- Gnso-newgtld-wg - lists.icann.org

Actions/Discussion Notes: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG 08 August 2016
by Julie Hedlund Aug. 8, 2016

Aug. 8, 2016

Dear WG Members, Please see below the action items and discussion notes captured by staff from the meeting on 08 August. These high-level notes are designed to help PDP WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant as a substitute for the transcript. The MP3, transcript, and chat are provided separately and are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/1.+WG+Meetings. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Actions/Discussion Notes: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Meeting, 08 August 2016 1. Work Track (Sub Team) Planning – initial meetings in August Action Items: Invites have been sent out. The schedule is being finalized. 2. CC1/Overarching Issues Preliminary Findings (https://docs.google.com/document/d/16Sd6mpO5MqHl7BHOl9HBENDgUvcqQ04QumbVNfV…) a. Updates on CC1 comments: ALAC asked for an extension to mid-August. IPC indicated they need a few more days. BC said it will be forthcoming. Action Items: 1) GNSO Council Liaison, Paul McGrady, will remind Councilors of the need for participation from their representatives on the PDP WG calls. 2) Staff will update the Google document based on this discussion and it will be listed as a "preliminary draft". (DONE – See: https://docs.google.com/document/d/16Sd6mpO5MqHl7BHOl9HBENDgUvcqQ04QumbVNfV…) 3) PDP WG members should feel free to comment directly in the Google Doc. b. Draft Findings and Recommendations: 1) Additional new gTLDs in the future – Anticipated outcome(s): No changes to current text. 2) Categorization or differentiation of gTLDs – Anticipated outcome(s): Add a bullet that there is agreement that the WG should create, in the overarching issues process, the set of candidate categories to discuss in the groups -- such as the AGB plus de facto ones. Notes: · Decide fairly soon on a draft set of categories. · Different categories could also tie in to application fees. · RySG Comments: Accepting original two categories and the two that were added. No discussion in the RySG comments on how to satisfy GAC comments about types of strings. · Consider doing away with "community" as a category in the future due to its arbitrariness. · How to address de facto categories based on GAC advice (such as "closed generic"). Could be a legal issue (work track 2) as well as for "regulated" and "highly regulated". Guidance to applicants on allowing or not. · Does every different attribute result in a different category? 3) Future new gTLDs assessed in "rounds" Anticipated outcome(s): Suggested additional bullets: The WG agreed that there should be an ongoing process that is clearly defined, with the understanding that there may be one or two rounds. The WG further agreed that following these preliminary rounds the process will go to a steady state of first come, first served. 4) Predictability should be maintained or enhanced without sacrificing flexibility – Anticipated outcome(s): No changes to current text. 5) Community engagement in new gTLD application processes -- Anticipated outcome(s): No changes to current text. Notes: Suggestion (Paul McGrady/IPC): Only those who participated in the PDP could suggest a change. Question (Donna Austin, RySG): How to encourage people who do have an interest in the program to get engaged early? 6) Limiting applications in total and/or per entity during an application window -- Anticipated outcome(s): No changes to current text.

1 0

CC1 Comments Received by 08 August
by Julie Hedlund Aug. 8, 2016

Aug. 8, 2016

Dear PDP Working Group members, Please see the wiki at https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=59645660 where the CC1 Comments received thus far are listed. We have received comments from the GAC on 29 July and most recently the Registry Stakeholder Group on 05 August (attached). The ccNSO pointed to a previous comment on the issues at: http://ccnso.icann.org/about/disspain-to-dengate-thrush-21nov09-en.pdf. The ALAC has asked for an extension to mid-August. If you know of any other comments that we may have missed, please let us know. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

1 0

Proposed Agenda
by Emily Barabas Aug. 5, 2016

Aug. 5, 2016

Dear Working Group members, Below, please find the proposed agenda for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG meeting scheduled for Monday, August 8 at 16:00 UTC: 1. Welcome/Review Agenda 2. SOIs 3. Work Track (Sub Team) Planning – initial meetings in August 4. CC1/Overarching Issues Preliminary Findings continued (https://docs.google.com/document/d/16Sd6mpO5MqHl7BHOl9HBENDgUvcqQ04QumbVNfV…) 5. Accreditation Programs continued 6. AOB If you require a dial-out or will be an apology please email gnso-secs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>. Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas | Policy Specialist ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976

1 0

Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda
by Jian C.Zhang Aug. 3, 2016

Aug. 3, 2016

What? Isn't it supposed to start at 1300 UTC? That's 2300 Beijing time. Did you change the time and failed to notify the participants? Jian-Chuan Chang Sr. Research Fellow KNETCo. Ltd. Tel: +86-10-8218-4187 Fax: +86-10-6250-6502Email: jczhang(a)knet.cn ----- 原邮件内容 ----- 发件人: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc(a)gmail.com> 收件人: "Jian C.Zhang" <jczhang(a)knet.cn> 抄送: Steve Chan <steve.chan(a)icann.org>, "gnso-newgtld-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg(a)icann.org> 发送时间:Mon, 1 Aug 2016 11:11:09 -0400 主题:Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda The called commenced about 2 hours ago and ended about 30 minutes ago. On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Jian C.Zhang<jczhang(a)knet.cn>wrote: Hi, Chan, could you share the link of adobe connect? I have entered the newgtld,but seems wrong. Jian-Chuan Chang Sr. Research Fellow KNETCo. Ltd. Tel:+86-10-8218-4187 Fax:+86-10-6250-6502Email:jczhang@knet.cn ----- 原邮件内容 ----- 发件人: Steve Chan <steve.chan(a)icann.org> 收件人: "gnso-newgtld-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg(a)icann.org> 发送时间:Fri, 29 Jul 2016 18:25:34 +0000 主题:[Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda Dear WG Members, Below, please find the proposed agenda for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG meeting scheduled for Monday, 1 August 2016 at 1300 UTC. 1. Welcome/Review Agenda 2. SOIs 3. Work Track (Sub Team) discussion and planning 4. Competition, Consumer Trust & Consumer Choice Review Team (CCT-RT) – Possible input to their draft applicant survey (if possible, please review the attached document before the WG meeting) with CCT-RT Chair Jonathan Zuck 5. CC1/Overarching Issues Preliminary Findings (https://docs.google.com/document/d/16Sd6mpO5MqHl7BHOl9HBENDgUvcqQ04QumbVNfV…) 6. Accreditation Programs cont. 7. AOB Best, Steven Chan  Sr. Policy Manager   ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536  steve.chan(a)icann.org direct: +1.310.301.3886  mobile:+1.310.339.4410 tel:+1.310.301.5800 fax:+1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO http://gnso.icann.org/en/ _______________________________________________ Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list Gnso-newgtld-wg(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg

6 6

Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda
by Alan Greenberg Aug. 3, 2016

Aug. 3, 2016

I found https://www.icann.org/announcements/backend-providers-certification-04feb08… which documents that Jeff is not dreaming about Interisle being involved (see middle of page 3), but could not locate any final report in the web site. Alan At 03/08/2016 04:01 PM, Jeff Neuman wrote: >Kurt, > >Thanks for this paper. I recall that one of the major reasons we >did not go down the accreditation program for the 2012 round was >also the time it would take to establish the criteria and lack of a >definition of what we were actually accrediting (as a 10,000 domain >name registry may not have the same requirements as a 10,000,000 >name registry). I do not recall talking about how it would lead to >a lack of diversity, but that was in 2008 or 2009. > >I also remembered you hired Lyman Chapin and Interisle to help study >the issue. I have reached out to him about getting this information >but he told me that everything he had was in ICANN's possession. Do >you happen to recall where that information Is and whether we can >get access to those materials. > >I will get a link to this article put up on the Wiki under this issue. > >Thanks again! > >Jeffrey J. Neuman >Senior Vice President |Valideus USA | Com Laude USA >1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 600 >Mclean, VA 22102, United States >E: <mailto:jeff.neuman@valideus.com>jeff.neuman(a)valideus.com or ><mailto:jeff.neuman@comlaude.com>jeff.neuman(a)comlaude.com >T: +1.703.635.7514 >M: +1.202.549.5079 >@Jintlaw > > >From: gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces(a)icann.org >[mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Kurt Pritz >Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 3:08 PM >To: gnso-newgtld-wg(a)icann.org >Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda > >Hi Everyone: > >There has been some discussion around an accreditation program for >Registry Service Providers. I started to put down some thoughts on >it and especially on reasons for creating such a program. Those >thoughts developed into the attached paper. For reasons stated in >the paper, I think the discussion about such a program should occur >sooner rather than later - whether it be in this group or some other group. > >The paper is also posted on CircleID: ><http://www.circleid.com/posts/20160803_why_registry_service_providers_shoul…>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20160803_why_registry_service_providers_shoul… > > >Thanks in advance to anyone who takes time to read and consider it. >I'd be pleased to answer questions, either via email or in a meeting. > >Best regards, > >Kurt > > >________________ >Kurt Pritz ><mailto:kurt@kjpritz.com>kurt(a)kjpritz.com >+1.310.400.4184 >Skype: kjpritz > > > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >Content-Disposition: inline >X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: > >1;DM5PR03MB2714;9:EEIK+ArM5S5b3BuUQG9jUM3aRC/zzWKjANbGk8+63PzX8M9syqJSLTVr0uEg6fh/XV/X2T9EGqQQVJLdyFudo2GuZ21ufbXm0davVJDeNw+hR/F8F/x6mTu2CMcN5OUE4bUj0n0szLBhoMtxeSY4JH6j/vDHiPotJVZtPD6/883fZ6QdFj40JgzlVDr+SsaWb5yMU4itUte6UoRfYWxLOQ== > >_______________________________________________ >Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list >Gnso-newgtld-wg(a)icann.org >https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg

2 1

Proposed Agenda
by Steve Chan Aug. 1, 2016

Aug. 1, 2016

Dear WG Members, Below, please find the proposed agenda for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG meeting scheduled for Monday, 1 August 2016 at 1300 UTC. 1. Welcome/Review Agenda 2. SOIs 3. Work Track (Sub Team) discussion and planning 4. Competition, Consumer Trust & Consumer Choice Review Team (CCT-RT) – Possible input to their draft applicant survey (if possible, please review the attached document before the WG meeting) with CCT-RT Chair Jonathan Zuck 5. CC1/Overarching Issues Preliminary Findings (https://docs.google.com/document/d/16Sd6mpO5MqHl7BHOl9HBENDgUvcqQ04QumbVNfV…) 6. Accreditation Programs cont. 7. AOB Best, Steven Chan  Sr. Policy Manager   ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536  steve.chan(a)icann.org direct: +1.310.301.3886  mobile: +1.310.339.4410 tel: +1.310.301.5800 fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO http://gnso.icann.org/en/

5 4

Actions/Discussion Notes: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG 1 August 2016
by Steve Chan Aug. 1, 2016

