Mary, Please see below regarding Consensus Call related to WG Consensus levels proposal from SCI. I responded for IPC May 6 and Avri weighed in May 7 I think. Thank you, Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | Suite 700 One South Church Avenue Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 AAikman@LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 11:57 AM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: Consensus Call - GNSO Working Groups Consensus Levels document On 06-May-14 18:42, Aikman-Scalese, Anne wrote:
Ron, Mary, et al – On behalf of IPC, we support. We also note that it
is within the purview of SCI to undertake the longer term study of WG
Consensus levels and perhaps this should be mentioned when reporting
to Council.
With all of the GNSO Review work about to start, I would not be too quick to jump into this particular activity. As a council member my inclination would be to defer this subject to the GNSO review. But as a SCI member, I have no objection to the request being made, it is just one I am not inclined toward. I am especially uncomfortable with the topic for the SCI as it is all tied up in the PDP by-laws and the nature of the house structure. avri ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this message or any attachments contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.