This is precisely why I think we need to have a vote that is much more obvious about who is voting in support (or not) of what. It should ALSO be made VERY clear what an abstention means. I take it to mean "no" but I know that is not a universal view. -- Reg Levy Director of Compliance Tucows D: +1 (323) 880-0831 O: +1 (416) 535-0123 x1452 UTC -7
On 11 Jun 2018, at 15:00, George Kirikos <icann@leap.com> wrote:
Actually, I spoke too soon. For Recommendation #2, the text was changed (to what I initially thought was acceptable), but it only captured *part* of the change, not the full change. i.e. my change was:
"An IGO may consider this to be an option where it does not have registered trademark rights or service mark rights in its name or acronym (as applicable) but believes it has certain unregistered trademark or service marks rights for which it might adduce….."
But this new document instead says:
"An IGO may consider this to be an option where it does not have registered trademark rights or service mark rights in its name or acronym (as applicable) but believes it has certain unregistered rights for which it might adduce….."
i.e. the *second* "trademark or service" marks is *missing* from this new version. So, unless the wording is changed again, count me as *NOT SUPPORT* of this text.
I'm going to go through this more thoroughly later, and consolidate all future comments into a single email.
Sincerely,
George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 5:34 PM, George Kirikos <icann@leap.com> wrote:
This is late, and given what I've posted the past few days, one would have expected it to have been triple-checked for accuracy, etc. I went directly to Recommendation #2, and noticed I'm now listed as "Support" and Paul Tattersfield is listed as "do not support" (whereas in the document before this, sent by Petter, both Paul T. and I were listed as "do not support"):
https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/2018-June/001238.html
Here was my comment: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/2018-June/001219.html
and Paul T's: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/2018-June/001237.html
both of us wanted slight changing of the wording.
So, I see that the document that Steve circulated *does* change the wording, so my "Support" in the new document is accurate. But, then since Paul T agreed with me (and presumably agrees with the new text), why is he still listed as "Do Not Support"???
Also, we know from posts on the mailing list that Jim Bikoff expressly said he only supports Recommendation #1 !
https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/2018-June/001256.html
"All, please understand my position in support of recommendation 1 that no change to UDRP or URS or special procedure is warranted.
No support for other recommendations."
So, that's 2 errors (i.e. Paul T flips to "Support" and Jim Bikoff is added to "Do not support")
So, this *still* has *obvious* errors, and I haven't even reviewed it closely (so there could be, and probably are, even more). I have so little confidence, I basically have to *redo* it on my own, on a compressed time frame.
As for the agenda, I'd like my new Section 3.7 appeal to be a topic added to the agenda (which does require a call between the chair and myself, and since we're both going to be present -- or it could be immediately after the call), along with the general topic of how it's humanly possible to get a final report out by Sunday. Or if it's already been decided that that timeline is off the table, tell us now, to release some pressure from this PDP.
Sincerely,
George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 5:03 PM, Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org> wrote:
Dear WG Members,
With apologies for late delivery, as George noted, please find the proposed agenda for the WG call on 12 June 2018 at 16:00 UTC for 90 minutes.
Welcome / SOIs Review of Initial Consensus Level Designations Next Steps AOB
In regards to agenda item 2, please see the attached document to support those discussions. This document follows and is a revised version of the one sent by Petter on 9 June 2018.
Best,
Steve
Steven Chan
Policy Director, GNSO Support
ICANN
12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
steve.chan@icann.org
mobile: +1.310.339.4410
office tel: +1.310.301.5800
office fax: +1.310.823.8649
Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages.
Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO
Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/
_______________________________________________ Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list Gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp
Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list Gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp