Agree with Peter. Best regards, Katrin DOTZON GmbH - digital identities for tomorrow Akazienstrasse 28 10823 Berlin Deutschland - Germany Tel: +49 30 49802722 Fax: +49 30 49802727 Mobile: +49 173 2019240 ohlmer@dotzon.consulting<mailto:ohlmer@dotzon.consulting> www.dotzon.consulting<http://www.dotzon.consulting> DOTZON GmbH Registergericht: Amtsgericht Berlin-Charlottenburg, HRB 118598 Geschäftsführer: Katrin Ohlmer Sitz der Gesellschaft: Akazienstrasse 28, 10823 Berlin Von: Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5-bounces@icann.org] Im Auftrag von Peter Van Roste Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Januar 2018 17:19 An: Icann Gnso Newgtld Wg Wt5 <Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org> Betreff: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Conclusion of CWG-UCTN on 2-character codes Not responding to anyone in particular, but a suggestion to all: We are still trying to agree on what ‘geographic terms’ are. As mentioned in the chat yesterday, I believe this is part of the scoping of the exercise and will help us later on to determine on which names we want to suggest policy. Discussing strings that are unlikely to be ever considered geographic names is a bit pointless. Engaging at this stage in a policy discussion seems premature (even though it is undoubtedly more interesting). The descriptions as used in the 2012 AGB (see Martin’s email dd 08/01 and as presented on the call yesterday) seem workable to me. Has anyone come up with a name that s/he considers to be a geographic name that does not fit? Kind Regards, Peter