SCI Charter -- Latest Version from Mickey
All, For reference for our discussion tomorrow, please see the latest version of the SCI Charter that includes the suggested edits from Mickey. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
My view is that neither the "suspension of a PDP" already completed nor the "resubmission of a motion" work requested by the GNSO Council is within the scope of this amended charter as redrafted. By the way in relation to the resubmission of a motion, I think GNSO changed the time for notifying of a motion to 10 calendar days in advance at 11:59 UTC or something like that. I am sure staff can clarify. Anne [cid:094223416@02072013-17F0]Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700 One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725 AAikman@LRLaw.com<mailto:AAikman@LRLaw.com> • www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman<http://www.lewisandroca.com/Aikman> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message. ________________________________ From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 10:50 AM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Charter -- Latest Version from Mickey All, For reference for our discussion tomorrow, please see the latest version of the SCI Charter that includes the suggested edits from Mickey. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director ________________________________ For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com<http://www.lewisandroca.com/>. Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900 Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400 Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380 This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.
hi Anne, i think "suspension of a PDP" could be stretched and tugged to just barely fit under the proposed (and current) charter. i agree that "resubmission of a motion" is out of scope for both our current and proposed charters -- as that is purely a matter of Council rules of procedure. i think taking that one on is an especially good example of modifying our mission to becoming the "standing GNSO rules committee," which we may want to avoid. mikey PS. i changed the subject line to Mikey -- Mickey is a mouse On Jul 2, 2013, at 11:37 AM, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@lrlaw.com> wrote:
My view is that neither the "suspension of a PDP" already completed nor the "resubmission of a motion" work requested by the GNSO Council is within the scope of this amended charter as redrafted.
By the way in relation to the resubmission of a motion, I think GNSO changed the time for notifying of a motion to 10 calendar days in advance at 11:59 UTC or something like that. I am sure staff can clarify. Anne
<image001.gif>Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700 One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725 AAikman@LRLaw.com • www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message.
From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 10:50 AM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Charter -- Latest Version from Mickey
All,
For reference for our discussion tomorrow, please see the latest version of the SCI Charter that includes the suggested edits from Mickey.
Best regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com.
Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900 Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400 Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.
In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.
PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
Hi Mikey, I think the term "final review" puts the PDP suspension out of bounds, too. Anne [X]Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700 One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725 AAikman@LRLaw.com<mailto:AAikman@LRLaw.com> • www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman<http://www.lewisandroca.com/Aikman> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message. ________________________________ From: Mike O'Connor [mailto:mike@haven2.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 9:53 AM To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne Cc: 'Julie Hedlund'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Charter Latest Version from Mikey hi Anne, i think "suspension of a PDP" could be stretched and tugged to just barely fit under the proposed (and current) charter. i agree that "resubmission of a motion" is out of scope for both our current and proposed charters -- as that is purely a matter of Council rules of procedure. i think taking that one on is an especially good example of modifying our mission to becoming the "standing GNSO rules committee," which we may want to avoid. mikey PS. i changed the subject line to Mikey -- Mickey is a mouse On Jul 2, 2013, at 11:37 AM, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@lrlaw.com<mailto:AAikman@lrlaw.com>> wrote: My view is that neither the "suspension of a PDP" already completed nor the "resubmission of a motion" work requested by the GNSO Council is within the scope of this amended charter as redrafted. By the way in relation to the resubmission of a motion, I think GNSO changed the time for notifying of a motion to 10 calendar days in advance at 11:59 UTC or something like that. I am sure staff can clarify. Anne <image001.gif>Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700 One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725 AAikman@LRLaw.com<mailto:AAikman@LRLaw.com> • www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman<http://www.lewisandroca.com/Aikman> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message. ________________________________ From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org<mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org> [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org>] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 10:50 AM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Charter -- Latest Version from Mickey All, For reference for our discussion tomorrow, please see the latest version of the SCI Charter that includes the suggested edits from Mickey. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director ________________________________ For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com<http://www.lewisandroca.com/>. Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900 Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400 Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380 This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com<http://www.haven2.com>, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) ________________________________ For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com<http://www.lewisandroca.com/>. Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900 Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400 Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380 This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.
Anne, As to your question about the number of days required to put forward a motion, the Council did approve a change to the procedures as follows. This was approved at the Council meeting on 13 June 2013: "Reports and motions should be submitted to the GNSO Council for inclusion on the agenda as soon as possible, but no later than 23h59 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) on the day, 10 calendar days before the GNSO Council meeting." Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director From: <Aikman-Scalese>, Anne <AAikman@lrlaw.com> Date: Tuesday, July 2, 2013 12:54 PM To: Mike O'Conner <mike@haven2.com> Cc: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org> Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Charter Latest Version from Mikey Hi Mikey, I think the term "final review" puts the PDP suspension out of bounds, too. Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel Lewis and Roca LLP Suite 700 One South Church Avenue Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 Tel (520) 629-4428 Fax (520) 879-4725 AAikman@LRLaw.com www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman <http://www.lewisandroca.com/Aikman> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete theoriginal message. From: Mike O'Connor [mailto:mike@haven2.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 9:53 AM To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne Cc: 'Julie Hedlund'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Charter Latest Version from Mikey hi Anne, i think "suspension of a PDP" could be stretched and tugged to just barely fit under the proposed (and current) charter. i agree that "resubmission of a motion" is out of scope for both our current and proposed charters -- as that is purely a matter of Council rules of procedure. i think taking that one on is an especially good example of modifying our mission to becoming the "standing GNSO rules committee," which we may want to avoid. mikey PS. i changed the subject line to Mikey -- Mickey is a mouse On Jul 2, 2013, at 11:37 AM, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@lrlaw.com> wrote:
My view is that neither the "suspension of a PDP" already completed nor the "resubmission of a motion" work requested by the GNSO Council is within the scope of this amended charter as redrafted.
By the way in relation to the resubmission of a motion, I think GNSO changed the time for notifying of a motion to 10 calendar days in advance at 11:59 UTC or something like that. I am sure staff can clarify. Anne
<image001.gif>Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel Lewis and Roca LLP Suite 700 One South Church Avenue Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 Tel (520) 629-4428 Fax (520) 879-4725 AAikman@LRLaw.com www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman <http://www.lewisandroca.com/Aikman>
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message.
From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 10:50 AM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Charter -- Latest Version from Mickey
All,
For reference for our discussion tomorrow, please see the latest version of the SCI Charter that includes the suggested edits from Mickey.
Best regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com <http://www.lewisandroca.com/> .
Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900 Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400 Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.
In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.
PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com <http://www.haven2.com> , HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com <http://www.lewisandroca.com/> . Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900 Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400 Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380 This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.
argh! you're right. Avri and i went back and forth on that "final review" language a while back on the list. i then rewrote my draft. and… apparently forgot to post it. so here it is. right at the 11th hour. my sincere apologies for neglecting to send it along earlier. see if this draft works better. mikey On Jul 2, 2013, at 11:54 AM, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@lrlaw.com> wrote:
Hi Mikey, I think the term "final review" puts the PDP suspension out of bounds, too. Anne
Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700 One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725 AAikman@LRLaw.com • www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message.
From: Mike O'Connor [mailto:mike@haven2.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 9:53 AM To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne Cc: 'Julie Hedlund'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Charter Latest Version from Mikey
hi Anne,
i think "suspension of a PDP" could be stretched and tugged to just barely fit under the proposed (and current) charter. i agree that "resubmission of a motion" is out of scope for both our current and proposed charters -- as that is purely a matter of Council rules of procedure. i think taking that one on is an especially good example of modifying our mission to becoming the "standing GNSO rules committee," which we may want to avoid.
mikey
PS. i changed the subject line to Mikey -- Mickey is a mouse
On Jul 2, 2013, at 11:37 AM, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@lrlaw.com> wrote:
My view is that neither the "suspension of a PDP" already completed nor the "resubmission of a motion" work requested by the GNSO Council is within the scope of this amended charter as redrafted.
By the way in relation to the resubmission of a motion, I think GNSO changed the time for notifying of a motion to 10 calendar days in advance at 11:59 UTC or something like that. I am sure staff can clarify. Anne
<image001.gif>Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700 One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725 AAikman@LRLaw.com • www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message.
From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 10:50 AM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Charter -- Latest Version from Mickey
All,
For reference for our discussion tomorrow, please see the latest version of the SCI Charter that includes the suggested edits from Mickey.
Best regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com.
Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900 Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400 Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.
In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.
PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com.
Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900 Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400 Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.
In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.
PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
Mickey, Thank you for the revised version. This is the version I will display in the Adobe Connect room for our call today at 1500 EDT/1200 PDT/1900 UTC. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director From: Mike O'Conner <mike@haven2.com> Date: Tuesday, July 2, 2013 1:13 PM To: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@lrlaw.com> Cc: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Charter Latest Version from Mikey argh! you're right. Avri and i went back and forth on that "final review" language a while back on the list. i then rewrote my draft. and apparently forgot to post it. so here it is. right at the 11th hour. my sincere apologies for neglecting to send it along earlier. see if this draft works better. mikey
Okay, so what exactly are the OSC and PPSC since I don't recall doing anything relating to them in the past couple of years? Also, why exactly do you want to make sure SCI has an end date if the Council is finding it useful for stuff like PDP suspension and resubmission of a motion? Anne [X]Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700 One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725 AAikman@LRLaw.com<mailto:AAikman@LRLaw.com> • www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman<http://www.lewisandroca.com/Aikman> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message. ________________________________ From: Mike O'Connor [mailto:mike@haven2.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 10:13 AM To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne Cc: 'Julie Hedlund'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Charter Latest Version from Mikey argh! you're right. Avri and i went back and forth on that "final review" language a while back on the list. i then rewrote my draft. and… apparently forgot to post it. so here it is. right at the 11th hour. my sincere apologies for neglecting to send it along earlier. see if this draft works better. mikey ________________________________ For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com<http://www.lewisandroca.com/>. Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900 Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400 Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380 This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.
Anne, I can answer your first question. The Operations Steering Committee (OSC) and the Policy Process Steering Committee (PPSC) were created under the GNSO Improvements Process that began in November 2008. Their Charters were approved in January 2009. They completed their work in January 2011 and September 2011 respectively. Here are some details from their archived wikis. You may wish to refer to the wikis, which although archived are still available, for more details: OSC: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoosc/Operations+Steering+Committee+%2 8OSC%29+-+Home The OSC is responsible for coordinating, recommending and reviewing changes to certain operational activities of the GNSO and its constituencies with a view to efficient outcomes. PPSC: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoppsc/PPSC+-+Home The Policy Process Steering Committee (PPSC) is responsible for reviewing and recommending processes used within the GNSO for developing policy and recommending any changes. The PPSC established two separate teams, one tasked with developing a proposal for a new WG model (WG-WT Home <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoppsc/WG-WT+Home> ) and the other a new policy development process (PDP-WT Home <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoppsc/PDP-WT+Home> ). Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director From: <Aikman-Scalese>, Anne <AAikman@lrlaw.com> Date: Tuesday, July 2, 2013 1:45 PM To: Mike O'Conner <mike@haven2.com> Cc: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org> Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Charter Latest Version from Mikey Okay, so what exactly are the OSC and PPSC since I don't recall doing anything relating to them in the past couple of years? Also, why exactly do you want to make sure SCI has an end date if the Council is finding it useful for stuff like PDP suspension and resubmission of a motion? Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700 One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725 AAikman@LRLaw.com • www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman <http://www.lewisandroca.com/Aikman> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete theoriginal message. From: Mike O'Connor [mailto:mike@haven2.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 10:13 AM To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne Cc: 'Julie Hedlund'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Charter Latest Version from Mikey argh! you're right. Avri and i went back and forth on that "final review" language a while back on the list. i then rewrote my draft. and… apparently forgot to post it. so here it is. right at the 11th hour. my sincere apologies for neglecting to send it along earlier. see if this draft works better. mikey For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com <http://www.lewisandroca.com/> . Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900 Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400 Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380 This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.
hi Anne, that's the nub of it for me. we were originally chartered as the caboose on a project. the last project in a big series of projects to revise the PDP. after we're done delivering our deliverables, we wrap up. what the requests from the Council do is turn us from a project (beginning, middle, end, beer) into a function (an ongoing thing that persists forever). i'm pretty uncomfortable making such a profound change because i'm not sure who asked us to do that, whether we are the right group, or whether the Council really intended to give up that ongoing "rules committee" job to us. On Jul 2, 2013, at 12:45 PM, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@lrlaw.com> wrote:
Okay, so what exactly are the OSC and PPSC since I don't recall doing anything relating to them in the past couple of years? Also, why exactly do you want to make sure SCI has an end date if the Council is finding it useful for stuff like PDP suspension and resubmission of a motion? Anne
Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700 One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725 AAikman@LRLaw.com • www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message.
From: Mike O'Connor [mailto:mike@haven2.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 10:13 AM To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne Cc: 'Julie Hedlund'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Charter Latest Version from Mikey
argh! you're right. Avri and i went back and forth on that "final review" language a while back on the list. i then rewrote my draft. and…
apparently forgot to post it.
so here it is. right at the 11th hour. my sincere apologies for neglecting to send it along earlier. see if this draft works better.
mikey
For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com.
Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900 Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400 Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.
In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.
PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
participants (3)
-
Aikman-Scalese, Anne -
Julie Hedlund -
Mike O'Connor