hi Mikey, I dont think that we agreed yet. Avri was talking about what we had for previous election. even if we follow such process, I don't see how we can candidates by Monday. Best, Rafik 2014-03-14 22:27 GMT+09:00 Mike O'Connor <mike@haven2.com>:
works for me. it would be nice to have candidates named by Monday.
mikey
On Mar 14, 2014, at 8:17 AM, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> wrote:
On 14-Mar-14 08:47, Mike O'Connor wrote:
“same as last time” — one candidate per SG, Councilors vote per instruction. in the case of deadlock, it goes to the Ombudsman for mediation. treat this one as the default case?
This was only the case for the V-chair election a few years ago.
The Board seat election worked just fine.
There were two candidates one from each SG.
ballot 1: 6:7 ballot 2: 8:5
Winner declared.
Ballots were secret.
Which voter kept party discipline and which didn't is (somewhat) secret.
The method worked fine.
avri
_______________________________________________ Gnso-ncph-leadership mailing list Gnso-ncph-leadership@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ncph-leadership
PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
_______________________________________________ Gnso-ncph-leadership mailing list Gnso-ncph-leadership@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ncph-leadership