If u send me the original and your changed version (without your manual redlines etc but with formatting) i can generate a redline using the compare feature of word. Sincerely, Paul Keating, Esq.
On Jun 20, 2018, at 2:25 AM, George Kirikos <icann@leap.com> wrote:
Hi folks,
During the last call, Phil suggested a redline of proposed changes would be desirable. I don't own software of my own that does this. I also searched for online tools that do this, but couldn't find anything suitable. But, I did attempt to create such "redline" text manually, and it's attached as a PDP.
I started with Recommendation 2, since that was the 'easiest' (i.e. adding 4 words, to restrict things definitively to "trademark and service mark" rights).
For Recommendation 1, I reordered and rephrased the existing recommendation slightly, for clarity. I also added the text that I thought should be in a recommendation that no specific new DRP be created for IGOs.
Since some would rather keep Recommendation 1 limited only to INGOs, I then offered an alternative, namely adding it into Recommendation 3 instead.
Also, I'm not sure if folks noticed, but some text was deleted from Recommendation 3, compared to what appeared in January 2017. I pointed out phrases that we might want to put back, for clarity.
I also found a possible error in how Recommendation 3 was worded, relative to the comparable text from January 2017. Back in January 2017, there was some text after a semi-colon (i.e. a separate thought), that somehow got merged now into the prior text, without any semi-colon. So, it doesn't make sense anymore to me. This stuff was non-controversial (i.e. the assignee, licensee, agent procedural guidance), but it kind of got mixed up with other text that was after the semi-colon.
Sincerely,
George Kirikos 416-588-0266 http://www.leap.com/ <suggested-text-igo-pdp-20180619.pdf> _______________________________________________ Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list Gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp