September 2016 - Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3

Actions/Discussion Notes: Work Track 3 Sub Team Meeting 27 September
by Julie Hedlund Sept. 27, 2016

Sept. 27, 2016

Dear Sub Team Members, Please see below the action items and discussion notes captured by staff from the meeting on 27 September. These high-level notes are designed to help Work Track Sub Team members navigate through the content of the call and are not a substitute for the recording. Please also see the recording on the meetings page at: https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/Work+Track+3+Meetings. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Action Items/Discussion Notes 27 September See the referenced documents on wiki at: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=60490779. 1. Proposed order of work Discussion Notes: · Start out with specific objections: a. Morality & Public Order; b. Legal Rights of Others; c. Confusingly Similar; and d. Community. · Then move to: a. applicant's Freedom of Expression; b. String similarity; and c. Accountability. · Agreed to adopt the above as the work order. 2. Timeline of the work Action Item: Karen Day and Jian Zhang will circulate a timeline to the list. Discussion Notes: · Karen Day: o Time needed for each issue would require an overlap in order to aim for end of April 2017. o Might spread ourselves thin to tackle more than one at the same time. May need to extend the duration of the calls. · Avri Doria: Support the view that we don't want to further split the group and working on parallel tracks. Think about starting one now, not as a separate track, but as another item to look at while other work (such as staff research) is ongoing. · Phil Buckingham: Need to look at overlaps with other work tracks and running topics/issues in parallel. · Karen Day: The April 28 date in the timeline, is that firm or is it a soft target? · Avri Doria: I think it is a soft target as a first projection. · Jeff Neuman: I am not comfortable calling it a soft target this far out. · Karen Day: Should we be dealing with geo names at the same time as WT2 is dealing with the reserved names list? · Phil Buckingham: That would make sense to us. · Karen Day: I will move forward this week in getting a timeline together to circulate for people to comment on the list. 3. Other business prior to starting the work Discussion Notes: a. Response to GNSO Council re: Board Letter: Update on the letter to the GNSO Council in response to the Board query on starting subsequent rounds sooner. · Jeff Neuman: The letter was sent on 25 September. The Council will discuss during its meeting on 29 September. The PDP WG will discuss in Hyderabad. b. Outreach to SOs/ACs for input into the Work Track 3 work area. Come to consensus on whether to do that now to get feedback earlier in the process? · Steve Chan: We should consider coordinating inquiries with all the work tracks. Hinders response rate if there are multiple inquiries. · Jeff Neuman: Prefer having specific questions to send out. Phil Buckingham agrees. · Avri Doria: Feel strong that we don't need to get this out now. All Sub Teams should be coming up with material questions, which we won't know until we've had discussions on the work items. 4. Objections – Review of Question, Mapping & Statistics Action Item: Staff will find the Rec 6 Group final report and see if there is anything that needs further discussion. Discussion Notes: a. Principle A -- New gTLDs must be introduced in an orderly, timely, and predictable way. · Jian Zhang: Is this broad enough to cover all discussions? Can we map different principles into different questions? · Objections: What principles can be applied? o Jeff Neuman: The way that the objections were implemented did they meet the criteria of the principles. If not what changes need to be made to meet that objective? Example: Morality and Public Order -- Leave this for the objection process in first round. How to carry out the objection process -- went through extensive discussion. o Phil Buckingham: Overriding is to enhance consumer choice, consumer trust and competition , innovation , but overriding stability security on the DNS. o Avri Doria: Still a reasonable principle, but may need to be reviewed based on other work ICANN is doing on these issues, such as the work in Accountability Work Stream 2 on the framework on human rights. o Jeff Neuman: Perhaps staff can come back to us on how Morality and Public Order was used in the last round and what the result was. When it was used, how it was used, and what was the result. Link to objection stats. o Avri Doria: Look at the Rec 6 group formed during the AGB timeframe talking through these issues. b. Legal right of others: · Karen Day: Since it was unsuccessful in the first round does that affect how it could be addressed in the next round? · Paul McGrady: This principle was not incorporated adequately in the AGB. Mismatch for the Paris Principle. Now we know it is defective at the fundamental level. Need to address this at the next round. · Jeff Neuman: Agree in part, but I think it was fairly effective in scary someone away from applying for something that was someone else's brand. Where it failed in some cases -- Ping, a trademark in golf didn't prevail because of the infringement analysis. Does need some fixes. · Karen Day: Look at where people think the improvements could be in the AGB: 3.2.2.2 Legal Rights Objection, 3.2.2.3 Limited Public Interest Objection · Jeff Neuman: One thing we can discuss is question 18 asked of all applicants -- an unscored part of the application and not carried forward into the registry agreement, "What is the purpose of your TLD?" · Paul McGrady: What is the effect of questioning; what is a second-level infringement of a top-level Domain Name -- how to monitor and enforce? Should applicants be bound by responses to Question 18? Raised a lot of thorny issues -- Pandora's box. · Jian: Who is the rights holder?