Aug. 1, 2016

Dear WG Members, Please see below the action items and discussion notes captured by staff from the meeting on 1 August. These high-level notes are designed to help PDP WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant as a substitute for the transcript. The MP3, transcript, and chat are provided separately and are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/1.+WG+Meetings. Best, Steve Actions/Discussion Notes: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Meeting, 1 August 2016 3. Work Track (Sub Team) discussion and planning Action Items: 1. Staff to send initial meeting invites, will try to avoid conflicts with CWG-IANA, CCWG-WS2, and other major community efforts 4. Competition, Consumer Trust & Consumer Choice Review Team (CCT-RT) – Possible input to their draft applicant survey (if possible, please review the attached document before the WG meeting) with CCT-RT Chair Jonathan Zuck Action Items: 1. Jeff to provide draft text for question related to NGPC changes to New gTLD Program. 2. Suggestions for further questions can be sent to input-to-cctrt(a)icann.org (as opposed to cctrt-staff(a)icann.org, which was mentioned on the WG call) - (by Friday 5 August) 5. CC1/Overarching Issues Preliminary Findings (https://docs.google.com/document/d/16Sd6mpO5MqHl7BHOl9HBENDgUvcqQ04QumbVNfV…) Notes: 1. WG will review in detail on the call next week using community comments as the basis WG members to try to get their SG/C comments in (if any) by Friday 5 August 6. Accreditation Programs cont. Action Items: 1. WG members to provide feedback on advisability of doing the Accreditation Program work now, and any questions/suggestions for its scope Steven Chan  Sr. Policy Manager   ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536  steve.chan(a)icann.org direct: +1.310.301.3886  mobile: +1.310.339.4410 tel: +1.310.301.5800 fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO http://gnso.icann.org/en/

1 0

Mp3, Attendance & AC Chat for New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG 01 August 2016 13:00 UTC
by Michelle DeSmyter Aug. 1, 2016

