What we have found consensus is as it used to be: Initiate PDP Within Scope Bylaws:<http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#X-3.9> Art X, §3(9)b<http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#X-3.9>
⅓ Both OR ⅔ One
3 AND 5 5 OR 9 Terminate a PDP (“only for a significant cause”) Bylaws:<http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#X-3.9> Art X, §3(9)g<http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#X-3.9>
= ⅔ Both OR = ¾ One AND > ½ One
5 AND 9 6 AND 7 4 AND 10 I will include in my presentation the modification suggested by staff and the status of discussion. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich ________________________________ Von: Aikman-Scalese, Anne [mailto:AAikman@lrlaw.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Juni 2012 01:09 An: 'Angie Graves'; Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich Cc: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Betreff: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Council report Thanks Angie. This information was certainly in an earlier draft. In fact, it was part of the change I suggested because I didn't see the language about "only for a significant cause". Wolf-Ulrich and Marika, was the document sent out for consensus somehow different from the one that we had all previously been working on? Anne [cid:542211604@21062012-2ADB]Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel Lewis and Roca LLP * Suite 700 One South Church Avenue * Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 Tel (520) 629-4428 * Fax (520) 879-4725 AAikman@LRLaw.com<mailto:AAikman@LRLaw.com> * www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman<http://www.lewisandroca.com/Aikman> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message. ________________________________ From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of Angie Graves Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 12:40 PM To: KnobenW@telekom.de Cc: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Council report Hi All, For the Voting Thresholds for Delaying a PDP, I see no content in the presentation. From Marika, the current thresholds for terminating and initiating a PDP are as follows: * Terminate a PDP: Once initiated, and prior to the publication of a Final Report, the GNSO Council may terminate a PDP only for significant cause, upon a motion that passes with a GNSO Supermajority Vote in favor of termination. * Initiate a Policy Development Process ("PDP") Within Scope (as described in Annex A<http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#AnnexA>): requires an affirmative vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than two-thirds (2/3) of one House. A staff recommendation has been made but has not yet gained consensus in the group. Best regards, Angie On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:47 PM, <KnobenW@telekom.de<mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de>> wrote: All, attached is the draft report to the council on Saturday morning. Please feel free to comment/amend. I'd like to send it to Glen by tomorrow 19:00 UTC for posting. Best regards Wolf- ________________________________ For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com<http://www.lewisandroca.com/>. Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900 Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400 Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380 This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.
