Wich new design and implementation requirements are you talking about Volker? Thanks. Theo Volker Greimann schreef op 2016-09-09 04:13 PM:
Well, I was a member of the PDP and when I supported a switch, I assumed this would be a quick thing:
The legal issues would be sorted, the remaining thin registries would set up thick whois servers, get a data dump from the registrars and after a short switchover time, registrars would updated their EPP protocols to a standard used by currently thick registries and afterward, a delta file would be sent for final changes. Quick and dirty and very cheap to implement.
I did not imagine that everyone would try to reinvent the wheel in the implementation process. EPP is pretty much standardized, registrars use EPP to send registration data to thick registries. The same implementation could be used for the currently thin registries.
Of course we were aware that RDS would be coming at some point, so no one even considered that this be overdesigned and complicated beyond belief as it would only be for a short period of time. The more complicated it gets and the more implementation time and cost expenditure is invested, the more you remove the basic common sense understanding of making this change.
I still favor a change to thick over thin, but for all our sakes, make it as easy as possible without adding new design and implementation requirements. Use what we already have and be done with it.
Best,
Volker
Am 09.09.2016 um 15:43 schrieb Marika Konings:
Having supported the Thick WHOIS PDP WG, I believe most if not all of its members were well aware of the work that was ongoing in parallel, but nevertheless the assumption was that it could take some time for that work to complete and that any transition to a new model/system would be easier if all registries would be operating under the same model. It is also one of the questions that is included in the RDS PDP WG Charter: Coexistence: What steps should be taken to enable next-generation RDS coexistence with and replacement of the legacy WHOIS system?
Of course, I am happy to stand corrected if my recollection is wrong.
Best regards,
Marika
On 09/09/16 03:40, "Volker Greimann" <vgreimann@key-systems.net> wrote:
Hi Steve,
I am not proposing to tear it up, although your raising it a possibility
made me think it could be an alternative. After all, when the PDP WG
deliberated this, the EWG was still in its infancy and a common whois
system seemed like a good idea. Now that the GNSO is working on
establishing an alternate RDS which admittedly is still years on the
horizon means that ultimately the thick whois model this group is trying
to find an implementation for will in all likelyhood ultimately end up
being superseded.
This is why I am advocating a very lightweight transition model. Limit
the implementation needs to the barest minimum possible. For example,
who needs new EPP extentions and contacts for resellers when the same
can be achieved with existing means.
All our work here should be undertaken with the awareness of the very
real possibility that we are working on something ultimately destined
the trash can.
Best regards,
Volker
Am 09.09.2016 um 10:05 schrieb gtheo:
Hi Steve, et al.
I guess that listing those benefits wasn't the greatest move on my
part and could be perceived as I am suggesting :"Let's tear this thing
up". Though it does somewhat highlight the fact that there is
currently nothing wrong with the thin WHOIS in the sense that anything
is broken here operational wise, and needs fixing ASAP.
However, I am not suggesting to tear it up, beside that is not up to
us anyways.
Furthermore, I am NOT even sure if that is the solution anyways. It is
that complex.
I do think we have not explored all the options. Let me elaborate on
that some more and make a suggestion to the IRT and ICANN staff.
This morning I had a conversation with the Dutch Registry for
.Amsterdam and .FRL to get more feedback on their process, to deal
with the situation with their Thick WHOIS issues. Turns out they are
currently having a discussion with ICANN GDD and from what I heard
they are making progress. I find this highly interesting as there is
no trigger they can use for the old waiver process from 2006.
I would suggest if there are no objections we ask Cyrus from the GDD
to attend our next call or participate on the list and give us more
info on:
-how does it work?
-what are the timelines?
-expected duration?
-what are the practical issues?
-etc
If we get more insight here then perhaps we can streamline this and
make it work?
The only issue here is, that it seems out of scope for the IRT. Yet it
may be a path forward for us.
