What about our meeting letter to the Board on the GNSO review
Hi, We have not yet seen the letter posted. Do we have any reaction from the Board yet on the issue? avri
The board did not initially understand that it should be treated as correspondence. They do now, and it should appear on the board correspondence page soon. My understanding is that the board have definitely seen the letter, but do not yet have a response. Regards David On 3 Feb 2015, at 7:30 pm, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> wrote:
Hi,
We have not yet seen the letter posted.
Do we have any reaction from the Board yet on the issue?
avri
_______________________________________________ Gnso-ncph-leadership mailing list Gnso-ncph-leadership@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ncph-leadership
Amazing! Good it was followed up On. Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 4, 2015, at 12:30, David Cake <dave@difference.com.au> wrote:
The board did not initially understand that it should be treated as correspondence. They do now, and it should appear on the board correspondence page soon. My understanding is that the board have definitely seen the letter, but do not yet have a response.
Regards
David
On 3 Feb 2015, at 7:30 pm, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> wrote:
Hi,
We have not yet seen the letter posted.
Do we have any reaction from the Board yet on the issue?
avri
_______________________________________________ Gnso-ncph-leadership mailing list Gnso-ncph-leadership@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ncph-leadership
_______________________________________________ Gnso-ncph-leadership mailing list Gnso-ncph-leadership@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ncph-leadership
I spoke too soon - literally the next email I read gave me the address, though it took a few hours for it to actually show up. https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/correspondence-2012-09-24-en Note that the date is incorrect, an estimate by staff who were not on the initial recipient list, so it is currently listed as being received on the 20th although it was sent on the 16th (already a bit later than intended due to the vagaries of travel connectivity). Regards David On 5 Feb 2015, at 1:30 am, David Cake <dave@difference.com.au> wrote:
The board did not initially understand that it should be treated as correspondence. They do now, and it should appear on the board correspondence page soon. My understanding is that the board have definitely seen the letter, but do not yet have a response.
Regards
David
On 3 Feb 2015, at 7:30 pm, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> wrote:
Hi,
We have not yet seen the letter posted.
Do we have any reaction from the Board yet on the issue?
avri
_______________________________________________ Gnso-ncph-leadership mailing list Gnso-ncph-leadership@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ncph-leadership
participants (3)
-
Avri Doria -
David Cake -
Marilyn Cade