hi Anne, i think "suspension of a PDP" could be stretched and tugged to just barely fit under the proposed (and current) charter. i agree that "resubmission of a motion" is out of scope for both our current and proposed charters -- as that is purely a matter of Council rules of procedure. i think taking that one on is an especially good example of modifying our mission to becoming the "standing GNSO rules committee," which we may want to avoid. mikey PS. i changed the subject line to Mikey -- Mickey is a mouse On Jul 2, 2013, at 11:37 AM, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@lrlaw.com> wrote:
My view is that neither the "suspension of a PDP" already completed nor the "resubmission of a motion" work requested by the GNSO Council is within the scope of this amended charter as redrafted.
By the way in relation to the resubmission of a motion, I think GNSO changed the time for notifying of a motion to 10 calendar days in advance at 11:59 UTC or something like that. I am sure staff can clarify. Anne
<image001.gif>Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700 One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725 AAikman@LRLaw.com • www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message.
From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 10:50 AM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Charter -- Latest Version from Mickey
All,
For reference for our discussion tomorrow, please see the latest version of the SCI Charter that includes the suggested edits from Mickey.
Best regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com.
Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900 Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400 Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.
In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.
PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)