Best regards,
Theo
Metalitz, Steven schreef op 2016-09-08 05:25 PM:
Theo’s ruminations lead me to repeat the questions I posed to Marc
last week about his draft memo:
(1) The first two developments to which you cite are the
invalidation of the US-EU Safe Harbor Program and the adoption of the
EU-US Privacy Shield framework to replace it. My impression is that
US registries generally did not rely upon the Safe Harbor in
processing thick Whois data (e.g., receiving Whois data containing
personally identifiable information from European registrars and
making it available through registry Whois), and so would not have
been directly impacted by its invalidation. Is my impression wrong?
If I am correct then what is the relevance of either the Safe Harbor
or the Privacy Shield in this context?
(2) The last paragraph refers to data localization laws apart from
EU privacy/data protection laws. Can you be more specific? I note
that the Russian law was referenced in footnotes 2 and 10 of the legal
review provided to the IRT in June 2015, are there other issues not
covered by that analysis?
(3) If the IRT were to send this letter, the GNSO council might
well ask what (if anything) we are asking them to do. How would you
respond?
In particular, If I understand Theo correctly, his answer to #3 would
be “please tear up the consensus policy recommended by the Working
Group, adopted by the GNSO Council, and approved by the ICANN board,
it is obsolete, and let’s not waste [further] time implementing
it.” Is that reading correct, and do others in the IRT support
that?
STEVEN J. METALITZ | PARTNER, THROUGH HIS PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
T: 202.355.7902 | met@msk.com
MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP | WWW.MSK.COM [1] [3]
1818 N Street NW, 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20036
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR
THE PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENTS. THIS
MESSAGE MAY BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, AND AS SUCH IS
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT AN
INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY REVIEW, USE,
DISSEMINATION, FORWARDING OR COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS STRICTLY
PROHIBITED. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY REPLY E-MAIL OR TELEPHONE,
AND DELETE THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE AND ALL ATTACHMENTS FROM YOUR SYSTEM.
THANK YOU.
FROM: gtheo [mailto:gtheo@xs4all.nl]
SENT: Thursday, September 08, 2016 6:57 AM
TO: Marika Konings; Metalitz, Steven; 'Volker Greimann'
CC: gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt@icann.org
SUBJECT: Re: [Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt] [for iRT review] Draft Thick
Whois Transition Policy for .COM, .NET, and .JOBS
Interesting review. After reading it I agree with Volker here.
Few things that stood out.
It seems the focus was put on the 95/46/EC Directive (makes sense) but
Safe Harbor was not included in. I am not sure if that was intended? I
would not be surprised that anyone ever thought that it would be a
possibility that it would be invalidated, and what the consequences
are.
Anyways, we just need a good procedure for this IRT. The legal review
does not address the current impediment, so that is not up to us.
What is up to us, maybe, are the benefits mentioned in the legal
review (page5)?
Let me list them:
1. A thick Whois model offers attractive archival and restoration
properties. If a registrar were to go out of business or experience
long-term technical failures rendering
them unable to provide service, registries maintaining thick Whois
have all the registrant information at hand and could transfer the
registrations to a different (or temporary) registrar so that
registrants could continue to manage their domain names.
2. A thick Whois model reduces the degree of variability in display
formats.
3. Establishing requirements such as collecting uniform sets of
data, and display standards, improves consistency across all gTLDs at
all levels and result in better access to Whois data for all users of
Whois databases (e.g. law enforcement, Intellectual Property holders,
etc).
4. The uptime of the registry with respect to Whois data has
typically been found to be better (at least marginally) than the
registrar.
I am not sure about the rest of you, but this re-enforces the point
that this migration has been in the freezer for too long.
Point 1, that's why we have escrow obligations. The reasoning in
point 1 is not sustainable for the future I am afraid.
Point 2 and 3, This has been addressed by the RAA 2013 and the AWIP
policy released in 2015.
Point 4, I suspect with RDAP this problem will also be solved.
Beside the RAA 2013 also addresses this with an SLA.
One could almost argue there are no benefits. Not sure if you guys
want to circle back on this one and include this in a side note for
the comment period.