Aug. 1, 2016

Dear All, Please find the attendance of the call attached to this email and the MP3 recording below for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group call held on Monday, 1 August 2016 at 13:00 UTC. MP3: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-01aug16-en.mp3 <http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-01aug16-en.mp3> <http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-16may16-en.mp3> <http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-09may16-en.mp3http://a…> The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar<http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#nov> ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/ Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/-AibAw Thank you. Kind regards, Michelle DeSmyter ------------------------------- Adobe Connect chat transcript for Monday, 1 August 2016 Michelle DeSmyter:Dear All, Welcome to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group, Monday, 01 August 2016 13:00 UTC. Rubens Kuhl:Hello @ll; I won't be able to join the audio bridge or do AC audio today. Michelle DeSmyter:Thanks so much Rubens! Jeff Neuman:hello all Kavouss Arasteh:01 August is inspired by the date of the Federal Charter of 1291, Pacte du Grutli, placed in "early August",when "three Alpine cantons swore the oath of confederation" (Schwyz, Uri and Unterwalden), an action which later came to be regarded as the foundation of Switzerland 1 August is celebrated each year with paper lantern parades, bonfires, hanging strings of Swiss flags, fireworks and competitive rifle shooting matches I congratulate our Swiss colleagues on their National Day Steve Chan:CCT-RT draft applicant survey available here: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/58727456/Applicant%20surve… Rubens Kuhl:"Chief Janitor" Jeff Neuman:Nothing to add from me Kavouss Arasteh:Some of us are involved in WS2 of CCWG..Is it possible to make arrangements with the team leaders of those 9 sub group to avoid, to the extent possible, overlapping Susan Payne:If there are 2 subgroup calls in the same week could you please consider not having them both at 22:00 UTC. That is a pretty unsatisfactory time for Europe, it would be nice not to have more than one call at that time if there is anyone trying to join both. But in any event it seems sensible to look at location of participants when setting times Katrin Ohlmer | DOTZON:I received the invites via mail Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):2 Distibution lists per topic??? Steve Chan:I will double check to see if members have already been added Katrin Ohlmer | DOTZON:per work track Steve Chan:Oh, thank you Katrin! VANDA:SORRY TO ENTER LATE- LOST THE EMAIL WITH THE ADOBE CONNECT. Steve Chan:@Cheryl, one is for the mailing list, the other is for the meeting notifications, just like other working groups Kavouss Arasteh:I am involved in Jurisdiction, Human rights for which I request to avoid overlapping Jeff Neuman:Someone with an open line is typing really loudly Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):OK Steve I tend t respond to meeting invites on auto Kavouss Arasteh:NO AUDIO Karen Day (SAS):only hearing typing Kavouss Arasteh:I am disconnected Dietmar Lenden - Validues Ltd:we cannot hear Agri Kavouss Arasteh:ok Dietmar Lenden - Validues Ltd:Avri Dietmar Lenden - Validues Ltd:yes Rubens Kuhl:On PICs, we actually had 3 types: mandatory(agreement baseline), mandatory-voluntary (GAC Advice) and actual voluntary PICs... Kavouss Arasteh:Avri, I can not clearly hear you . It seems you are far from mic. Steve Chan:The document should already be un-synced and you should have scroll control. Kavouss Arasteh:I have a question, To whom these questionaire is addressed? Kavouss Arasteh:How it is distributed? Kavouss Arasteh:Howmuch time is dforeseen for reply Kavouss Arasteh:WHO WILL REVIEW THE ANSWER? Avri Doria:the CCT I would assume Kavouss Arasteh:It is important to put a proper order of questions ,I mean order of appearance Eleeza Agopian:@Kavouss: It will be distributed via email to all new gTLD applicants. Eleeza Agopian:Re: time. We anticipate this to be a 15-min survey. We'll put it out to field for at least 2 weeks. Eleeza Agopian:The contacts for the survey are those who were listed in the applications. Kavouss Arasteh:Question 10 should be put before question 9 Donna Austin, Neustar:I can hear Avri just fine. Susan Payne:@Avri - I think you are clearer now Quoc Pham:Hi, should this also include questions related to IDNs? Donna Austin, Neustar:Can the person who is typing please mute Kavouss Arasteh:q 14, what do we mean by " do you suggest another means" Berry Cobb:Kavouss, can you please mute your mic? We hear your typing. Karen Day (SAS):Could the person typing please mute? Kavouss Arasteh:such as what? VANDA:will help if we contact the applicants we know and explain to them why this is relevant to answer? Klaus Stoll:Could the person typing please stop or mute! Quoc Pham:such as the process in deciding which languages they wanted to include in their TLD to support Quoc Pham:their experience with IDNs and other others which impact them e.g. TMCH Eleeza Agopian:@VANDA: Yes! That would be really great. Rubens Kuhl:Some last minute issues prevented the RySG response, but they will likely be sorted out soon. Kavouss Arasteh:Jonathan, May we review the questions one by one or in a group of 3 or 5? Jeff Neuman:Review of the Application Process is one of those areas from the Affirmation of Commitments that overlaps heavily with the work that we are doing. I understand why the Department of Commerce wanted it in there (to make sure someone reviewed it), but its probably one of those items where we will need to closely coordinate with the CCT-RT Donna Austin, Neustar:Thanks Jonathan, that's helpful. Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Indeed Jeff Eleeza Agopian:Agreed. Good idea. Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):yes an initial q. Jonathan Zuck:That's the plan Kavous, we'll provide any examples we find. Thanks. Kavouss Arasteh:Could we giver some examples ? Kavouss Arasteh:My experience in case of such questionaire is that , in some cases, we need to go back to those answered to clarify the matter. Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):sanatised results VANDA:i believe at elast the region. LAC/ Europe/ North america/ asia Pacific Eleeza Agopian:@Jonathan, I think you are referring to collecting sort of "demographics" on the population, which I agree, we can try to capture. Quoc Pham:as there were a number of contentions as well, should there be a question directed as the resolution of their contentions - private auction vs public auction + the auction process and how that impacted the outcome Kavouss Arasteh:The questions must be clear, concise and precise Susan Payne:Rubens comment about voluntary PICs is also relevant Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):thanks Jonathan... Eleeza Agopian:You can submit any further comments/questions to the cctrt-staff(a)icann.org<mailto:cctrt-staff@icann.org> distribution list. Carlos:do we have a deadline? Donna Austin, Neustar:Just picking up on the IDN issue: priority was given to IDN applicants in the 'draw' process. It would be useful to understand why many IDN applicants did not make better use of the priority afforded by the draw. Laura Watkins:+1 Donna Jonathan Zuck:Thanks folks. Good question Donna. Eleeza Agopian:Thank you, all. Very helpful discussion. Signing off now, but feel free to contact at the cct staff list or my email: eleeza.agopian(a)icann.org<mailto:eleeza.agopian@icann.org>. Kavouss Arasteh:Yes policy neends not to be overwritten but defficiencies, shortcoming s need to be identified and included in the pPDP Kavouss Arasteh:I meant PDP Alexander Schubert:Innocent question: If a "ongoing mechanism" is launched - and 5 portfolio applicants quickly push 2,000 applications into the system - does that mean that no one else can get their application considered for the next 5 years as the system is clocked up? VANDA:@alex, interesting question.. Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):thx Steve Rubens Kuhl:The 1000/year limit is related to delegation, not evaluation, and applicants usually apply for the same strings. Alan Greenberg:ALAC will. Unclear if weill make the Friday dealine, but trying. Rubens Kuhl:And even the 1000/year limit is up for questioning depending on the outcome of the root stability survey. Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):ALAN however I assume that if not by Fri from ALAC we will be able to say when Carlos:sure it does!!!!! Donna Austin, Neustar:@Jeff, yes Alexander Schubert:And what is with multiple applicants for 1 string? In the "ongoing mechanism" you obviously had to submit in the 1st week - or risk the string is applied for by a portfolio applicant and "claimed". That would lead to a situation where most applicants for generic term based strings were "forced" to apply in week one! Imagine the applicant is one like .club, .music or .berlin: One who rallies a "community" behind them (regardless whether it's a community delegated application or not) - these had to rush their application for the fear to "come too late". Sara Bockey:thanks all! VANDA:thank you Avri for all organized for this meeting. Katrin Ohlmer | DOTZON:thanks all! Rubens Kuhl:Thanks all, bye! Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):bye Alexander Schubert:Bye!

