E&s=Rk_Btgk5 1vzuXd_VdDQ7DL7vOeWpEr4O9_z07E8TmIk&e> &d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXh FzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=TzrUf25YGuntVxSRK1aTNWz9K32sPy9MfC9E04T3y5E&s=Rk _Btgk51vzuXd_VdDQ7DL7vOeWpEr4O9_z07E8TmIk&e= George Kirikos:Desire, not need. George Kirikos:It was a pretty weak letter, compared to the OECD one. Paul Tattersfield:recognition of co-existence principles is new from WIPO George Kirikos:Probably WIPO is the organizer of the IGOs' efforts, so they defer to them, rather than engaging in independent analysis. George Kirikos:There was something new in the footnote on page 2, suggesting that there was "capture" by [registration] parties. George Kirikos:Which is odd, coming from a group that negotiated secretly with the GAC. Paul Tattersfield:Thanks Mary that would be helpful George Kirikos:NAF didn't file anything. Mary Wong:When our group comes to discuss the separate DRP point, it may be useful to engage with the providers at that point, including NAF. George Kirikos:I lost my connection. George Kirikos:Calling back. Terri Agnew:@George, also alerting op George Kirikos:I'm back. Terri Agnew:welcome back George George Kirikos:Can I finish my earlier comment? George Kirikos:(I got cut off) George Kirikos:lol Paul Tattersfield:naughty George Kirikos:Which https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.icann.org_lists_c omments-2Digo-2Dingo-2Dcrp-2Daccess-2Dinitial-2D20jan17_ <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.icann.org_lists_ comments-2Digo-2Dingo-2Dcrp-2Daccess-2Dinitial-2D20jan17_&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3P Jp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4 xR2EBk&m=TzrUf25YGuntVxSRK1aTNWz9K32sPy9MfC9E04T3y5E&s=cfWwc3-J2AInCH8-HDccz om_iOQajyG2PLfnZU-J75g&e> &d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXh FzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=TzrUf25YGuntVxSRK1aTNWz9K32sPy9MfC9E04T3y5E&s=cf Wwc3-J2AInCH8-HDcczom_iOQajyG2PLfnZU-J75g&e= George Kirikos:MIGA is also World Bank. George Kirikos:Wait a sec? There's another World Bank comment too: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.icann.org_lists_c omments-2Digo-2Dingo-2Dcrp-2Daccess-2Dinitial-2D20jan17_msg00033.html <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.icann.org_lists_ comments-2Digo-2Dingo-2Dcrp-2Daccess-2Dinitial-2D20jan17_msg00033.html&d=DwI FaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar 9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=TzrUf25YGuntVxSRK1aTNWz9K32sPy9MfC9E04T3y5E&s=oPRpFaFX xUk0snkDvWT7DJq6G073sTXI1J-rXuJP5eI&e> &d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXh FzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=TzrUf25YGuntVxSRK1aTNWz9K32sPy9MfC9E04T3y5E&s=oP RpFaFXxUk0snkDvWT7DJq6G073sTXI1J-rXuJP5eI&e= George Kirikos:Oops, I guess that's the same comment. Mary Wong:@George, MIGA is an agency of the World Bank. George Kirikos:Right, Mary. George Kirikos:So we're looking at: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.icann.org_lists_c omments-2Digo-2Dingo-2Dcrp-2Daccess-2Dinitial-2D20jan17_msg00033.html <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.icann.org_lists_ comments-2Digo-2Dingo-2Dcrp-2Daccess-2Dinitial-2D20jan17_msg00033.html&d=DwI FaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar 9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=TzrUf25YGuntVxSRK1aTNWz9K32sPy9MfC9E04T3y5E&s=oPRpFaFX xUk0snkDvWT7DJq6G073sTXI1J-rXuJP5eI&e> &d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXh FzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=TzrUf25YGuntVxSRK1aTNWz9K32sPy9MfC9E04T3y5E&s=oP RpFaFXxUk0snkDvWT7DJq6G073sTXI1J-rXuJP5eI&e= Mary Wong:Yes, I believe so. George Kirikos:It's an odd comment, given that the World Bank actually USED the UDRP successfullly. Mary Wong:It may be a misunderstanding of our recommendation about 6ter? George Kirikos:It may even be a misunderstanding of the UDRP itself, Mary, as Petter mentioned. George Kirikos:Lack of institutional memory, given World Bank used the UDRP and won. George Kirikos:(probably from someone new, who wasn't aware of the World Bank's past UDRP success) Petter Rindforth:Rather a misunderstanding of the UDRP. Local protection is only needed for ccDRPs George Kirikos:"The World Bank admits that the privileges and immunities of IGOs are not a simple topic." LOL About deference to IGOs. Mary Wong:@Phil, that is correct (re Board request to the GNSO on Small Group Proposal) George Kirikos:They seem unfamiliar with the multistakeholder process. George Kirikos:Assignment has already worked. George Kirikos:UNITAID case. George Kirikos:"For one thing, the assignment may well be rejected by the UDRP or a court." FALSE, given it has already worked. Mary Wong:@Phil, staff presumes they were talking about waiving immunity when responding to a UDRP complaint filed by someone else George Kirikos:+1 Phil. George Kirikos:Legal principles are robust enough to handle new technology. George Kirikos:Staff Table is also at: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/attachments/20170405/2235865 2/PublicCommentReviewTool-InitialReport-4April2017-0001.pdf Mary Wong:Yes and yes, Phil George Kirikos:Very productive call today! Paul Tattersfield:Agree George George Kirikos:Well done by Phil and Petter on keeping us on track. Petter Rindforth:It's possible thanks to Staff and active WG members George Kirikos:Maybe we should move the NOTES in Adobe to the left, so we can have a wider area for the document next week? George Kirikos:(since the tables are so wide) George Kirikos:(i.e. to rearrange the pods) Mary Wong:@George, we'll see what IT will allow us to do George Kirikos:Oh, ok. I thought that it was something that staff had control over, easily. (not sure what your interface is) Jay Chapman:Agree - excellent progress Mary Wong:@George, we have this thing about consistency of tools across the org :) George Kirikos:Bye everyone! Jay Chapman:thanks, all Paul Tattersfield:thanks all bye Mary Wong:Thanks everybody!

