IGO PDP -- suggested text for recommendation language tweaks, and manually generated redline
Hi folks, During the last call, Phil suggested a redline of proposed changes would be desirable. I don't own software of my own that does this. I also searched for online tools that do this, but couldn't find anything suitable. But, I did attempt to create such "redline" text manually, and it's attached as a PDP. I started with Recommendation 2, since that was the 'easiest' (i.e. adding 4 words, to restrict things definitively to "trademark and service mark" rights). For Recommendation 1, I reordered and rephrased the existing recommendation slightly, for clarity. I also added the text that I thought should be in a recommendation that no specific new DRP be created for IGOs. Since some would rather keep Recommendation 1 limited only to INGOs, I then offered an alternative, namely adding it into Recommendation 3 instead. Also, I'm not sure if folks noticed, but some text was deleted from Recommendation 3, compared to what appeared in January 2017. I pointed out phrases that we might want to put back, for clarity. I also found a possible error in how Recommendation 3 was worded, relative to the comparable text from January 2017. Back in January 2017, there was some text after a semi-colon (i.e. a separate thought), that somehow got merged now into the prior text, without any semi-colon. So, it doesn't make sense anymore to me. This stuff was non-controversial (i.e. the assignee, licensee, agent procedural guidance), but it kind of got mixed up with other text that was after the semi-colon. Sincerely, George Kirikos 416-588-0266 http://www.leap.com/
Thanks! Let's discuss this further on our WG meeting this Thursday. Best, Petter -- Petter Rindforth, LL M Fenix Legal KB Stureplan 4c, 4tr 114 35 Stockholm Sweden Fax: +46(0)8-4631010 Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360 E-mail: petter.rindforth@fenixlegal.eu www.fenixlegal.eu NOTICE This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are requested not to read, copy or distribute it or any of the information it contains. Please delete it immediately and notify us by return e-mail. Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, www.fenixlegal.eu Thank you 20 juni 2018 02:24:33 +02:00, skrev George Kirikos <icann@leap.com>:
Hi folks,
During the last call, Phil suggested a redline of proposed changes would be desirable. I don't own software of my own that does this. I also searched for online tools that do this, but couldn't find anything suitable. But, I did attempt to create such "redline" text manually, and it's attached as a PDP.
I started with Recommendation 2, since that was the 'easiest' (i.e. adding 4 words, to restrict things definitively to "trademark and service mark" rights).
For Recommendation 1, I reordered and rephrased the existing recommendation slightly, for clarity. I also added the text that I thought should be in a recommendation that no specific new DRP be created for IGOs.
Since some would rather keep Recommendation 1 limited only to INGOs, I then offered an alternative, namely adding it into Recommendation 3 instead.
Also, I'm not sure if folks noticed, but some text was deleted from Recommendation 3, compared to what appeared in January 2017. I pointed out phrases that we might want to put back, for clarity.
I also found a possible error in how Recommendation 3 was worded, relative to the comparable text from January 2017. Back in January 2017, there was some text after a semi-colon (i.e. a separate thought), that somehow got merged now into the prior text, without any semi-colon. So, it doesn't make sense anymore to me. This stuff was non-controversial (i.e. the assignee, licensee, agent procedural guidance), but it kind of got mixed up with other text that was after the semi-colon.
Sincerely,
George Kirikos 416-588-0266 <http://www.leap.com/>
_______________________________________________ Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list Gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp>
If u send me the original and your changed version (without your manual redlines etc but with formatting) i can generate a redline using the compare feature of word. Sincerely, Paul Keating, Esq.
On Jun 20, 2018, at 2:25 AM, George Kirikos <icann@leap.com> wrote:
Hi folks,
During the last call, Phil suggested a redline of proposed changes would be desirable. I don't own software of my own that does this. I also searched for online tools that do this, but couldn't find anything suitable. But, I did attempt to create such "redline" text manually, and it's attached as a PDP.
I started with Recommendation 2, since that was the 'easiest' (i.e. adding 4 words, to restrict things definitively to "trademark and service mark" rights).
For Recommendation 1, I reordered and rephrased the existing recommendation slightly, for clarity. I also added the text that I thought should be in a recommendation that no specific new DRP be created for IGOs.
Since some would rather keep Recommendation 1 limited only to INGOs, I then offered an alternative, namely adding it into Recommendation 3 instead.
Also, I'm not sure if folks noticed, but some text was deleted from Recommendation 3, compared to what appeared in January 2017. I pointed out phrases that we might want to put back, for clarity.
I also found a possible error in how Recommendation 3 was worded, relative to the comparable text from January 2017. Back in January 2017, there was some text after a semi-colon (i.e. a separate thought), that somehow got merged now into the prior text, without any semi-colon. So, it doesn't make sense anymore to me. This stuff was non-controversial (i.e. the assignee, licensee, agent procedural guidance), but it kind of got mixed up with other text that was after the semi-colon.
Sincerely,
George Kirikos 416-588-0266 http://www.leap.com/ <suggested-text-igo-pdp-20180619.pdf> _______________________________________________ Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list Gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp
Hello Paul and George, thank you - staff is generating a redline of George's suggestions that we will send to the list today. Best regards, Mary & Steve On 6/20/18, 07:23, "Gnso-igo-ingo-crp on behalf of Paul Keating" <gnso-igo-ingo-crp-bounces@icann.org on behalf of paul@law.es> wrote: If u send me the original and your changed version (without your manual redlines etc but with formatting) i can generate a redline using the compare feature of word. Sincerely, Paul Keating, Esq. > On Jun 20, 2018, at 2:25 AM, George Kirikos <icann@leap.com> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > During the last call, Phil suggested a redline of proposed changes > would be desirable. I don't own software of my own that does this. I > also searched for online tools that do this, but couldn't find > anything suitable. But, I did attempt to create such "redline" text > manually, and it's attached as a PDP. > > I started with Recommendation 2, since that was the 'easiest' (i.e. > adding 4 words, to restrict things definitively to "trademark and > service mark" rights). > > For Recommendation 1, I reordered and rephrased the existing > recommendation slightly, for clarity. I also added the text that I > thought should be in a recommendation that no specific new DRP be > created for IGOs. > > Since some would rather keep Recommendation 1 limited only to INGOs, I > then offered an alternative, namely adding it into Recommendation 3 > instead. > > Also, I'm not sure if folks noticed, but some text was deleted from > Recommendation 3, compared to what appeared in January 2017. I pointed > out phrases that we might want to put back, for clarity. > > I also found a possible error in how Recommendation 3 was worded, > relative to the comparable text from January 2017. Back in January > 2017, there was some text after a semi-colon (i.e. a separate > thought), that somehow got merged now into the prior text, without any > semi-colon. So, it doesn't make sense anymore to me. This stuff was > non-controversial (i.e. the assignee, licensee, agent procedural > guidance), but it kind of got mixed up with other text that was after > the semi-colon. > > Sincerely, > > George Kirikos > 416-588-0266 > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.leap.com_&d=DwICAg&c... > <suggested-text-igo-pdp-20180619.pdf> > _______________________________________________ > Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list > Gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp _______________________________________________ Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list Gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp
participants (4)
-
George Kirikos -
Mary Wong -
Paul Keating -
Petter Rindforth