Also, interesting to read but, out of scope for this IRT (I think) is
the RDAP solution (page 12 of the legal review)? It could be me, but
it almost looks like if there was a quick procedure and workable
procedure then the technical issue would be solved also, and it would
solve our impediment.
Thank you for making it this far.
Theo
theo geurts schreef op 2016-09-07 10:22 PM:
Thanks, Marika,
I'll give that one a read tomorrow. Though I think Volker is right.
Seems we are operating under old marching orders, Steve already
warned
us that this thing has taken way too long. The draft Verisign
prepared
does actually highlight the current situation. And to be fair? How
many people would have thought that Safe Harbor would have been
invalidated? Not me for sure. But I also did not predict the brexit
or
Trump running for president.
In addition to this, I think we are in agreement here. It is not up
to
this IRT. We can only signal the GNSO that most likely we have a
few
impediments.
Best regards,
Theo
On 7-9-2016 16:53, Marika Konings wrote:
And it can be found here:
https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/52889541/ICANN%20Memorandum....
Best regards,
Marika
MARIKA KONINGS
Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet
Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: marika.konings@icann.org
_ _
_Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO_
_Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses [10
[1]]
and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages [11]._
FROM: <gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of
"Metalitz, Steven" <met@msk.com>
DATE: Wednesday 7 September 2016 at 08:44
TO: 'Volker Greimann' <vgreimann@key-systems.net>, gtheo
<gtheo@xs4all.nl>
CC: "gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt@icann.org"
<gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt@icann.org>
SUBJECT: Re: [Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt] [for iRT review] Draft Thick
Whois Transition Policy for .COM, .NET, and .JOBS
That legal review was undertaken more than a year ago.
STEVEN J. METALITZ | PARTNER, THROUGH HIS PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
T: 202.355.7902 | met@msk.com
MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP | WWW.MSK.COM [1] [2] [1 [3]]
1818 N Street NW, 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20036
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY
FOR THE PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENTS.
THIS MESSAGE MAY BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, AND AS SUCH IS
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT AN
INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY REVIEW, USE,
DISSEMINATION, FORWARDING OR COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS STRICTLY
PROHIBITED. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY REPLY E-MAIL OR
TELEPHONE, AND DELETE THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE AND ALL ATTACHMENTS FROM
YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU.
FROM: Volker Greimann [mailto:vgreimann@key-systems.net]
SENT: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 10:44 AM
TO: Metalitz, Steven; gtheo
CC: gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt@icann.org
SUBJECT: Re: [Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt] [for iRT review] Draft Thick
Whois Transition Policy for .COM, .NET, and .JOBS
Partially. As the thick whois WG clearly recommended that a legal
review be undertaken with regard to the impact of any implementation
on local privacy legislations, the question of available excemptions
may well become relevant to such a review.
Best,
Volker
Am 07.09.2016 um 16:38 schrieb Metalitz, Steven:
Agree that this issue is outside the scope of this group.
STEVEN J. METALITZ | PARTNER, THROUGH HIS PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
T: 202.355.7902 | met@msk.com
MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPPLLP | WWW.MSK.COM [1] [2] [1 [3]]
1818 N Street NW, 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20036
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY
FOR THE PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED
RECIPIENTS. THIS MESSAGE MAY BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION,
AND AS SUCH IS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS
MESSAGE IS NOT AN INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT
ANY REVIEW, USE, DISSEMINATION, FORWARDING OR COPYING OF THIS
MESSAGE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY
REPLY E-MAIL OR TELEPHONE, AND DELETE THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE AND ALL
ATTACHMENTS FROM YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU.
FROM: gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt-bounces@icann.org
[mailto:gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt-bounces@icann.org] ON BEHALF OF
Volker Greimann
SENT: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 9:28 AM
TO: gtheo
CC: gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt@icann.org
SUBJECT: Re: [Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt] [for iRT review] Draft
Thick Whois Transition Policy for .COM, .NET, and .JOBS
Well, I agree that we need a workable process for obtaining an
excemption, but that is a discussion for another group, I guess.