1 0

recording, Attendance & AC Chat for New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Sub Team – Track 3 – String Contention, Objections & Disputes held on Tuesday, 27 September 2016 at 15:00 UTC.
by Terri Agnew Sept. 27, 2016

Sept. 27, 2016

Dear All, Please find the attendance and recording of the call attached to this email and the AC Chat below for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Sub Team – Track 3 – String Contention, Objections & Disputes held on Tuesday, 27 September 2016 at 15:00 UTC. The recordings of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar<http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#nov> ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3 Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/GwSbAw Thank you. Kind regards, Terri ------------------------------- Adobe Connect chat transcript for 27 September 2016 Terri Agnew: Welcome to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Sub Team – Track 3 – String Contention, Objections & Disputes held onTuesday, 27 September 2016 at 15:00 UTC. Terri Agnew: wiki agenda page: https://community.icann.org/x/vBWsAw Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): The certificate issue was what I noted as well Terri Agnew: thanks Cheryl Jeff Neuman: There are some phone numbers on the Participant list. It would help our reccords if you cuold state which phone numbers are yours :) Terri Agnew: Please send me a private chat and I can also adjust the name on line regarding phone numbers. Julie Hedlund: @All: The document that is up is unsynced so you can move it yourself. Phil Buckingham: Hi i 'm in . No problems this end Jeff Neuman: I think this order makes sense Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): Fine with the order Phil Buckingham: no there is a problem getting into adobe Phil Buckingham: think we / you need to look at overlaps with other work tracks and running topics/ issues in parallel Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): makes sense to me Avri Phil Buckingham: that was our WT2 question . We are shooting / plannning on that date Phil Buckingham: yep that would make sense to us Steve Chan 2: Sunday Jeff Neuman: I prefer having specific questions to send out Phil Buckingham: tricky one . would be inclined to wait and accumulate questions Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): yes WT 4 also needs to ask AC/SO CT's input as well ... Best to coordinate Jeff Neuman: But lets document any questions as we go along Steve Chan 2: I think it might be problematic if the request for input were to be 4x as long as CC1 (to account for all of the WTs) avri: optimally i think sending out qustiosn from all at one time is optimal; avri: well that was overly redundanly said Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): But for WT4 we need that feedback early in our program avri: (referring to my my remark in case there is doubt) Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): :-) avri: if someone needs to go before others are ready, then so be it. lets talk in our coordination meeting Phil Buckingham: I guess the overiding is to enhance consumer choice, consumer trust and competition , innovation , but overriding stability security on the DNS Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): Agree Phil Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): good point to watch Avri yes Phil Buckingham: What a question ! Jeff Neuman: Perhaps staff can come back to us on how Morality and Public Order was used in the last round and what the result was Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): yup Avri correct a few ALAC in it as well Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): :-) Steve Chan 2: We'll work on tracking it down Paul McGrady: I'm having trouble seeing this full chart. Is it added to the Wiki? avri: i might be able to find it as well Paul McGrady: Thanks! Julie Hedlund: @Paul: Yes it is on the wiki. I'll put in the link. Julie Hedlund: Here it is: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/60490779/SubProWT3_ObjStat…. Julie Hedlund: @Karen: Yes. Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): indeed Jeff Nathaniel Edwards: Exception where Dish Network applied for .direct (DirecTV) Phil Buckingham: ie caravan as an example generic or brand . Prevailed as a .brand Paul McGrady: So long as we are going to try to improve it, I will leave Jeff in his optimism. Jeff Neuman: Thanks :) Phil Buckingham: ++++++1 Jefff Phil Buckingham: Jeff - sorry Phil Buckingham: Q18 what is material especially re business model / plan ( five years after application ! + 1 paul - thorny issues Jeff Neuman: I like Pandora Boxes avri: The Rec 6 CWG final report: https://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/new-gtlds/report-rec6-cwg-21sep10-en.pdf avri: the CWG charter: https://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/new-gtlds/new-gtld-final-recommendations-6… Greg Shatan: UDHR is not a legal right. avri: also this on Rec 6: https://community.icann.org/display/ArW/Rec+6+CWG-Morality+and+Public+Order Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): Thanks Karen, Thanks everyone... Good call ... Talk again soon... Paul McGrady: Agree! great call Karen. Thank you! Terri Agnew: The next call for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Sub Team – Track 3 – String Contention, Objections & Disputes will take place on Tuesday, 11 October 2016 at 20:00 UTC. Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): those links go to the wiki as well I assume avri: thanks Karen, good call. congrat on your first Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): Bye avri: bye Phil Buckingham: great job Karen Steve Chan 2: @CLO, yes, we'll move the links there

