Please find the final draft, as sent to the Board, attached. David On 17 Jan 2015, at 7:41 am, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@hotmail.com> wrote:
I love the chained at birth analogy, Avri!
I was also looking for the language of the joint statement. Dave, Tony, do one of you have it? Or Bene, did staff capture it, perhaps, from the webex?
Sent from my iPad
On Jan 16, 2015, at 3:19 PM, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> wrote:
Hi,
(trying this list as it was mentioned in the house meeting - though i do not know if everyone there is on the list)
Can someone post the final copy of the letter to this list? Would like to forward it to the GNSO Review Team as well.
Something I sent to the GNSO Review Team list:
Another thing that was mentioned to me that we might want to explore. An unnamed member of the staff did wonder why we wait around on the review and on the SIC for revisions to the GNSO structure &c. Why, if we do our own review and figure out the changes we want to make, doesn't the GNSO just tell the the SIC what we want.
I had to answer that I did not know why we show so little initiative, and started to feel that maybe the GNSO is like one of those elephants that are chained at birth when they can't break the chain and remain chained as adults even though they could easily break the chains.
cheers
avri
_______________________________________________ Gnso-ncph-leadership mailing list Gnso-ncph-leadership@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ncph-leadership
Gnso-ncph-leadership mailing list Gnso-ncph-leadership@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ncph-leadership