An
Implementation Advisory Group, if you will. I hear there may soon
be
another one of those. ;-)
Best,
Volker
Am 07.09.2016 um 15:18 schrieb gtheo:
That might be a way forward Volker.
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/waiver-request-process-2013-09-13-en
However, that one wasn't exactly "speedy". Took me two years to
obtain
one.
The invalidation of Safe Harbor was rather sudden. Some
governments
displayed the last 12 months that things can change at record
speed
law wise.
I guess the problem boils down to this.
-Sudden changes in law putting migrated Registrar businesses at
risk.
-The procedure can take much longer than the proposed timeline.
-There might be Registrars that cannot migrate.
I am not sure, but I have the feeling that it is not up to the
IRT to
fix this as it is out of scope.
Though Registrars who cannot migrate, we might want to mention
RDAP.
Even though that is already mentioned in the RDAP spec when it
comes
to Thin WHOIS Registries.
Theo
Volker Greimann schreef op 2016-09-07 01:24 PM:
How about adding: "Further procedures for resolving conflicts
with
local privacy laws are included in the 2013 RAA Data Retention
specification"?
Am 07.09.2016 um 12:52 schrieb gtheo:
Hello all,
_1. Where a conflict exists between local privacy laws and
requirements included in this Policy, ICANN's Procedure for
Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Laws is available for
Registry
Operators and Registrars. _
We didn't get around this yesterday, wich is fine. Let us see
if we
can have some discussion in advance about this as I am
struggling
with this section for a few now.
The text itself is good, as in, this is what I expected after
the
discussions we had about this in the last few months.
What I am not sure off is how to deal with this in the sense of
moving forward to the comment period.
The procedure is not working, but is outside of this IRT to
address,
yet this IRT relies on it.
Are we going to put in a footnote in the report that says
something
like:
_Outside the scope of the IRT to address, but we wish the
Registrars
and Registrants the best of luck!_
Thanks,
Theo
Dennis Chang schreef op 2016-09-02 02:05 AM:
Dear Thick Whois Policy Implementation Review Team,
Attached for your review is our initial draft of the Thick
Whois
Transition Policy for .COM, .NET and .JOBS. The draft Policy
includes
the various elements discussed in our recent meeting on this
topic.
As you review the draft, you will find bracketed text in four
sections: sections 2.9, 2.10, 3.4 and 3.5. These sections are
bracketed because they reference the Registry Registration Data
Directory Services Consistent Labeling and Display Policy and
the
Registration Data Access Protocol gTLD Profile. As you may be
aware, a
Request for Reconsideration (RfR) was submitted by the
Registries
Stakeholder Group in August regarding the Registry Registration
Data
Directory Services Consistent Labeling and Display Policy [1
[1]]
that was
published on 26 July 2016. The RfR objects to the inclusion of
RDAP in
the Consensus Policy. While the RfR goes through its own
process,
we
thought it was important to continue progressing the
implementation
project with the goal of opening Public Comment in September
and
announcing the Transition Policy by 1 February 2017 per our
schedule.
Therefore, the text is bracketed as it may need to be revisited
pending the resolution of the RfR and we wanted to directly
call
the
IRT's attention to it.
We will review all contents of the document at our next IRT
meeting as
a team but please provide your comments in advance via email if
possible.
Thank you for your support!
--
Kind Regards,
Dennis S. Chang
GDD Services & Engagement Program Director
+1 213 293 7889
Skype: dennisSchang
www.icann.org [2] [4] [2 [4]] [2 [4]] "One World, One Internet"
Links:
------
[1 [3]]
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/rdds-labeling-policy-2016-07-26-en
_______________________________________________
Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt mailing list
Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt
_______________________________________________
Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt mailing list
Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt
--
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann@key-systems.net
Web: www.key-systems.net [3] [5] [3 [5]] / www.RRPproxy.net [4] [6] [4 [6]]
www.domaindiscount24.com [5] [7] [5 [7]] / www.BrandShelter.com [6] [8] [6
[8]]
Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems [7] [9] [7 [9]]
www.twitter.com/key_systems [8] [10] [8 [10]]
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu [9] [11] [9 [11]]
Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den
angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe,
Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger
ist unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt
sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per E-Mail oder telefonisch
in Verbindung zu setzen.