1 0

Sub Pro WT3 Sept 27th Meeting - Agenda & Materials
by Karen Day Sept. 26, 2016

Sept. 26, 2016

Dear all, We are scheduled to have the next meeting of our WT3 team on Tuesday, September 27th at 15:00 UTC. In advance of our meeting I have gathered a number of materials that I believe will be relevant to our work. Among these are the mapping document (GNSORec08) and objection statistics (ObjStat) requested from staff on the last call. Also, you will find, a document containing all of the relevant principals, guidance and recommendations for our work areas, a proposed order in which we could tackle our work and finally a copy of AGB Module 3. In future I hope that we can have these available on the wiki prior to meetings for your to access and review, however due to the lateness of my preparations this week, I have taken the liberty of creating a Dropbox folder to house the documents for you to download, rather than blowing up your email with a bunch of attachments. https://www.dropbox.com/l/scl/AAB-nOgO2Jxhnh6WO-triC_xtaG-lQukEwo If you have any problems accessing the folder, please feel free to contact me directly on Monday. Our agenda, subject to your comments at the beginning of the call, will be as follows: 1. Welcome & Business regarding roll call and recording – Staff 2. SOI Updates? 3. Proposed Order of Work 4. Proposed Timeline of Work 5. AOB prior to Work Kickoff 6. Objections – Review of Question, Mapping & Statistics 7. Recap of Action Items & Confirmation of next call schedule I look forward to speaking with you all on Tuesday. Best regards, Karen ____________________________ Karen L. Day, NCCP ACP Registry Operations Manager Tel: + 1 919-531-6016 ▪ Mobile: + 1 919-599-4356 ▪ karen.day(a)sas.com SAS Institute Inc.▪ SAS Campus Drive ▪ Cary, NC 27513 USA www.sas.com [S285-sas100K-TPTK40K-vert]

2 1

Actions/Discussion Notes: Work Track 3 SubTeam Meeting 13 September
by Steve Chan Sept. 13, 2016