1 0

Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda
by Jian C.Zhang Aug. 1, 2016

Aug. 1, 2016

Hi, Chan, could you share the link of adobe connect? I have entered the newgtld,but seems wrong. Jian-Chuan Chang Sr. Research Fellow KNETCo. Ltd. Tel: +86-10-8218-4187 Fax: +86-10-6250-6502Email: jczhang(a)knet.cn ----- 原邮件内容 ----- 发件人: Steve Chan <steve.chan(a)icann.org> 收件人: "gnso-newgtld-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg(a)icann.org> 发送时间:Fri, 29 Jul 2016 18:25:34 +0000 主题:[Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda Dear WG Members, Below, please find the proposed agenda for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG meeting scheduled for Monday, 1 August 2016 at 1300 UTC. 1. Welcome/Review Agenda 2. SOIs 3. Work Track (Sub Team) discussion and planning 4. Competition, Consumer Trust & Consumer Choice Review Team (CCT-RT) – Possible input to their draft applicant survey (if possible, please review the attached document before the WG meeting) with CCT-RT Chair Jonathan Zuck 5. CC1/Overarching Issues Preliminary Findings (https://docs.google.com/document/d/16Sd6mpO5MqHl7BHOl9HBENDgUvcqQ04QumbVNfV…) 6. Accreditation Programs cont. 7. AOB Best, Steven Chan  Sr. Policy Manager   ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536  steve.chan(a)icann.org direct: +1.310.301.3886  mobile: +1.310.339.4410 tel: +1.310.301.5800 fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO http://gnso.icann.org/en/

2 1

[gnso-newgtld-wg] - Letter from Thomas Schneider (Chair, GAC) in response to CC1
by Steve Chan July 31, 2016

July 31, 2016

Dear WG Members, Attached, please find the response to CC1 from Thomas Schneider, Chair of the Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC). Staff has posted this letter on the Wiki, where all future responses from ICANN Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees, as well as GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies, will be posted: https://community.icann.org/x/3B6OAw Best, Steve Steven Chan  Sr. Policy Manager   ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536  steve.chan(a)icann.org direct: +1.310.301.3886  mobile: +1.310.339.4410 tel: +1.310.301.5800 fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO http://gnso.icann.org/en/

2 1