--------------------------------------------
Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to
contact us.
Best regards,
Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann@key-systems.net
Web: www.key-systems.net [3] [5] [3 [5]] / www.RRPproxy.net [4] [6] [4 [6]]
www.domaindiscount24.com [5] [7] [5 [7]] / www.BrandShelter.com [6] [8] [6
[8]]
Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and
stay updated:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems [7] [9] [7 [9]]
www.twitter.com/key_systems [8] [10] [8 [10]]
CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu [9] [11] [9 [11]]
This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to
whom it is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish
any content of this email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print
or rely on this e-mail. If an addressing or transmission error has
misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the author by replying to
this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.
_______________________________________________
Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt mailing list
Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt
--
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann@key-systems.net
Web: www.key-systems.net [3] [5] [3 [5]] / www.RRPproxy.net [4] [6] [4 [6]]
www.domaindiscount24.com [5] [7] [5 [7]] / www.BrandShelter.com [6] [8] [6
[8]]
Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems [7] [9] [7 [9]]
www.twitter.com/key_systems [8] [10] [8 [10]]
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu [9] [11] [9 [11]]
Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den
angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe,
Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist
unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so
bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per E-Mail oder telefonisch in
Verbindung zu setzen.
--------------------------------------------
Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to
contact us.
Best regards,
Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann@key-systems.net
Web: www.key-systems.net [3] [5] [3 [5]] / www.RRPproxy.net [4] [6] [4 [6]]
www.domaindiscount24.com [5] [7] [5 [7]] / www.BrandShelter.com [6] [8] [6
[8]]
Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay
updated:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems [7] [9] [7 [9]]
www.twitter.com/key_systems [8] [10] [8 [10]]
CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu [9] [11] [9 [11]]
This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to
whom it is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any
content of this email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or
rely on this e-mail. If an addressing or transmission error has
misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the author by replying to
this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.
Links:
------
[11]
http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-e...
_______________________________________________
Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt mailing list
Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt
Links:
------
--
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann@key-systems.net
Web: www.key-systems.net [3] / www.RRPproxy.net [4]
www.domaindiscount24.com [5] / www.BrandShelter.com [6]
Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems [7]
www.twitter.com/key_systems [8]
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu [9]
Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.
--------------------------------------------
Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Best regards,
Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann@key-systems.net
Web: www.key-systems.net [3] / www.RRPproxy.net [4]
www.domaindiscount24.com [5] / www.BrandShelter.com [6]
Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems [7]
www.twitter.com/key_systems [8]
CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu [9]
This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.
-- Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Volker A. Greimann - Rechtsabteilung -
Key-Systems GmbH Im Oberen Werk 1 66386 St. Ingbert Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901 Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851 Email: vgreimann@key-systems.net
Web: www.key-systems.net [3] / www.RRPproxy.net [4] www.domaindiscount24.com [5] / www.BrandShelter.com [6]
Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook: www.facebook.com/KeySystems [7] www.twitter.com/key_systems [8]
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP www.keydrive.lu [9]
Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.
--------------------------------------------
Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Best regards,
Volker A. Greimann - legal department -
Key-Systems GmbH Im Oberen Werk 1 66386 St. Ingbert Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901 Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851 Email: vgreimann@key-systems.net
Web: www.key-systems.net [3] / www.RRPproxy.net [4] www.domaindiscount24.com [5] / www.BrandShelter.com [6]
Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated: www.facebook.com/KeySystems [7] www.twitter.com/key_systems [8]
CEO: Alexander Siffrin Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP www.keydrive.lu [9]
This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.
Links: ------ [1] http://WWW.MSK.COM [2] http://www.icann.org [3] http://www.key-systems.net [4] http://www.RRPproxy.net [5] http://www.domaindiscount24.com [6] http://www.BrandShelter.com [7] http://www.facebook.com/KeySystems [8] http://www.twitter.com/key_systems [9] http://www.keydrive.lu