Sept. 13, 2016

Dear WT3 members, Please see below the action items and discussion notes captured by staff from the meeting on 13 September. These high-level notes are designed to help Work Track 3 Sub Team members navigate through the content of the call. Please also see the recording on the meetings page at: https://community.icann.org/x/vQ2bAw. Best, Steve Notes/Action Items: 3. No objections to Karen Day as the second co-chair. 4. Avri - full group will discuss letter from the ICANN Board as a priority, ahead of resuming consideration of CC1 input. 5. Jian - Meeting times: initial plan is to rotate between 0300, 1500, 2000 UTC. Meeting frequency: Group will meet every 2 weeks, at least initially. Task Prioritization: String similarity - how closely related is the IDN subject? Jeff - String similarity should take place before string contention. String contention might not exist depending upon allocation method (e.g., first come first served) Objections: staff to determine how many objections filed (type, outcomes) Working Methods: Mike Rodenbaugh - should we be reviewing the existing principles and recommendations or should the time be spent on considering the subjects. Context matters. Jeff - Map the objections to principles/recommendations and determine if the purpose was met Jian - Difference of opinions on relationship between principles to recommendations 7. ACTION ITEMS · WG Members - Consider how the Board letter impacts the work plan of this WT. · Staff - Map principles/recommendations to objection grounds · Staff - Gather statistics for objections · Staff - Investigate what existing reports might exist regarding objections (and other subjects for that matter). Steven Chan  Sr. Policy Manager   ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536  steve.chan(a)icann.org direct: +1.310.301.3886  mobile: +1.310.339.4410 tel: +1.310.301.5800 fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO http://gnso.icann.org/en/

1 0

recording, Attendance & AC Chat for New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Sub Team – Track 3 – String Contention, Objections & Disputes held on Tuesday, 13 September 2016 at 03:00 UTC.
by Terri Agnew Sept. 13, 2016

