Dear All Thank you very much for the message I have sent some amendments to the document which I can not find any trace of those changes ? Why? I have noted that someone saying that the concept of Cross Community Working Group to Geo Name is outside the mandate Why? We gave not debated that issue Pls note that GAC in its conditions of participation referred to that concept It is therefore inappropriate that someone’s view dominate the requested conditions without being debated Regards Kavouss Sent from my iPhone
On 18 Dec 2017, at 12:46, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org> wrote:
Dear Work Track 5 members,
The next Work Track 5 call is scheduled for Wednesday 20 December at 20:00 UTC for 90 minutes.
During this call, the Work Track will review the attached update to the draft Terms of Reference, also available as a Google Doc here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1J8iuUrfqCaVKdzeRN01vRhZAjb8KABRp_NwdDwkQ... . In this version, the leadership team sought to integrate and reconcile the feedback received from WT members to produce a ‘clean’ draft that is easier to navigate. At the beginning of the document, you will find overarching principles used in this review and revision process.
Please review this document and join the call prepared to discuss the revised language.
Kind regards, Emily
Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas@icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976
<Work Track 5 Terms of Reference 18 Dec 2017.pdf> <Work Track 5 Terms of Reference 18 Dec 2017.docx> _______________________________________________ Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5