1 0

Initial draft for review: Public Comment Review Tool
by Mary Wong April 6, 2017

April 6, 2017

Dear Working Group members, Please find attached an initial draft of the tabular Public Comment Review Tool that was mentioned on our last call. This is basically a tabular summary prepared by staff of all the public comments received on our Initial Report, organized according to Recommendation number corresponding to the specific recommendation in the Report (with additional sections for General and Other Comments). As the document is rather long, we attach the PDF format here but please let me know if you’d prefer to receive the Word version – staff will also post them to the Working Group wiki space. Some numbers that may be of interest: · We received a total of 46 comments (including several from one individual commentator (Mr Richard Hill, who participated in the Working Group’s open session at ICANN58), a few individual Working Group members, one ICANN Advisory Committee (GAC) and four GNSO Stakeholder Groups/Constituencies (the Registries and Registrars Stakeholder Groups, the Business Constituency and the Intellectual Property Constituency). · Well over a dozen IGOs submitted comments, and a substantial number also signed on to the comments submitted by WIPO (10) and the OECD (15). Please also note the following caveats regarding the attached table: · This table was prepared to assist with your review of the comments received but does not replace or supersede the actual reading of the complete comments. · Where we judged it to be helpful, we have excerpted specific text from a comment in the table for clarity or context, and also provided a link to the specific comment so that you can read it in full. · In some excerpts, we have shortened or summarized certain language in the comment – this is indicated by square brackets around the relevant word or phrase. · As we are dealing with a relatively new format (typically, staff prepares a similar table for all PDP Working Groups), some of the formatting came out strangely. We will try to fix these problems, but in the interests of time we thought it best to get this rough version out to you as soon as we could. Finally, as noted on the Working Group call last week, for this Thursday we will plan on meeting for 90 minutes, and, following a brief opportunity to close out on the GAC’s comments (continued from last week), we will proceed to discuss the comments that were received from the OECD, WIPO and the US Government. You can find these comments here: · WIPO - https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-igo-ingo-crp-access-initial-20jan17/… · OECD - https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-igo-ingo-crp-access-initial-20jan17/… · US Government - https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-igo-ingo-crp-access-initial-20jan17/… Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director & Special Adviser for Strategic Policy Planning Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org Telephone: +1-603-5744889

2 2

Message from the Co-Chairs
by Phil Corwin April 6, 2017

April 6, 2017

Dear WG Members: As we enter the phase of reviewing comments on our Initial report and Recommendations, the Co-Chairs wish to share their views as to how this WG should proceed to best ensure that our final work proceeds in an expeditious and comprehensive fashion. Subject to acceptance by the WG members, we propose the following--- * All WG sessions will be of 90 minutes' duration until further notice in order to best facilitate our goal of delivering a Final Report in advance of the ICANN 59 meeting taking place in Johannesburg in late June (we envision that the comment period will likely still be open during that meeting, and that a meeting session(s) can be utilized to explain and answer questions about that Report). * All comments having original content will receive an initial review (comments that simply endorse the filing of another party will not be reviewed, but that support will be noted in staff prepared documents summarizing the content of all comments). That initial review will not include substantive debate as to whether a comment requires some adjustment of our Initial Report. Rather, we will note all new material and/or arguments contained in all comments, and then will consolidate all duplicative material and arguments for detailed consideration in subsequent deliberations of the WG. * The WG will not spend time reconsidering materials and arguments that were already received and debated during the phase of our work preceding issuance of the Initial Report. Rather, we will focus on new assertions of fact and law as well as critiques of the Initial Report that raise issues not previously considered. * Given the complex legal and policy issues under discussion as well as the controversial aspects of this debate within ICANN, the Co-Chairs believe that it is very important that our Final Report list all new facts and legal arguments brought to our attention by the public comments and document the reasons why the WG accepted them and made commensurate adjustments, or rejected them and left initial recommendations intact. Thank you for your consideration of our thoughts on how we should proceed toward completion of our work. We welcome your feedback on our upcoming call today and on this email list. Best regards, Philip and Petter Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal Virtualaw LLC 1155 F Street, NW Suite 1050 Washington, DC 20004 202-559-8597/Direct 202-559-8750/Fax 202-255-6172/Cell Twitter: @VlawDC "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey

1 0