Sept. 13, 2016

Dear All, Please find the attendance and recording of the call attached to this email and the AC Chat below for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Sub Team – Track 3 – String Contention, Objections & Disputes held on Tuesday, 13 September 2016 at 03:00 UTC. The recordings of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar<http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#nov> ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3 Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/GwSbAw Thank you. Kind regards, Terri ------------------------------- Adobe Connect chat transcript for 13 September 2016 Terri Agnew:Welcome to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Sub Team – Track 3 – String Contention, Objections & Disputes held onTuesday, 13 September 2016 at 03:00 UTC Terri Agnew:wiki agenda page: https://community.icann.org/x/uRWsAw Jeff Neuman:we can hear you Jeff Neuman:Cheryl....whats for lunch today Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):it was a cheese toasty with green tomatoe pickle Jeff (on home made 9 grain bread :-) Jeff Neuman:looks good Jeff Neuman:Excited to have Karen join us Steve Chan:Avri, I can hear you, but it's pretty quiet. Jeff Neuman:much Jeff Neuman:I will forward that letter to the full WG shortly (in the next 12-24 hours) Jeff Neuman:I am good Jeff Neuman:you did a good job avri Jeff Neuman:Given the attendance, at first we should rotate Mike Rodenbaugh:I think we must rotate,, to be fair to everyone Jeff Neuman:Its a bad time for Europeans Jeff Neuman:And I know a bunch a Europeans on this group that want to participate Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):They will do Mike Rodenbaugh:fine with me Jeff Neuman:Lets keep these to avoid duplication with other working groups Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):rotation is fine with me, too. Jeff Neuman:2 weeks to start Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):fortnightly (at this stage) Mike Rodenbaugh:every two weeks,. maybe we can go faster as we get later in the work Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):agree with every 2 weeks. Steve Chan:https://community.icann.org/x/GwSbAw Jeff Neuman:Those are all references to the original 2007 policy FYI Mike Rodenbaugh:sorry, what is the question? Jeff Neuman:Prioritization amongst the topics Jeff Neuman:So we have Objections as one topic, string contention (which includes CPE) is another Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Agree Mike Mike Rodenbaugh:String contention also includes auctions? Jeff Neuman:We could go in chronological order of the application process...that would be string similarity first..... Jeff Neuman:We could look at plurals vs. singulars Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):We should YES Jeff Neuman:Sorry...i meant string similarity Jeff Neuman:not contentions....sorry Mike Rodenbaugh:string contention is String Similarity, and Auctions? or is there anything else? Jeff Neuman:So we can do (1) String Similarity, (2) Objections, (3) String contentions (which will dpend on how we choose to accept applications) Steve Chan:FYI, the subjects identified as high interest by the CCT-RT are string similarity, objections, and community applications...to the extent that changes our work plan. Mike Rodenbaugh:objections are limited public interest, community, string similarity and legal rights of others (LRO), right? Jeff Neuman:If we go forward with just first-come first served acceptancce of TLD applications, there would be no String Contention Mike Rodenbaugh:then we should not waste our time.... and we should do Objections first and see what happens with rounds v. FCFS? Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):Is Independent Objector in this WT or WT2? Jeff Neuman:This one Mike Rodenbaugh:makes sense since IO could bring two types of objections Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):SO some order in resolving certisn issues needs to be applied then Jeff?? Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):Agree with Mike that we should do objections first, but for slightly different reason String confusion objection work could inform the string similarity/contention work so suggest doing the objection first. Jeff Neuman:@Kristina - I would be good with that Jeff Neuman:and that makes sense Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):With our luck, we'd decide to do FCFS, skip string contention, and then 2 applicants file at the same tie for the same string. :-( Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):time Jeff Neuman:One thing that we may want staff to do is to deliver a report to us on all of the objections filed (number of each type of objection and who prevailed) Jeff Neuman:We also need to make sure under objections that we cover GAC Early Warnings and GAC Objections Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):+1 Jeff. That type of report would be very useful. I think it would also be helpful for the report to include information on the objections for which the outcome was the subject of an accountability mechanism (which could be one metric for identifying "problems" with an objection category as implemented) Steve Chan:Principle G: The string evaluation process must not infringe the applicant's freedom of expression rights that are protected under internationally recognized principles of law. Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):I'd add Principle A: New generic top-level domains (gTLDs) must be introduced in an orderly, timely and predictable way. Jeff Neuman:That is Mike Rodenbaugh talking Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):Agree with Mike. But, I do think we should review the Principles and Recommendations as a yardstick for the objection (etc) implementation Mike Rodenbaugh:agree with Kristina... Principle A is critical, and has not been implemented so well Jeff Neuman:I think a number of principles relate to the objections Jeff Neuman:but its been a while since we looked at them Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):sorry. Super loud construction so can't come off mute right now. Jeff Neuman:And I wil lforward that letter to the full group ASAP Mike Rodenbaugh:all sounds good to me. Thanks Jian for stepping up to help lead this group! We will have a lot of work to do. Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):indeed we do Mike Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):thanks Jian Jeff Neuman:Good job Jian! Terri Agnew:The next New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Sub Team – Track 3 – String Contention, Objections & Disputes will take place on Tuesday, 27 September 2016 at 15:00 UTC, invite will be sent shortly. Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):I have a request: Would it be possible for staff to pull together a list of the work that's been done on these categories (objection reports, etc.)? Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):To be clear, I'm not asking for a new report - just a list of what already exists Steve Chan:@Kristina, anything specific you might be looking for? Perhaps who the work might have been done by? Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):@Steve: Not really. I seem to recall that WIPO did an LRO report. There's the staff implementation report. I suspect that there are others. Terri Agnew:GNSO calls including track calls are also on the GNSO Calendars: https://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar Avri Doria:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qwr41BesyvDQBnqF_gBQlHfJlRkOG… Steve Chan:@Kristina, does the last action item capture your request? Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):As it seems my request for call details was a problem, I apologize - and note that I didn't join the WT until after the call details were sent. Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):@Steve: yes, thank you! Avri Doria:put this one in your bookmarks Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Thanks Jian, thanks everyone talk again soon... Bye for now then... Sorry I have been mainly mute but I an n 2 meetings at once at the moment ... Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):Thanks, Jian. Great job on leading your first call! Avri Doria:Thanks.

1 0

Proposed agenda for WT3 meeting 13th Sep
by Jian Chang Sept. 13, 2016

Sept. 13, 2016

Dear all WT3 participants, As you might have known, the second metting of Work Track 3 (String Contention / Objections & Disputes) is scheduled for *Tuesday, 13 September 2016 at 3:00 UTC*. You should have all received an invitation by now.The meeting will last one hour. This will be the first meeting that I will be heading, and also it's the first time for me to lead a PDP discussion. I view it as an valuable learning experience for me. Should you have any questions or concerns re how thing going and how we can improve, please feel free to contact me and/or other co-chairs. Karen Day has volunteered to be co-chair and has circulated her SOI. I appreciate her standing up and look forward to working with her. But before that, I believe our group needs to ratify her leadership, and we will have a few minutes for this issue. FYI, below is the proposed agenda for tomorrow meeting. 1. Review agenda 2. Statement of Interest (SOIs) updates 3. Karen Day as the co-chair of WT3-Avri/Jeff 4. WG activities updates-Avri/Jeff 5. WT3 meeting times, working methods and task prioritization 6. Review of Principle G-- freedom of expression rights 7. Action points for next call 8. AOB -if have time Please let me know if you have any problems with this agenda. Kind regards, Jian Zhang jczhang(a)knet.cn

2 1

Details of 13 September meeting
by Rosette, Kristina Sept. 13, 2016

Sept. 13, 2016

Hi, Would someone please send me the details of the 13 September meeting? I can't find them. Thank you! K Kristina Rosette Sr. Corp Counsel - IP, Domains | Amazon | 206.740.8191 rosettek(a)amazon.com<mailto:rosettek@amazon.com>

3 3

WT3 Co-chair
by Karen Day Sept. 9, 2016

Sept. 9, 2016

Hi Avri & everyone, If the position is still open and the group would like, I would be willing to volunteer to co-chair WT3 with Jian. My SOI is available at https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Karen+L.+Day+SOI. My background is in intellectual property I facilitated three successful applications in the 2012 round for my company. This is however, my first direct participation in an ICANN PDP WG. I have a prior commitment for the next WT-3 meeting(9-12/13-16), but I will be available thereafter for the duration project. Best regards, Karen Karen L. Day, NCCP ACP ?Registry Operations Manager SAS Institute Inc. Direct Dial: 919-531-6016

6 5

Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3] just need another co-leader
by avri doria Sept. 1, 2016

Sept. 1, 2016

Hi Liz, Not sure what you are asking. avri On 01-Sep-16 14:06, liz williams wrote: > Hello there > > I am happy to help out. Just let me know what you’d like me to do > with the existing schedule. > > Liz >> On 1 Sep 2016, at 19:03, avri doria <avri(a)apc.org >> <mailto:avri@apc.org>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Wanted to remind the group participants: >> >> While Jian Zhang volunteered during our meeting, she only volunteered as >> a co-leader. >> >> We therefore still need another volunteer co-leader. >> >> Any takers. >> >> Thanks >> >> avri >> >> >> >> --- >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >> https://www.avast.com/antivirus >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3 mailing list >> Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3(a)icann.org >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3 > > *…* > * > * > *Dr Liz Williams* > *Senior Advisor* > *Towerhouse LLP > 10 Fitzroy Square* > > *London W1T 5HP > United Kingdom*** > > *Tel: +44 (0) 20 7874 1850* > *Mob: +44 (0) 7824 877757* > * * > > * > > > > * > *Web: *_www.towerhouse.co.uk_ <http://www.towerhouse.co.uk/> > _www.pierstone.com_ <http://www.pierstone.com/>** > *Twitter*: @towerhouseLLP** > > > *Towerhouse LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in > England and Wales (partnership number OC 330953) and is a firm of > Solicitors regulated by Solicitors’ Regulation Authority* > > *THIS EMAIL AND ITS CONTENTS ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND MAY BE LEGALLY > PRIVILEGED. * *THIS EMAIL MAY BE RELIED UPON ONLY BY THE INTENDED > RECIPIENT. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, PLEASE NOTIFY US > AND DESTROY THIS EMAIL*** > >

1 0

just need another co-leader
by avri doria Sept. 1, 2016

Sept. 1, 2016

Hi, Wanted to remind the group participants: While Jian Zhang volunteered during our meeting, she only volunteered as a co-leader. We therefore still need another volunteer co-leader. Any takers. Thanks avri --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

1 0